“Very often the eagles have been squalled down by the parrots.”  —WSC, 1945

* * * * *

(Updat­ed from 2022.) Sea­soned Churchillians had mixed reac­tions to the last cel­e­bra­tion: the 50th anniver­sary of Win­ston Churchill’s death. While grat­i­fied that press and pub­lic still remem­bered, we were shocked at some of the ill-con­sid­ered, long-dis­proven asser­tions. That was in 2015. This year marks the Sesqui­cen­ten­ni­al of his birth—and if you think 2015 was shock­ing, load up on Prozac.

For­tu­nate­ly, Sesqui­cen­ten­ni­al attacks will be blunt­ed by vast recent push­back from seri­ous his­to­ri­ans who’ve rebutted the worst slan­ders. So hope­ful­ly, the par­rots will not squall down the eagles.

Call this a pre­emp­tive strike: with links to places where you can find the truth….

Sesquicentennial chestnuts

“The Ten Great­est Con­tro­ver­sies of Win­ston Churchill’s Career,” (BBC) 

This has always been a pop­u­lar per­for­mance. The tac­tic is well-worn. First, you tee-up Churchill as the sav­ior of 1940. Then you tear him down with the famil­iar litany of charges. I do wish they’d come up with some new ones; the old chest­nuts are get­ting shopworn.

One doesn’t mind the Britain Bash­ing Cor­po­ra­tion float­ing harm­less urban leg­ends (“poi­son” gas, strike­bust­ing, pay­ola). But to offer Churchill’s sup­posed racist views, the rude things he said about Gand­hi (but not the nice things–or what Gand­hi said about him), or the Sid­ney Street episode as exam­ples of the “top ten” is intel­lec­tu­al­ly vacant.

The real con­tro­ver­sies of Churchill’s career include the Dar­d­anelles (but not Gal­lipoli), inter­ven­tion in Rus­sia, reor­ga­niz­ing the Mid­dle East, the Gold Stan­dard, Dis­ar­ma­ment, the Rhineland, the Abdi­ca­tion of Edward VIII, Munich. Sin­ga­pore, strate­gic bomb­ing, the atom­ic bomb, and post­war sum­mits with the Rus­sians, among others.

On these there is much legit­i­mate­ly to say in crit­i­cism as well as in praise. (Click on the links above for reli­able information.)

Per­haps the BBC was cater­ing to its per­ceived audi­ence, which dotes on pop­u­lar canards. They’ll prob­a­bly try some of these again on his Sesquicentennial.

Eagles reply

“We shall fight them on the BBC”  

This was a mock inter­view of Churchill, striv­ing to answer some of the detrac­tors. It is more amus­ing than the usu­al defens­es. Sad­ly, though, author Richard Lit­tle­john was care­less with his quotations.

Churchill nev­er said he could only deal with one s*** at a time. And “Jaw-jaw is bet­ter than war-war” was said by Harold Macmil­lan, not WSC.

Still, it was enter­tain­ing to read that his words, “an Iron Cur­tain has descend­ed across the continent”—applied to the Euro­pean Union. Whoops!

True words of wisdom

One miss­es the com­pa­ny of eagles. Sir Mar­tin Gilbert and Lady Soames reg­u­lar­ly con­front­ed these sto­ries. But no one has the ener­gy to tack­le them all.

I was always encour­aged by a wise and bal­anced his­to­ri­an, the late and much missed Pro­fes­sor Paul Addi­son, whose books on Churchill remain stan­dard works:

Don’t wor­ry about attacks on Churchill.  He is alive and kick­ing and haunts the British imag­i­na­tion like no oth­er 20th cen­tu­ry politician.

He will always be car­i­ca­tured, as he was in his life­time. But free­dom of speech and expres­sion was one of the things he fought for, and in his time he gave as good as he got.

The more provoca­tive com­ments about him are a back­hand­ed trib­ute, as they work on the assump­tion that most peo­ple admire him.

My own per­son­al view is that he was even greater as a human being than he was as a politician—a role in which he did make mis­takes, as we all do.

Further reading

“Cur­rent Con­tentions: Sur­ren­der Noth­ing, Defend the Whole,” 2021. Part 1 and Part 2.

“Hearsay Doesn’t Count: Churchill’s Racist Epi­thets are Remark­ably Rare,” 2020.

“The Myth of Dres­den and ‘Revenge Fire­bomb­ing,'” 2023.

“Buck­nell University’s Pan­el on ‘Churchill: Hero or Colo­nial­ist,'” 2022.

“Bri­an Cox as Churchill: An Inter­view on Char­lie Rose,” 2017.

Paul Rahe, “Review of Win­ston Churchill, Myth and Real­i­ty,” 2017.