“The Prophet Churchill”: Paris 2015

“The Prophet Churchill”: Paris 2015

The Independent. See: http://ind.pn/1y5nYxy
The Inde­pen­dent. See: http://ind.pn/1y5nYxy

Jan­u­ary 10, 2015— ”Watch­ing the hor­ri­fy­ing events in Paris this week,” wrote Scott John­son, “I have found Churchill’s great speech of Novem­ber 12, 1936 com­ing to mind. It is one of Churchill’s prophet­ic speeches—I believe in the Prophet Churchill—decrying the com­pla­cen­cy of the gov­ern­ment in the face of the gath­er­ing storm in Ger­many”….

“So they go on in strange para­dox,” Churchill assert­ed in Par­lia­ment of those respon­si­ble for the defense of the land, “decid­ed only to be unde­cid­ed, resolved to be irres­olute, adamant for drift, sol­id for flu­id­i­ty, all pow­er­ful to be impo­tent. So we go on prepar­ing more months and years—precious, per­haps vital, to the great­ness of Britain, for the locusts to eat.” Toward the end of his speech, Churchill ren­dered this judg­ment: “The era of pro­cras­ti­na­tion, of half-mea­sures, of sooth­ing and baf­fling expe­di­ents, of delays, is com­ing to its close. In its place we are enter­ing a peri­od of con­se­quences.”

Let us add Churchill’s reflec­tions five months before that, on 2 May 1936, about a nation’s iner­tia in the face of per­il:

 There is noth­ing new in the sto­ry. It is as old as the Sibylline books. It falls into that long, dis­mal cat­a­logue of the fruit­less­ness of expe­ri­ence and the con­firmed unteach­a­bil­i­ty of mankind. Want of fore­sight, unwill­ing­ness to act when action would be sim­ple and effec­tive, lack of clear think­ing, con­fu­sion of coun­sel until the emer­gency comes, until self-preser­va­tion strikes its jar­ring gong—these are the fea­tures which con­sti­tute the end­less rep­e­ti­tion of his­to­ry.

Did self-preser­va­tion strike its jar­ring gong in Paris? His­to­ry doesn’t repeat, Mark Twain argued—“but it some­times rhymes.” Only time will decide if there is a rhyme here.

Those who believe there is no rhyme will argue cor­rect­ly that the glob­al ter­ror pack­age com­bined does not come close to the mil­i­tary threat posed by Nazi Ger­many. But the destruc­tive capac­i­ty of one bomb has advanced expo­nen­tial­ly since Hitler’s time. And where there were 65 mil­lion peo­ple in 1936 Ger­many, only a frac­tion of which were ardent Nazis, there are many more rad­i­cal jihadists today.

Churchill’s words rever­ber­ate. In his time as in ours there were pre­var­i­ca­tors, who declared no dif­fer­ence between “us” and “them”; who insist­ed that we must “under­stand” and even empathize with mor­tal ene­mies. In 1933 Churchill had a reply for these—another warn­ing which res­onates today:

The worst dif­fi­cul­ties from which we suf­fer do not come from with­out. They come from with­in. They do not come from the cot­tages of the wage-earn­ers. They come from a pecu­liar type of brainy peo­ple always found in our coun­try, who, if they add some­thing to its cul­ture, take much from its strength.

Our dif­fi­cul­ties come from the mood of unwar­rantable self-abase­ment into which we have been cast by a pow­er­ful sec­tion of our own intel­lec­tu­als. They come from the accep­tance of defeatist doc­trines by a large pro­por­tion of our politicians.…Nothing can save Eng­land if she will not save her­self. If we lose faith in our­selves, in our capac­i­ty to guide and gov­ern, if we lose our will to live, then indeed our sto­ry is told. (Roy­al Soci­ety of St. George, 24 April 1933)

In the eleventh hour Eng­land did save her­self, and much else besides—but with great dif­fi­cul­ty, and great loss­es. Let it not be said that we were only gal­va­nized after an atroc­i­ty that put Paris, Ottawa, Lon­don and 9/11 in the pale.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *