Reviews of “Churchill and the Avoidable War”
Churchill and the Avoidable War will cost you the price of a cup of coffee. You can read it in a couple of nights. You may then decide if Churchill was right that the Second World War could have been prevented. Click here for your copy.
Reviewed by Manfred Weidhorn:
Here is an excellent survey of the key “what if” junctures where history could have taken a different turn. What I like about it especially is that it conscientiously steers away from any definitive pronouncements. It offers not one zig or zag making all the difference in preventing the Second World War.
Time and again Richard Langworth rightly stresses our ignorance of what would have followed from one alternative action, and our foolish assumption that other things would have remained the same.
“The know not what they do…”
The main inference from this analysis, as in those of the American Civil War and World War I, is that all leaders operate within a narrow horizon. Like the rest of us, they are steeped in ignorance. “Forgive them, for they know not what they do”….
I’m not sure about the forgiveness part (ISIS? Hitler? Stalin? Pol Pot? No thanks, Jesus). But the second part of that sentence is the single most profound statement about the human race.
I’ve touched on this before. If Hitler had been assassinated in 1937, he would have gone down in history as one of the greatest Germans. If killed in late 1941, before the tide began to turn, he would have gone down among Germans as a military genius. Horrible as it is to say or contemplate, it was necessary for him to stay around to the bitter end so that Germans could see what fools he made of them.
Reviewed by Warren F. Kimball
It’s a very nice job that raises serious historical questions. Langworth recognizes that there is no single plausible event or action that, if changed, could have prevented the Second World War. The operative quotation is, surprisingly, not from Churchill (though there many wonderful ones). It is from Mark Twain, who once said: “History doesn’t repeat itself, but it does rhyme.”
This book would be a first rate supplementary reading in a college course on World War II, one likely to stimulate lively discussions.
— Warren F. Kimball is Treat Professor of History at Rutgers University, editor of Churchill and Roosevelt: The Complete Correspondence, and several books on the two leaders including Forged in War: Roosevelt, Churchill and the Second World War.
Reviewed by Charles W. Crist
This is focused study of the years leading up to the Second World War—a well-researched, compact and compelling book. Langworth utilizes a wide-range of sources to reconstruct the political and military forces impending on Germany, Britain, France, Russia and the United States after the First World War and throughout the 1930s.
Yes, the Second World War was avoidable, if addressed in 1938. But as the author shows, “woulda, coulda shoulda” is not the same as the political courage required to lead people to understand the stakes. Churchill clearly foretold the threat in numerous forums. But he lacked standing to substantially influence the British political process and public. In relying on paper treaties rather than available intelligence and common sense, nations were doomed to repeat the destruction of the European landscape once more.
—Charles W. Crist is a longtime Churchillian and collector of WSC’s books.
More reflections on the Second World War
“Churchill’s Hitler Essays: He Knew the Führer from the Start,” 2024.
“Churchill’s War Memoirs: Simply Great Reading,” 2023.
“Hitler’s Sputtering Austrian Anschluss,” 2020.
“Munich Reflections: Peace for ‘A’ Time and the Case for Resistance,” 2020.
“The Indian Contribution to the Second World War,” 2017