From the category archives:

Quotations

I am a long­time Gone With The Wind col­lec­tor and researcher, and give pre­sen­ta­tions at GWTW events. I’ve also been the GWTW Answer Lady on sev­eral websites. I was recently asked whether Churchill and Roo­sevelt had read Gone With The Wind. I found that FDR read quite a bit of the novel, but I couldn’t come up with any­thing about Churchill. I hope you don’t mind me toss­ing you this ques­tion. Maybe you’ve run across a men­tion of it. I assume that Churchill did see the film as FDR did on 26 Decem­ber 1939, after the movie opened in Wash­ing­ton. GWTW opened in Lon­don on 18 April 1940.  —K.M., Royal Oak, Michigan

On the con­trary, your ques­tion sent me on an inter­est­ing dive through the archives to learn about my favorite char­ac­ter and my favorite novel.

Leslie Howard as Ash­ley Wilkes

Before we get started, a side note: Leslie Howard, who played Ash­ley Wilkes in GWTW, had a busi­ness man­ager, Alfred Chen­halls, who closely resem­bled Churchill, affect­ing sim­i­lar cloth­ing and a hom­burg hat.

Ger­man spies in Lis­bon, observ­ing Chen­halls and Howard board­ing a flight to Lon­don, mis­took them for Churchill and his body­guard. They informed the Luft­waffe, who shot down the plane. Poor Ash­ley Wilkes, ever the loser!

Churchill wrote of the inci­dent: “The bru­tal­ity of the Ger­mans was only matched by the stu­pid­ity of their agents.”

==============================

THE BOOK

In the late 1930s every­body was read­ing it, from my mother to Neville Cham­ber­lain. (His biog­ra­pher Keith Feil­ing tells us that Cham­ber­lain was “tak­ing delight” in it as the Czech cri­sis devel­oped in spring 1938.) Churchill was read­ing it as he wrote the Amer­i­can Civil War chap­ters of his His­tory of the English-Speaking Peo­ples (not pub­lished until after the war). Thanks to Mar­tin Gilbert’s biog­ra­phy we know quite a lot:

Win­ston S. Churchill to Brigadier-General Sir James Edmonds, a Civil War author­ity (Churchill papers: 8/626), 24 March 1939:

When one comes to look at it en bloc, the Con­fed­er­ates never had any chance at all. It was only a ques­tion of the North get­ting under way and the amount of time required to destroy, if nec­es­sary, every liv­ing soul in the Con­fed­er­ate states. The dra­matic point is the won­der­ful resis­tance which they made.

Churchill was fear­ing a new war in Europe at this time:

Have you read Gone With The Wind? It is a ter­rific book, but I expect you are too pressed with your work to read….I hope you are as san­guine as you used to be about no war and our not get­ting scragged.

Edmonds quickly replied, still con­fi­dent of no war in the future:

I have read Gone With The Wind, also Action at Aquia (deal­ing with the dev­as­ta­tion of the Shenan­doah val­ley) and most nov­els on the war includ­ing your namesake’s The Cri­sis [Civil War novel by the Amer­i­can Win­ston Churchill]…..Yes, I am still san­guine. Hitler won’t fight with­out an Ally and Mus­solini is “not for it.”

—Mar­tin Gilbert, Win­ston S. Churchill, Com­pan­ion Vol­ume V, Part 3, Doc­u­ments: The Com­ing of War 1936-1939 (Lon­don: Heine­mann, 1982), 1406, 1413.

It would be inter­est­ing to re-read Churchill’s Civil War chap­ters in A His­tory of the English-Speaking Peo­ples in the knowl­edge that he was read­ing GWTW at the time he wrote them. Nor­man Rose writes:

A His­tory of the English-Speaking Peo­ples is gen­er­ally acknowl­edged to be the least sat­is­fac­tory of [Churchill's] books. It reads as a kind of pas­tiche that pro­claims his “sec­u­lar [Whig] faith,” its finest sec­tion (writ­ten as he read Gone With The Wind) telling the story of the Amer­i­can Civil War….[but] the fact that Churchill was not a trained his­to­rian had its mer­its. As every scholar knows, in research it is nec­es­sary to be dogged in pur­suit of sources, but also ruth­less in sens­ing when to stop and to start writing.

—Nor­man Rose, Churchill: An Unruly Life (New York: Simon & Schus­ter, 1994), 211

==============================

THE FILM

Gable and Leigh at their height (www.altfg.com)

Churchill was clearly bowled over when he saw the film pro­duc­tion. Wit­nesss the John Colville diary (Colville papers) 15 Decem­ber 1940, Ditch­ley Park, Oxford:

We saw Gone With The Wind which lasted till 2.00 a.m. I thought the pho­tog­ra­phy superb. The PM said he was “pul­verised by the strength of their feel­ings and emotions.”

—Mar­tin Gilbert, The Churchill War Papers, vol. 2, Never Sur­ren­der, May 1940-December 1940] (Lon­don: Heine­mann, 1994), 1241.

And in his main bio­graphic vol­ume Sir Mar­tin writes:

On Sun­day Decem­ber 15, at Che­quers, after watch­ing the film Gone With The Wind, he had sat from two until three in the morn­ing dis­cussing the cam­paign in North Africa with Eden. As they talked, the total num­ber of Ital­ian pris­on­ers of war cap­tured by Wavell’s army reached 35,000.

—Mar­tin Gilbert, Win­ston S. Churchill, vol. 6, Finest Hour 1939-1941 (Lon­don: Heine­mann, 1983), 946.

It has been reported, though I have not run down the source, that Churchill once met Vivien Leigh—and was ren­dered speech­less (rare for him) by her beauty. Appar­ently this stemmed not from her role as Scar­lett O’Hara, but as Nelson’s “Lady Hamil­ton” (“That Hamil­ton Woman”)—beyond doubt his favorite film. Nor­man Rose adds:

Late night films, dis­tract­ing “the mind away from other things,” were “a won­der­ful form of enter­tain­ment” that he did not for­sake. He walked out of a “sen­ti­men­tal” Mickey Rooney pic­ture, but stayed for Bette Davis’s splen­did tragedy, Dark Vic­tory, and was “pul­ver­ized” by the emo­tional inten­sity gen­er­ated by Rhett But­ler (Clark Gable) and Scar­lett O’Hara (Vivien Leigh) in Gone With The Wind. Once, at a show­ing of Oliver Twist, when Bill Sykes was coax­ing his dog to the edge of the river to drown it, Churchill thought­fully cov­ered the eyes of his beloved poo­dle, Rufus, who sat on his lap.

Unruly Life, 283

==============================

IN THE CANON

Mar­garet Mitchell’s won­der­ful title inspired Churchill to use it twice. In his World War II mem­oirs he summed up the results of Appease­ment:

Look back and see what we had suc­ces­sively accepted or thrown away: a Ger­many dis­armed by solemn treaty; a Ger­many rearmed in vio­la­tion of a solemn treaty; air supe­ri­or­ity or even air par­ity cast away; the Rhineland forcibly occu­pied and the Siegfried Line built or build­ing; the Berlin-Rome Axis estab­lished; Aus­tria devoured and digested by the Reich; Czecho­slo­va­kia deserted and ruined by the Munich Pact, its fortress line in Ger­man hands, its mighty arse­nal of Skoda hence­for­ward mak­ing muni­tions for the Ger­man armies; Pres­i­dent Roosevelt’s effort to sta­bilise or bring to a head the Euro­pean sit­u­a­tion by the inter­ven­tion of the United States waved aside with one hand, and Soviet Russia’s undoubted will­ing­ness to join the West­ern Pow­ers and go all lengths to save Czecho­slo­va­kia ignored on the other; the ser­vices of thirty-five Czech divi­sions against the still unripened Ger­many Army cast away, when Great Britain could her­self sup­ply only two to strengthen the front in France; all gone with the wind.

—Win­ston S. Churchill, The Sec­ond World War, vol. 2, Their Finest Hour (Lon­don: Cas­sell, 1953), 271

But it was the march toward Munich in 1938 that saw Churchill’s most effec­tive use of the title:

For five years I have talked to the House on these matters—not with very great suc­cess. I have watched this famous island descend­ing incon­ti­nently, feck­lessly, the stair­way which leads to a dark gulf. It is a fine broad stair­way at the begin­ning, but after a bit the car­pet ends. A lit­tle far­ther on there are only flag­stones, and a lit­tle far­ther on still these break beneath your feet…. if mor­tal cat­a­stro­phe should over­take the British Nation and the British Empire, historians a thou­sand years hence will still be baf­fled by the mys­tery of our affairs. They will never under­stand how it was that a vic­to­ri­ous nation, with every­thing in hand, suf­fered them­selves to be brought low, and to cast away all that they had gained by mea­sure­less sac­ri­fice and absolute vic­tory —gone with the wind!

—Win­ston S. Churchill, Arms and the Covenant (Lon­don: Har­rap, 1938), 465: “The Danube Basin,” House of Com­mons, 4 March 1938.


{ 0 comments }

I am in the final stages of writ­ing a book on the reli­gious beliefs of post-World War II Pres­i­dents. In the chap­ter on Dwight Eisen­hower, I wrote that although Eisen­hower asked for the “bless­ing of Almighty God” on D-Day, few assess­ments of him would dwell on his reli­gious char­ac­ter: “In fact, Eisenhower’s faith might be more accu­rately described by Win­ston Churchill’s remark that he had made “so many deposits in the Bank of Obser­vance” as a youth that he had been con­fi­dently with­draw­ing from it ever since. Can you con­firm the quo­ta­tion? —D.H., Virginia

Happy to assist. From Churchill by Him­self, chap­ter on Reli­gion, cit­ing Churchill’s 1930 auto­bi­og­ra­phy:

Hith­erto [until age 21] I had duti­fully accepted every­thing I had been told.…I always had to go once a week to church.…I accu­mu­lated in those years so fine a sur­plus in the Bank of Obser­vance that I have been draw­ing con­fi­dently upon it ever since. Wed­dings, chris­ten­ings, and funer­als have brought in a steady annual income, and I have never made too close enquiries about the state of my account. It might well even be that I should find an overdraft.

–Churchill, My Early Life (Lon­don: Thorn­ton But­ter­worth, 1930, pp. 127–28.

He also had a more suc­cinct remark which you may pre­fer:

I am not a pil­lar of the church but a buttress—I sup­port it from the outside.”

—Circa 1954. Gilbert, Win­ston S. Churchill vol. VIII (Lon­don: Heine­mann, 1988, p. 1161. Rec­ol­lec­tion of Sir Winston’s last pri­vate sec­re­tary, Sir Anthony Mon­tague Browne.

{ 0 comments }

135 Years: Raise a Glass

November 30, 2009

“A few cur­mud­geons have flam­boy­antly abstained from join­ing in this birth­day greet­ing; but they are so few that their action merely empha­sises the fact that per­sonal respect and friend­ship habit­u­ally sur­vive and tran­scend polit­i­cal con­flict in the Mother of Par­lia­ments. It is par­tic­u­larly appro­pri­ate that these all-party trib­utes on his birth­day should be paid to [...]

Read the full article →

Churchill Clairvoyant: Seeing 1940 in 1891

November 2, 2009

Great web­site! I am a psy­chol­o­gist writ­ing a book man­u­script on the bio­log­i­cal basis of self-confidence. Long an admirer of Churchill, I would like to use a quote from the film The Gath­er­ing Storm to demon­strate Churchill’s tremen­dous con­fi­dence. Can you help me find Churchill’s state­ment (in the film) to Ralph Wigram, that when he was a boy, a feel­ing had come [...]

Read the full article →

Errata & Addenda to “Churchill by Himself,” First American and English Editions

October 24, 2009

Churchill by Him­self is dif­fer­ent from all other Churchill quote books through “cor­rectibil­ity.” It offers a ref­er­ence to each quo­ta­tion, and a method by which cor­rec­tions may be sent in, ver­i­fied, and made avail­able dig­i­tally to read­ers. Pro­duc­ing any work as com­pli­cated as this is a con­stant run­ning bat­tle between con­flict­ing sources, experts who dis­agree with each other, [...]

Read the full article →