Churchill at 150: A Certain Splendid Memory

Churchill at 150: A Certain Splendid Memory

A memory of maiden speeches

On 18 Feb­ru­ary 1900, young Win­ston Churchill rose for his maid­en speech in the House of Com­mons. At its end, acknowl­edg­ing his thanks to the House for hav­ing lis­tened to him, he invoked the mem­o­ry of his father:

I can­not sit down with­out say­ing how very grate­ful I am for the kind­ness and patience with which the House has heard me, and which have been extend­ed to me, I well know, not on my own account, but because of a cer­tain splen­did mem­o­ry which many Hon. Mem­bers still preserve.

In 1990 I made my own maid­en speech, not in the Cham­ber, if course, but near­by. Unlike Churchill’s, it was not fol­lowed by two or three thou­sand more there. It was the only one. I was aware that such hon­ors are fleet­ing. Once Churchill was shoot­ing pheas­ants on the estate of his friend Ben­dor, the Duke of West­min­ster. “How many did you shoot?” the Duke asked him. “Two brace,” he replied. “Indeed,” said the Duke, “then you’ve shot enough, and I will have your car­riage ordered for tomor­row morning.”

So before my car­riage was sum­moned I man­aged to invoke a memory—or three So many superla­tives have already been issued about Win­ston Churchill, it is scarce­ly nec­es­sary to cre­ate more. But that occa­sion long ago sticks in my memory—not because of what I said, but what three peo­ple I quot­ed said. All of them knew him well. Here is the transcript….

Earl Alexander of Tunis

2 June 1990— Tonight marks the fifti­eth anniver­sary of the final evac­u­a­tions at Dunkirk. Fifty years ago at 3am tomor­row morn­ing, Gen­er­al Sir Harold Alexan­der was the last sol­dier to leave, hav­ing cruised the beach­es to be sure there were none left behind.

Memory
Field Mar­shal Earl Alexan­der in 1946. (Archives Cana­da, pub­lic domain)

I think “Alex” as Churchill called him was one of the great gen­er­als of the war. Who can for­get the famous exchange between the Prime Min­is­ter and Alexan­der as the lat­ter pre­pared to take com­mand in North Africa?

“Your prime & main duty,” Churchill wrote, “will be to take or destroy at the ear­li­est oppor­tu­ni­ty the Ger­man-Ital­ian Army com­mand­ed by Field Mar­shal Rom­mel, togeth­er with all its sup­plies and estab­lish­ments in Egypt & Libya.

“2. You will dis­charge, or cause to be dis­charged, such oth­er duties as per­tain to your com­mand with­out prej­u­dice to the task described in para­graph 1.”

That order in Churchill’s own hand was giv­en Alexan­der on 10 August 1942. And lodged in his mem­o­ry was Alexander’s reply:

“Sir: The orders you gave me on August 10th, 1942 have been ful­filled. His Majesty’s ene­mies, togeth­er with their imped­i­men­ta, have been com­plete­ly elim­i­nat­ed from Egypt, Cyre­naica, Libya and Tripoli­ta­nia. I now await your fur­ther instructions.”

It was typ­i­cal of Alex, a man of few words, who in a calm, order­ly and unflashy way sim­ply got the job done. Churchill of course replied in kind: “Well, obvi­ous­ly we shall have to think of some­thing else.”

Churchill’s sin­gle­mind­ed obses­sion with vic­to­ry typ­i­fied his order to Alexan­der. And that reminds me of a sim­i­lar mem­o­ry recount­ed by a for­mer naval person.

Earl Mountbattten of Burma

In Octo­ber 1941, after being near­ly drowned in the sink­ing of his ship, HMS Kel­lyMount­bat­ten was invit­ed to Pearl Har­bor. His task, he said, “was to address the Amer­i­can Pacif­ic Fleet on what the war was like.” (This prompt­ed laugh­ter among his audi­ence, at Edmon­ton, Cana­da. “Come on, come on!” he grinned. “That was before they came in.”)

Admi­rala of the Fleet The Earl Mount­bat­ten. (Pho­to by Allan War­ren, Cre­ative Commons)

“While there,” he con­tin­ued, “the Prime Min­is­ter recalled me. He said he want­ed me for anoth­er job. I was hor­ri­fied, took my time get­ting back, and was imme­di­ate­ly summoned.

“‘Why have you tak­en so long to answer my sum­mons?’ he demand­ed. ‘You realise what I want you for? You are to relieve Admi­ral Sir Roger Keyes, who is in charge of Com­bined Oper­a­tions.’

“I said: ‘Sir, if this means a desk in White­hall, I would soon­er be back at sea.’

“He retort­ed: ‘Have you no sense of glo­ry? What could you do at sea, except to be sunk in a larg­er and more expen­sive vessel?’

*

“Now just think of this for a moment. It was Octo­ber 1941. Our backs were to the wall, all our allies knocked out, Rus­sia appar­ent­ly on the point of defeat, no sign of the Unit­ed States com­ing in. He went on:

“‘You will devise the appli­ances, the appur­te­nances, and the tech­niques nec­es­sary to get back onto the con­ti­nent. You will get the great­est brains among the three ser­vices as your plan­ners. In Com­bined Oper­a­tions you will plan as one ser­vice. The whole of the south coast of Eng­land is a bas­tion against inva­sion from the Ger­mans. You will turn this bas­tion into a spring­board for our invasion!

“‘Unless we can land on the con­ti­nent and beat the Ger­mans in bat­tle, we shall nev­er win the war. All our head­quar­ters are think­ing defen­sive­ly, except yours. Yours will think only offen­sive­ly. You will go ahead and plan the inva­sion of Ger­many and you will let me know as soon as may be con­ve­nient when you will be ready to invade.’”

Grace Hamblin

My final mem­o­ry is by Grace Ham­blin. From 1932, she was his sec­re­tary, and Lady Churchill’s. Lat­er she became the first admin­is­tra­tor of Chartwell under the Nation­al Trust. Grace’s mem­o­ry was of Jan­u­ary 1965, and the grave­side cer­e­mo­ny at Bladon for his fam­i­ly and clos­est friends:

Memory
Grace Ham­blin, 1987. (Pho­to by Bar­bara Langworth)

“At the end I went down with the fam­i­ly, and to me that qui­et, hum­ble ser­vice in the coun­try church­yard was much more mov­ing than had been the tremen­dous pomp and glo­ry of the state cer­e­mo­ny in London.

“And I pon­dered what had made this dynam­ic but gen­tle char­ac­ter so beloved and respect­ed, and such a won­der­ful per­son to work for. I think one found first of all that there was courage. He had no fear of any­thing, moral or phys­i­cal. There was sin­cer­i­ty, truth and integri­ty, for he couldn’t know­ing­ly deceive a cab­i­net min­is­ter or a brick­lay­er or a sec­re­tary. There was for­give­ness, warmth, affec­tion, loy­al­ty and, per­haps most impor­tant of all in the demand­ing life we all lived, there was humour, which he had in abundance.

“One of those many, many let­ters Lady Churchill received in 1965 came from Amer­i­ca, and it has always been in my mind: ‘That he died is unim­por­tant, for we must all pass away. That he lived is momen­tous to the des­tiny of all. He is not gone. He lives wher­ev­er men are free.’”

To the greatest man in the world

The sto­ry goes (con­firmed by Lady Soames) that a small boy elud­ed all secu­ri­ty and arrived in Churchill’s bed­room at Chartwell. There he found The Pres­ence, in bed rif­fling the news­pa­pers and smok­ing an out­size cigar.

“My dad says you’re the great­est man in the world,” the pre­co­cious nip­per said. “Is it true?”

“Cer­tain­ly,” returned Sir Win­ston. “Now buzz off.”

That too sticks in the mem­o­ry. (Actu­al­ly, Lady Soames said, he used an earth­i­er phrase, but in def­er­ence to my sur­round­ings I edit­ed it.)

And so we toast the hero­ic mem­o­ry of the Rt. Hon. Sir Win­ston Leonard Spencer Churchill, Knight of the Garter, Com­pan­ion of Hon­our, Order of Mer­it, Fel­low of the Roy­al Soci­ety. Nev­er in the his­to­ry of the Twen­ti­eth Cen­tu­ry was so much owed, by so many, to one man.

Living in memory

“Grace Ham­blin, Total Churchillian,” 2015.

“At Bladon: Echoes and Mem­o­ries,” 2024.

Bradley Tolp­pa­nen, “Harold Alexan­der: Churchill’s Favorite Gen­er­al,” 2020.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RML Books

Richard Langworth’s Most Popular Books & eBooks

Links on this page may earn commissions.