<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nobel Prize in Literature Archives - Richard M. Langworth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://localhost:8080/tag/nobel-prize-in-literature/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://localhost:8080/tag/nobel-prize-in-literature</link>
	<description>Senior Fellow, Hillsdale College Churchill Project, Writer and Historian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 21:40:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>“A Sun that Never Sets”: Churchill’s Autobiography, “My Early Life”</title>
		<link>http://localhost:8080/churchills-autobiography-early-life</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard M. Langworth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Literary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winston S. Churchill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battle of Omdurman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Everest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fenians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G.A. Henry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harold Nicolson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Fearon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Prize in Literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Manchester]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://richardlangworth.com/?p=6938</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Winston S. Churchill, My Early Life: A Roving Commission.&#160;(London: Thornton Butterworth, 1930; New York: Scribners, 1930.) Numerous reprints and editions since, including <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B003L77V3S/?tag=richmlang-20+my+early+life">e-books</a>.&#160;Excerpted from the Hillsdale College Churchill Project. For the full article, <a href="https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/churchills-autobiography-my-early-life/">click here</a>.</p>
Connoisseur’s Guide
<p>My Early Life&#160;appeared a year before the last volume of&#160;The World Crisis. The subtitle, “A Roving Commission,” is from the first chapter of Churchill’s Ian Hamilton’s March.&#160;It seems he took it from an earlier novel by&#160;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._A._Henty" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">G.A. Henty</a>, one of his favorite authors. The titles changed places in the first American edition.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Winston S. Churchill, <em>My Early Life: A Roving Commission.</em></strong>&nbsp;(London: Thornton Butterworth, 1930; New York: Scribners, 1930.) Numerous reprints and editions since, including <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B003L77V3S/?tag=richmlang-20+my+early+life">e-books</a>.&nbsp;<strong>Excerpted from the Hillsdale College Churchill Project. For the full article, <a href="https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/churchills-autobiography-my-early-life/">click here</a>.</strong></p>
<h2><strong>Connoisseur’s Guide</strong></h2>
<p><em>My Early Life</em>&nbsp;appeared a year before the last volume of&nbsp;<em>The World Crisis</em>. The subtitle, “A Roving Commission,” is from the first chapter of Churchill’s <em>Ian Hamilton’s March.</em>&nbsp;It seems he took it from an earlier novel by&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._A._Henty" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">G.A. Henty</a>, one of his favorite authors. The titles changed places in the first American edition.</p>
<p>A wonderful treat is in store in this most approachable of Churchill’s books.&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Nicolson" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Harold Nicolson</a>&nbsp;in his 1930 review likened&nbsp;<em>My Early</em>&nbsp;Life to “a beaker of champagne.” His bubbly expression is not shy of the mark. If the reader was drawn to Churchill by his war memoirs, his autobiography will come as a revelation. The memoirs chronicle a very public struggle against national extinction. The autobiography charts a young man’s private struggle to be heard. But the same style and pace is there, the same sense of adventure, the piquant humor. We readers are enabled to peer over Churchill’s shoulder as events unfold.</p>
<h2>Vanished Age</h2>
<p>Of course he was born with certain advantages,” as&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Manchester" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">William Manchester</a>&nbsp;put it in his foreword to a 1980s edition:</p>
<blockquote><p>…his youth was virtually incomprehensible to most people then alive. He had been born into the English aristocracy at a time when British noblemen were considered (and certainly considered themselves) little less than godlike. His grandfather was Viceroy of Ireland….These dominant forces—the class into which he had been born—were masters of the greatest empire the globe has ever known, comprising one-fourth of the earth’s surface and a quarter of the world’s population, thrice the size of the Roman Empire at full flush. They also controlled Great Britain herself, to an extent that would be inconceivable in any civilized nation today. One percent of the country’s population—some 33,000 people—owned two-thirds of its wealth, and that wealth, before two world wars devoured it, was breathtaking.</p></blockquote>
<figure id="attachment_6226" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/"><img decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-6226" src="https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/" sizes="(max-width: 228px) 100vw, 228px" srcset="https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/A37aDJ-228x300.jpg 228w, https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/A37aDJ.jpg 300w" alt="life" width="228" height="300"></a><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">The first edition, 1930, in a replica dust jacket.</figcaption></figure>
<p>Nevertheless, Churchill had little handed to him, once family influence had placed him where he wanted to be. He could not have embarked on those thrilling war junkets abroad without the influence of his mother and other great personages. But once there he was on his own, and he acquitted himself well.</p>
<h2>Life cycle</h2>
<p><em>My Early Life</em>&nbsp;begins with Churchill’s first memories at the “Little Lodge” in Dublin. Here his father lived as secretary to his grandfather, the Duke of Marlborough. Winston’s description of his nurse,&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Everest" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mrs. Everest</a>, is heartwarming. The accounts of the Royal Military Academy; his adventures as a war reporter in Cuba, India and South Africa; his <a href="https://richardlangworth.com/churchills-escape-from-the-boers-1899">escape from the Boers in 1899</a>, and charge of the 21st Lancers at&nbsp;<a href="https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/omdurman-the-fallen-foe-an-illustration-of-churchills-lifelong-magnanimity/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Omdurman</a>, will hold the reader’s attention to the end. Here and in his later account of entering politics and Parliament, we can see Churchill’s emerging political philosophy, studded with remarkably advanced views on British society and the Empire.</p>
<p>The text was not entirely fresh when the book appeared in 1930. Churchill had been writing autobiographic books since 1898. But the book melded his experiences together, added a lot, and had a huge printing over the years. There is a copy for every reader, be it a cheap paperback or a rare first edition.</p>
<p>It is notable that&nbsp;<em>My Early Life</em>&nbsp;was one of the two Churchill works excerpted by the Nobel Library—for Sir Winston’s&nbsp;<a href="https://richardlangworth.com/churchills-unmerited-nobel-prize" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">1953 Nobel Prize in Literature</a>. Churchill is at his dazzling best as chronicler and memoirist. Freshly entered in the political wilderness, he wrote thinking that his political career was over.</p>
<p>—from Richard M. Langworth,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/1857532465/?tag=richmlang-20" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Connoisseur’s Guide to the Books of Sir Winston Churchill</em></a>&nbsp;(London: Brasseys, 1998, reprinted 2002).</p>
<h2><strong>An appreciation by Henry Fearon</strong></h2>
<figure id="attachment_6227" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-6227" src="https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/" sizes="auto, (max-width: 225px) 100vw, 225px" srcset="https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/A37bChartwell-225x300.jpg 225w, https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/A37bChartwell.jpg 499w" alt="life" width="225" height="300"></a><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">The first U.S. edition in dust jacket (Chartwell Booksellers)</figcaption></figure>
<p>Churchill’s dedication of&nbsp;<em>My Early Life&nbsp;</em>&nbsp;“To a new generation” confesses his view that he had given a picture of a distant time. How far away those late Victorian years are now.</p>
<p>His account of childhood, school, the Army, and his first arrival at the House of Commons never flags in its interest or importance.&nbsp;Yet even at the time of its writing, Churchill could never have foreseen the enduring weight of Fortune which was to settle upon him.</p>
<p>Fine and interesting as the&nbsp;<em>My Early Life</em>&nbsp;is, there is one small drawback to seasoned readers. Just as we are expecting the author’s politics to entertain us, we are hurried backwards to tales already told in the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00E4XXELQ/?tag=richmlang-20+malakand+field+force" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Malakand Field Force</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/1620874768/?tag=richmlang-20+the+river+war" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The River War</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/143440434X/?tag=richmlang-20+ian+hamilton%27s+march" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ian Hamilton’s March</em></a>, and his escape from the Boers in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/1406845825/?tag=richmlang-20+london+to+ladysmith" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>London to Ladysmith via Pretoria</em></a>. Yet this is a tale well worth reading—or re-reading.&nbsp;<em>My Early Life&nbsp;</em>will always be, I believe, the most readable of Churchill’s books.</p>
<h2>* * *</h2>
<p><em>Mr. Fearon was a distinguished bibliophile and collector. Years ago left me a copy of his unpublished commentary on Churchill’s books. He had, I think, a way with words. His full account of</em>&nbsp;My Early Life&nbsp;<em>is <a href="https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/churchills-autobiography-my-early-life/">a click away</a>.&nbsp;</em><em>&nbsp;—RML</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Churchill’s Unmerited Nobel Prize”</title>
		<link>http://localhost:8080/churchills-unmerited-nobel-prize</link>
					<comments>http://localhost:8080/churchills-unmerited-nobel-prize#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard M. Langworth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2017 16:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Literary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winston S. Churchill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bengal Famine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Prize in Literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guardian]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://richardlangworth.com/?p=5392</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Where do people get these false, sad notions? The ​late Harry Jaffa said it stems from a public appetite for articles which denigrate nobility or idealism​: "Young people are led to believe that to succeed in politics is to prove oneself a clever or lucky scoundrel. The detraction of the great has become a passion for those who cannot suffer greatness." Professor Jaffa said that thirty years ago. He hadn't seen anything yet.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/may/10/churchills-unmerited-nobel-for-literature">A letter to&nbsp;</a><em>The Guardian&nbsp;</em>presents a new Churchill Transgression. His 1953 Nobel Prize in&nbsp;Literature (for “mastery of historical and biographical description [and]&nbsp;oratory defending exalted human values”) is&nbsp;undeserved! The writer says:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">As historian David Reynolds has detailed, the six volumes of Churchill’s history [sic; it was memoir not history] of the Second World War were built upon selective memory forged out of ego, not least the “great man’s” fleeting memory of the 1943 Bengal famine, in which more than 3.5 million people perished, to a large extent as a direct consequence of Churchill’s policies and actions. His hatred of the peoples of the Indian subcontinent is a matter of record.</p>
<p>It is always intriguing to read a new chapter in the unfolding catalogue of Churchill’s Perfidy. Even if the evidence offered consists of misunderstanding Professor Reynolds, swallowing an empty myth, and seizing on an untoward comment in a moment of frustration (“I hate Indians”).</p>
<div class="gmail_default">This letter deserves a Nobel Prize of its own. To quote Churchill’s famous 1944 raspberry:&nbsp; “I should think it was hardly possible to state the opposite of the truth with more precision.”</div>
<h3 class="gmail_default">What the Nobel was for…​</h3>
<div>1) It is a fundamental error to believe that Churchill’s Nobel Prize for Literature was for <em>The Second World War</em>. It was awarded in 1953, when the war memoirs were still incomplete. The Nobel Committee noted instead his autobiography, <em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/0684823454/?tag=richmlang-20">My Early Life</a>,&nbsp;</em>and his biography,&nbsp;<i><a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/0226106330/?tag=richmlang-20">Marlborough</a>. </i>The scholar&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leo_Strauss">Leo Strauss</a> called <em>Marlborough&nbsp;</em>&nbsp;“the greatest historical work written in our century, an inexhaustible mine of political wisdom and understanding.” Churchill’s war volumes may have influenced the Committee, so widely were they praised. But none of the Committee’s reviewers mention <em>The Second World War</em> in their comments.</div>
<div>.</div>
<div><a href="https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kjell_Str%C3%B6mberg" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Kjell Strömberg</a> of the Swedish Academy said the first report on Churchill’s Literature nomination was in 1946, two years before the first war memoirs appeared. The Academy’s aged <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Per_Hallstr%C3%B6m" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Per Hallström</a>&nbsp;found “no literary merit” in Churchill’s novel&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01B51ZB8I/?tag=richmlang-20" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Savrola</em></a>, and dismissed <em>My Early Life</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;&nbsp;<em>The World Crisis</em><em>.&nbsp;</em>Only&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00JXM38R8/?tag=richmlang-20+marlborough" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Marlborough</em></a>, Hallström wrote, was a qualifying work. He made no mention of&nbsp;<em>The Second World War.&nbsp;</em>(See <a href="https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/churchills-nobel-prize-peace-literature/">Fred Glueckstein’s essay on the Prizes, 1946-1954.</a>)</div>
<h3>Caesar and Cicero</h3>
<div>In awarding the prize, Sigfrid Siwertz of the Swedish Academy called&nbsp;Churchill</div>
<div></div>
<div style="padding-left: 40px;">…a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Caesar">Caesar</a> who also has the gift of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cicero">Cicero’s</a> pen. Never before has one of history’s leading figures been so close to us by virtue of such an outstanding combination. In his great work about his ancestor, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Churchill,_1st_Duke_of_Marlborough">John Churchill, First Duke of Marlborough</a>, Churchill writes, “Words are easy and many, while great deeds are difficult and rare.” Yes, but great, living, and persuasive words are also difficult and rare. And Churchill has shown that they too can take on the character of great deeds.*</div>
<div></div>
<div>Referring to his war speeches, the Nobel committee also cited Churchill’s “brilliant oratory defending exalted human values.” Siwertz writes of “the resilience and pungency of his phrases.” He quotes Lord Birkenhead’s description : a “glow of conviction and appeal, instinctive and priceless, which constitutes true eloquence.” Churchill’s oratory, Siwertz continues, “is swift, unerring in its aim, and moving in its grandeur.”</div>
<div></div>
<h3>Who Wrote What</h3>
<div>
<div class="gmail_default">2) David Reynolds’ <em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/0679457437/?tag=richmlang-20">In Command of History</a>&nbsp;</em>is an excellent study of the war memoirs. Reynolds explains how Churchill employed teams of experts to help compile its six lengthy volumes. But Reynolds concludes that it was a classic memoir. It was Churchill’s case, to be sure, but eloquently presented. Churchill himself signed off on every word. Given such a talented team as Reynolds describes, how did they manage to offer only “selective memory forged out of ego​”?​ ​And whom does the writer ​think wrote Churchill’s war speeches?</div>
</div>
<h3 class="gmail_default">Bengal Famine: again</h3>
<div>
<div class="gmail_default">3) Slander about the Bengal Famine is getting to be a very old chestnut.&nbsp;It was refuted beginning 2008, with Arthur Herman’s Pulitzer-nominated <i><a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/0553804634/?tag=richmlang-20">Gandhi &amp; Churchill.</a>&nbsp;</i>Hillsdale College’s <em><a href="https://richardlangworth.com/new-churchill-documents">Fateful Questions</a>,</em> volume #19 of Churchill Documents, shows&nbsp;<a href="https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/did-churchill-cause-the-bengal-famine/">the sustained effort Churchill and his Cabinet&nbsp;made to get grain to India</a>. The documents show they scoured the stockpiles from Iraq to Australia, tried to come up with substitute grains, even implored Roosevelt (who refused). &nbsp;The documents support Arthur Herman’s conclusion: ​”Without Churchill, the Bengal Famine would have been worse.”</div>
</div>
<h3 class="gmail_default">Priorities for India</h3>
<div class="gmail_default">4) In 1942,&nbsp;the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_National_Congress">Indian Congress Party</a> prescribed only passive resistance if Japan invaded India. This affronted Churchill. “<span id="viewer-highlight">I hate Indians,” he exclaimed. Affronted he might be, given what the Axis Powers had in mind for India. </span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_F._Buckley_Jr.">William F. Buckley, Jr.</a> said of this remark: “I don’t doubt that the famous gleam came to his eyes when he said this, with mischievous glee—an offense, in modern convention, of genocidal magnitude.”</div>
<div></div>
<div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-size: 16px;">Yet this was the same Churchill who set out three priorities for the new Viceroy of India, </span><a style="font-size: 16px;" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archibald_Wavell,_1st_Earl_Wavell">General Wavell</a><span style="font-size: 16px;">: a) “Defense of India from Japanese menace.” b) “The material and cultural conditions of the many peoples of India.” c) “Assuage the strife between the Hindus and Moslems and to induce them to work together for the common good.” After winning the war, feeding the people. Some hater.</span></div>
<h3 class="gmail_default">Why?</h3>
<div>
<div class="gmail_default">Where do people get these false, sad notions? The ​late <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_V._Jaffa">Harry Jaffa</a> said it stems from a public appetite for articles which denigrate nobility or idealism​:</div>
<div></div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="padding-left: 40px;">Young people are led to believe that to succeed in politics is to prove oneself a clever or lucky scoundrel. The detraction of the great has become a passion for those who cannot suffer greatness.</div>
<div></div>
<div class="gmail_default">Professor Jaffa said that thirty years ago. He hadn’t seen anything yet.</div>
<div class="gmail_default"></div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default">_______</div>
<div class="gmail_default">*An inexpensive book from&nbsp;the Nobel Library, containing Siwertz’s presentation&nbsp;speech, Churchill’s response,&nbsp;with excerpts from&nbsp;<em>My Early Life</em> and an appreciation by <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_Trevor-Roper">Hugh Trevor-Roper</a>, is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000CIZBY0/?tag=richmlang-20+camus+-+winston+churchill"><em>Albert Camus – Winston Churchill</em> </a>(1971). The book also excerpts&nbsp;<em>The Island Race.</em>&nbsp;This was<em>&nbsp;</em>a condensation of Churchill’s<em> History of the English-Speaking Peoples. </em><em>HESP,&nbsp;</em>unpublished at the time of the prize-giving.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>http://localhost:8080/churchills-unmerited-nobel-prize/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
