Tag: Home Secretary

Churchill, Troops and Strikers (2)

Churchill, Troops and Strikers (2)

Con­clud­ed from Part 1

“Guilty with an Expla­na­tion”

Through­out the August 1911 rail­way strike, troops had orders to stand by and act only if pub­lic secu­ri­ty was endan­gered by the strik­ers. But there was anoth­er rea­son why anx­i­ety ran high at that time. A few weeks ear­li­er, the Ger­mans had sent a gun­boat to Agadir, French Moroc­co, and rumors of war with Ger­many were ram­pant. David Lloyd George said the Agadir Cri­sis was a threat to peace, that the Ger­mans “would not hes­i­tate to use the paral­y­sis into which the coun­try was falling in order to attack Britain.” Paul Addi­son, in Churchill on the Home Front, described the pub­lic mood:

The unprece­dent­ed chal­lenge of a simul­ta­ne­ous nation­al stop­page by all four rail­way unions con­vinced respectable opin­ion that the world was about to be turned upside down….Churchill’s own appre­hen­sions were con­nect­ed, appar­ent­ly with fear of sub­ver­sion in Germany….He was also informed by Guy Granet, the gen­er­al man­ag­er of the Mid­land Rail­ways, of alle­ga­tions that labour lead­ers were receiv­ing pay­ments from a Ger­man agent….Conservatives applaud­ed him for tak­ing deci­sive action.…

Read More Read More

Churchill, Troops & Strikers (1)

Churchill, Troops & Strikers (1)

Did Churchill Send Troops Against Strik­ers? “Guilty with an Expla­na­tion”

In a time when the actions of police forces are ques­tioned, when the Nation­al Guard is some­times deployed dur­ing riotous protests in which local res­i­dents are the main vic­tims, Churchill’s expe­ri­ence with strik­ers is wor­thy of study, his mag­na­nim­i­ty wor­thy of reflec­tion.

“The sullen feet of march­ing men in Tony­pandy….” Prime Min­is­ter Harold Wil­son on Churchill’s death, 1965. (Wiki­me­dia)

For a cen­tu­ry it has been part of social­ist demonolo­gy that Churchill sent troops to quell a 1910 min­ers’ strike in Tony­pandy, Wales. In 1967 an Oxford under­grad­u­ate wrote that Churchill had actu­al­ly accom­pa­nied the sol­diers with tanks, which was very pre­scient of him, since they had yet to be invent­ed.…

Read More Read More

“Enemies of Civilization”: Not Churchill’s

“Enemies of Civilization”: Not Churchill’s

In a 1920 arti­cle,  “Zion­ism ver­sus Bol­she­vism,” Churchill not­ed that many lead­ing Bol­she­viks were Jews. Colum­nist Roger Cohen is now read­ing this to mean that Churchill con­sid­ered Jews ene­mies of civ­i­liza­tion.

Quot­ing Churchill out of con­text has become a hob­by among those deter­mined to find among his 15 mil­lion words exact­ly what they hope to find, instead of what he wrote or said. Roger Cohen is too respect­ed a writer to be among them.

In “Jews in a Whis­per” (New York Times Sun­day Review, 21 August 2011), Mr. Cohen argues  that “Jews, with their his­to­ry, can­not become the sys­tem­at­ic oppres­sors of anoth­er peo­ple.” Fair enough, but in recount­ing the his­tor­i­cal antipa­thy to Jews, why do we need to twist Churchill’s words to make the point?….…

Read More Read More