How Olaf Stapledon Inspired Churchill’s Vision

How Olaf Stapledon Inspired Churchill’s Vision

Excerpt­ed from “Visions of the Future: Churchill and Olaf Sta­ple­don,” writ­ten for the Hills­dale Col­lege Churchill Project. For the orig­i­nal arti­cle with end­notes, click here. To sub­scribe to week­ly arti­cles from Hills­dale-Churchill, click here and scroll to bot­tom. Enter your email in the box “Stay in touch with us.” We nev­er spam you and your iden­ti­ty remains a rid­dle wrapped in a mys­tery inside an enigma.

“Fifty Years Hence”: Churchill’s Prediction

A col­league asks about a pas­sage where Churchill cred­its anoth­er author, Olaf Sta­ple­don, with­out nam­ing him. It occurs in Churchill’s eerie and omi­nous 1931 essay, “Fifty Years Hence.” We owe our knowl­edge to the late Pro­fes­sor of Eng­lish Paul Alkon, and his won­der­ful book Win­ston Churchill’s Imag­i­na­tion (2006).

“Fifty Years Hence” appeared in The Strand mag­a­zine in Decem­ber 1931 and the Amer­i­can Review of Reviews in Jan­u­ary 1932. Churchill gave it per­ma­nent life by includ­ing it in his book Thoughts and Adven­tures (1932). Churchill wrote as follows:

Stapledon
(Amazon.com)

I read a book the oth­er day which traced the his­to­ry of mankind from the birth of the Solar Sys­tem to its extinc­tion. There were fif­teen or six­teen races of men which in suc­ces­sion rose and fell over peri­ods mea­sured by tens of mil­lions of years.

The book was Last and First Men by Olaf Sta­ple­don. Churchill summarized:

In the end a race of beings was evolved which had mas­tered nature. A state was cre­at­ed whose cit­i­zens lived as long as they chose, enjoyed plea­sures and sym­pa­thies incom­pa­ra­bly wider than our own, nav­i­gat­ed the inter­plan­e­tary spaces, could recall the panora­ma of the past and fore­see the future.

Over nine decades lat­er, except for liv­ing as long as we choose, that pas­sage sounds remark­ably per­ti­nent. And the ques­tions it sug­gests are still there.

Olaf Stapledon

Despite his Chris­t­ian name, Olaf Sta­ple­don was born in Cheshire. Like Orwell, whose visions also impressed Churchill, he was a man of the Left. A con­sci­en­tious objec­tor, Sta­ple­don drove ambu­lances in the Great War. While sup­port­ing the Sec­ond World War effort, he spoke on behalf of Richard Acland’s left-wing Com­mon Wealth Par­ty and the Fed­er­al Union. After the war, Sta­ple­don fought against Apartheid in South Africa.

Paul Alkon was a lead­ing teacher of Churchill’s phi­los­o­phy. His book is one of the ten or twelve “Works About” one should pack along on a desert island. Indeed, with­out it, we would not know of the Sta­ple­don influ­ence. Paul wrote:

In satire and sci­ence fic­tion, Churchill is far from Aldous Hux­ley’s equal. Nev­er­the­less it is remark­able that as a writer, Churchill was alert to the same intel­lec­tu­al and artis­tic cur­rents that prompt­ed Brave New World, and able to pro­duce relat­ed forms of writ­ing. In “Fifty Years Hence” Churchill unmis­tak­ably alludes, although not by name, to anoth­er sci­ence fic­tion clas­sic: Olaf Stapledon’s 1930 nov­el, Last and First Men.

I found no Sta­ple­don-Churchill cor­re­spon­dence in the Churchill Archives. Nev­er­the­less, Paul Alkon’s ref­er­ence is impor­tant. Of course, oth­er futur­ists influ­enced Churchill’s famous essay, such as H.G. Wells, and Karel Čapek. But Churchill’s ref­er­ence is specif­i­cal­ly to Stapledon’s book. He cer­tain­ly would have respect­ed him as much as he did Wells, though polit­i­cal­ly they were poles apart.

The ominous message of “Fifty Years Hence”

After cit­ing Sta­ple­don in “Fifty Years Hence,” Churchill draws wor­ri­some impli­ca­tions about the future of mankind:

With­out an equal growth of Mer­cy, Pity, Peace and Love, Sci­ence her­self may destroy all that makes human life majes­tic and tol­er­a­ble. There nev­er was a time when the inher­ent virtue of human beings required more strong and con­fi­dent expres­sion in dai­ly life; there nev­er was a time when the hope of immor­tal­i­ty and the dis­dain of earth­ly pow­er and achieve­ment were more nec­es­sary for the safe­ty of the chil­dren of men.

There nev­er was a time? How per­ti­nent Churchill remains to present-day affairs. Return­ing to Sta­ple­don and his “race of supe­ri­or beings,” Churchill asks:

What was the good…? What did they know more than we know about the answers to the sim­ple ques­tions which man has asked since the ear­li­est dawn of rea­son— “Why are we here? What is the pur­pose of life? Whith­er are we going?”

A hundred years hence

Stapledon
Olaf Sta­ple­don 1886-1950. (Wiki­me­dia Commons)

We are close to a cen­tu­ry since Churchill and Sta­ple­don wrote those words. Today’s dan­gers are not the same as those of their time. It is fool­ish, con­clud­ed Paul Alkon, to believe our times are sim­ply a replay of theirs.

Churchill’s last­ing val­ue lies in his approach—not pre­cise­ly what he did, but the broad prin­ci­ples he applied. These were con­cepts he defend­ed: lib­er­ty, the indi­vid­ual, law, courage, magnanimity—the pre­cepts of his coun­try and its rel­a­tives across the seas, com­bined as a force for good.

The vision of Sta­ple­don as inter­pret­ed by Churchill is brought up to date by Dr. Lar­ry Arnn in his book, Churchill’s Tri­al. And that is a good place to leave this thread, in the hands of a thinker who extrap­o­lates Churchill’s vision as the age of Arti­fi­cial Intel­li­gence unfolds:

Churchill thought that when the con­quest of nature becomes the sig­nal object, the result will be the con­quest of man…. Churchill wrote in “Fifty Years Hence” that we may soon be able to make peo­ple to order, to breed them in lab­o­ra­to­ries. If we can do that, we can make them bet­ter and worse, depend­ing upon the jobs we want them to do. Once we begin this—and it is pos­si­ble now—we will be mak­ing peo­ple to suit our con­ve­nience. Some will be not just rul­ing, but cre­at­ing oth­ers as tools.*

*Lar­ry P. Arnn, Churchill’s Tri­al: Win­ston Churchill and the Sal­va­tion of Free Gov­ern­ment (Nashville: Thomas Nel­son, 2015), 167.

More on Churchill’s imagination

Paul Alkon,  “‘Shall We All Com­mit Sui­cide?’: Churchill’s Sci­en­tif­ic Imag­i­na­tion,” 2020. Part 1 and Part 2.

_____ _____, “Churchill’s Alter­na­tive His­to­ry: Lee’s Tri­umph at Get­tys­burg,” 2020.

Fred Glueck­stein, “Churchill and H.G. Wells, the Two Futur­ists,” Hills­dale Col­lege Churchill Project, 2018.

Richard M. Lang­worth, “Churchill, Wells, and Gov­ern­ment by Experts,” 2022.

______ ______, “Churchill’s Visions of the Future in Thoughts and Adven­tures,” 2018.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RML Books

Richard Langworth’s Most Popular Books & eBooks

Links on this page may earn commissions.