<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gathering Storm Archives - Richard M. Langworth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://localhost:8080/tag/gathering-storm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://localhost:8080/tag/gathering-storm</link>
	<description>Senior Fellow, Hillsdale College Churchill Project, Writer and Historian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2023 17:56:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>“Churchill and the Movies”: Hillsdale Lecture Series, March 24-28th</title>
		<link>http://localhost:8080/churchill-movies-cca</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard M. Langworth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2019 18:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winston S. Churchill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albert Finney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alexander Korda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Bancroft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Hopkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bengal Famine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center for Constructive Alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clementine Churchill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doris Lady Castlerosse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Oldman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gathering Storm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James W. Muller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Fleet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Lithgow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Arnn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laurence Olivier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Gilbert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio Free HIllsdale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Hardy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Shaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simon Ward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[That Hamilton Woman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Crown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tonypandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanessa Redgrave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vivien Leigh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Shakespeare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Young Winston]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://richardlangworth.com/?p=8042</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Movies
<p>In 1927, Winston Churchill wrote to his wife Clementine, “I am becoming a film fan.” He had projection equipment installed at Chequers, the country home of British prime ministers, in 1943, and at his family home Chartwell in 1946. “Churchill and the Movies” is the fourth and final event of the Center for Constructive Alternatives in the 2018-19 academic year. We will view and discuss two films widely regarded as Churchill’s favorites, and two Churchill biographic movies in their historical context.</p>
<p>Hillsdale’s <a href="https://www.hillsdale.edu/educational-outreach/center-for-constructive-alternatives/">Center for Constructive Alternatives</a> (CCA) is the sponsor of one of the largest college lecture series in America.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>The Movies</h3>
<p>In 1927, Winston Churchill wrote to his wife Clementine, “I am becoming a film fan.” He had projection equipment installed at Chequers, the country home of British prime ministers, in 1943, and at his family home Chartwell in 1946. “Churchill and the Movies” is the fourth and final event of the Center for Constructive Alternatives in the 2018-19 academic year. We will view and discuss two films widely regarded as Churchill’s favorites, and two Churchill biographic movies in their historical context.</p>
<p>Hillsdale’s <a href="https://www.hillsdale.edu/educational-outreach/center-for-constructive-alternatives/">Center for Constructive Alternatives</a> (CCA) is the sponsor of one of the largest college lecture series in America. CCA seminars are held four times each year. Students are required to complete one CCA seminar during their undergraduate years. They may elect to enroll in more. Lectures are open to the public, and out-of-town guests are welcomed. There is no registration fee and the program includes dinners and lunches. “Churchill and the Movies” is now sold out, and up to 400 guests are expected plus students. Watch this space for the web stream video locations.</p>
<h3>Partial Schedule:</h3>
<h3>Sunday 24 March</h3>
<p><a href="https://richardlangworth.com/churchill-movies-cca/hamiltonwoman" rel="attachment wp-att-8045"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-8045 alignright" src="https://richardlangworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Hamiltonwoman-203x300.jpg" alt="movies" width="203" height="300" srcset="http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Hamiltonwoman-203x300.jpg 203w, http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Hamiltonwoman-183x270.jpg 183w, http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Hamiltonwoman.jpg 259w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 203px) 100vw, 203px"></a><strong>4:00pm Showing of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/That_Hamilton_Woman"><em>That Hamilton Woman</em></a> </strong>(1941, 125 minutes). Produced and directed by <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Korda">Alexander Korda</a>, this was Winston Churchill’s clear favorite among movies. It stars two actors he vastly admired, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivien_Leigh">Vivien Leigh</a> and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laurence_Olivier">Laurence Olivier.</a></p>
<p><strong>8:00 p.m. Filmmaker John Fleet: “Churchill and Alexander Korda.” </strong>&nbsp;Mr. Fleet has made a study of their long and fruitful relationship might have produced several more epic movies, had not World War II intervened.</p>
<h3>Monday 25 March</h3>
<p><strong>10:00 a.m. “Assault on Churchill”: John Miller interviews</strong> Richard Langworth on Radio Free Hillsdale, 101.7 fm. The station will offer an audio stream.</p>
<p><strong>4:00 p.m. Showing of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_V_(1944_film)"><em>Henry V</em></a> </strong>(1944, 137 mins.) Arguably runner-up in Churchill’s affections was the 1944 British Technicolor adaptation of William Shakespeare’s “Henry V.” The on-screen title is <em>“The Chronicle History of King Henry the Fift with His Battell Fought at Agin Court in France”</em> (derived from the title of the 1600 quarto edition). It stars WSC’s longtime friend Laurence Olivier, who also directed.</p>
<h3><a href="https://richardlangworth.com/churchill-movies-cca/henry_v_-_1944_uk_film_poster" rel="attachment wp-att-8046"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignleft wp-image-8046" src="https://richardlangworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Henry_V_–_1944_UK_film_poster-300x228.jpg" alt="movies" width="332" height="252" srcset="http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Henry_V_–_1944_UK_film_poster-300x228.jpg 300w, http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Henry_V_–_1944_UK_film_poster.jpg 309w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 332px) 100vw, 332px"></a>“The Play’s the Thing…”</h3>
<p><strong>8:00 p.m. Richard Langworth: “Churchill, Shakespeare, and <em>Henry V.</em>”&nbsp; Excerpt:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>How well did Churchill know Shakespeare? Well enough, I think, to ace a Hillsdale Shakespeare course. Both by formal quotations, and by well-known phrases almost hidden in his text, Churchill draws allusions and understanding from sixteen Shakespeare plays, from Macbeth to A Midsummer Night’s Dream—though not, surprisingly, the sonnets.</p>
<p>The producer Marlo Lewis says&nbsp;<em>Henry V</em>&nbsp;introduces us “to urgent problems of statesmanship and, through them, to questions of political philosophy….the delicate matters of legitimacy and the founding of regimes.” I think that is an aspect, but not the most important aspect. Above that and first, the importance of <em>Henry V</em> is what it teaches about leadership.</p>
<p>Churchill wrote in his <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/1474216315/?tag=richmlang-20"><em>History of the English-Speaking Peoples</em></a> that when one of Henry’s officers “deplored the fact that they had ‘but one ten thousand of those men in England that do no work to-day,’ the King rebuked him and revived his spirits in a speech to which Shakespeare has given an immortal form: ‘If we are marked to die, we are enough To do our country loss; and if to live, The fewer men, the greater share of honour.’” Compare that to Churchill’s greatest speech, 18 June 1940: “If the British Empire and its Commonwealth last for a thousand years, men will still say, ‘This was their finest hour.’”</p></blockquote>
<h3>Tuesday 26 March</h3>
<p><strong><a href="https://richardlangworth.com/churchill-movies-cca/young_winston" rel="attachment wp-att-8052"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-8052" src="https://richardlangworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Young_Winston-200x300.jpg" alt width="200" height="300" srcset="http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Young_Winston-200x300.jpg 200w, http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Young_Winston-180x270.jpg 180w, http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Young_Winston.jpg 257w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px"></a>4:00 p.m. Showing of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_Winston"><em>Young Winston</em></a></strong> (1972, 143 mins.)</p>
<p><strong>8:00 p.m. “Young Winston and My Early Life,” with <a href="https://www.uaa.alaska.edu/academics/college-of-arts-and-sciences/departments/political-science/faculty/muller.cshtml">James W. Muller</a>, University of Alaska Anchorage.</strong> An expert on Churchill’s autobiography, Professor Muller is well qualified to survey of this remarkable 1972 biopic, starring <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Ward">Simon Ward</a> as Young Winston. The cast was sensational. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anne_Bancroft">Anne Bancroft</a> as Lady Randolph, is leered at by Lloyd George (<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Hopkins">Anthony Hopkins</a>). <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Shaw_(actor)">Robert Shaw</a> is Lord Randolph (remember “Quint” in&nbsp;<em>Jaws</em>?). Young Winston’s evil headmaster at St. George’s School is the great <a href="https://richardlangworth.com/tim-memory-robert-hardy-1925-2017">Robert Hardy</a>, who would memorably play Churchill many times in later years.</p>
<h3>Wednesday 27 March</h3>
<figure id="attachment_8051" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-8051" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://richardlangworth.com/churchill-movies-cca/11-lithgow" rel="attachment wp-att-8051"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-8051" src="https://richardlangworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/11-Lithgow-300x190.jpg" alt="movies" width="300" height="190" srcset="http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/11-Lithgow-300x190.jpg 300w, http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/11-Lithgow-425x270.jpg 425w, http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/11-Lithgow.jpg 630w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px"></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-8051" class="wp-caption-text">John Lithgow as WSC in “The Crown.”</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>2:00 p.m. Richard Langworth: “Current Contentions- Winston Churchill and the Invasion of the Idiots.” </strong>A review of the virulent attacks on Churchill in the wake of Gary Oldman’s Oscar for his role as WSC in&nbsp;<em>Darkest Hour.&nbsp;</em>We will discuss four slanders in detail: Fake history in the television series&nbsp;<em><a href="https://richardlangworth.com/fake-history-crown">The Crown.</a>&nbsp;</em>Churchill’s alleged 1930s “secret affair” with <a href="https://richardlangworth.com/churchill-marriage-lady-castlerosse">Lady Castlerosse</a>. The continuing fable that Churchill exacerbated the 1943-44 <a href="https://richardlangworth.com/bengal-hottest-churchill-debate">Bengal Famine</a>. And a renewed “golden oldie” beloved of socialists for a century: the <a href="https://richardlangworth.com/churchill-tonypandy-llanelli">Tonypandy riots</a> of 1910. <strong>Excerpt:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>Netflix’s <em>The Crown</em> is a not-so-crowning-achievement about the present Queen’s ascent to the throne and her first years as monarch. It starts off well enough. Claire Foy is an honest Elizabeth II.&nbsp; Matt Smith is a gaudy Prince Philip, acting the foolish playboy. Dame Harriet Walter plays a graceful Clementine Churchill.</p>
<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Lithgow">John Lithgow</a> as Churchill is good on the voice and mannerisms, minimizing his 6-foot-4 stature with a stoop, and by sitting down a lot. But the script gives him a cartoonish image, far from reality. All too quickly, Lithgow becomes a wheezing old gaffer, clinging stubbornly to power.&nbsp;Productions like <em>The Crown</em> suggest that truth and accuracy matter less than style and perception; that reality must bend to fit the creator’s mindset.</p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>* * *</h3>
<p><strong><a href="https://richardlangworth.com/churchill-movies-cca/the_gathering_storm_2002_poster" rel="attachment wp-att-8048"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-8048" src="https://richardlangworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/The_Gathering_Storm_2002_poster-203x300.jpg" alt width="203" height="300" srcset="http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/The_Gathering_Storm_2002_poster-203x300.jpg 203w, http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/The_Gathering_Storm_2002_poster-183x270.jpg 183w, http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/The_Gathering_Storm_2002_poster.jpg 259w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 203px) 100vw, 203px"></a>4:00 p.m. Showing of <a href="https://richardlangworth.com/gathering-storm-finney"><em>The Gathering Storm</em></a></strong> (2002, 96 mins.) Stars the late <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Finney">Albert Finney</a> as Churchill and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanessa_Redgrave">Vanessa Redgrave</a> as Clementine. This is one of the better World War II biographical movies.&nbsp;Even in a cynical and anti-hero age, filmmakers still can avoid reducing Churchill to a flawed burlesque or a godlike caricature. Except for huge gap in the story line, <em>The Gathering Storm</em> is outstanding. (The gap is Munich, because the film skips it in the rush to war.)</p>
<p><strong>8:00 p.m. Hillsdale College President Larry P. Arnn: “Churchill as War Leader.” </strong>Dr. Arnn is co-editor with Martin Gilbert of&nbsp;<em><a href="https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/store/">The Churchill Documents</a>.&nbsp;</em>Few scholars have devoted more time over the years to studying Churchill’s statesmanship; his remarks stand to be the outstanding feature of this event.</p>
<h3>Thursday 28 March</h3>
<p><strong>4:00 p.m. Faculty Round Table:</strong> Daniel Coupland, James Brandon, Darryl Hart, David Stewart</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Albert Finney in “The Gathering Storm”</title>
		<link>http://localhost:8080/gathering-storm-finney</link>
					<comments>http://localhost:8080/gathering-storm-finney#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard M. Langworth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albert Finney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gathering Storm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Headey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Munich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanessa Redgrave]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardlangworth.com/?p=51</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>“The Gathering Storm,” a film for television produced by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBC_Films">BBC Films</a> and <a href="http://www.hbo.com/">HBO Inc</a>.. Starring <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Finney">Albert </a>Finney as Winston Churchill and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanessa_Redgrave">Vanessa Redgrave</a> as Clementine. First aired April 2002, 90 minutes.</p>
<p>Churchill films seldom engender unanimity. But everyone who watched the preview, by kind invitation of the British Consul in Boston, had the same reaction. “The Gathering Storm” is really good. Even in a cynical and anti-hero age, filmmakers still can avoid reducing Churchill to a flawed burlesque or a godlike caricature. Except for huge gap in the story line, “The Gathering Storm” is outstanding.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>“The Gathering Storm,” a film for television produced by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBC_Films">BBC Films</a> and <a href="http://www.hbo.com/">HBO Inc</a>.. Starring <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Finney">Albert </a>Finney as Winston Churchill and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanessa_Redgrave">Vanessa Redgrave</a> as Clementine. First aired April 2002, 90 minutes.</em></p>
<p>Churchill films seldom engender unanimity. But everyone who watched the preview, by kind invitation of the British Consul in Boston, had the same reaction. “The Gathering Storm” is really good. Even in a cynical and anti-hero age, filmmakers still can avoid reducing Churchill to a flawed burlesque or a godlike caricature. Except for huge gap in the story line, “The Gathering Storm” is outstanding.</p>
<h3>Best performances</h3>
<p>The two greatest supporting roles are female. Clementine Churchill was misplayed by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siân_Phillips">Sian Phillips</a> in the <a href="https://richardlangworth.com/hardy2015">“Wilderness Years”</a> documentary. But here Clemmie gets justice at the hands of Vanessa Redgrave.</p>
<p>Redgrave not only looks the part—grandson Winston Churchill, who should know, told me the resemblance is uncanny. But scriptwriter Hugh Whitemore has also provided her with exactly the right lines as she cajoles, scolds, wheedles and encourages her husband. “I often put myself in Clemmie’s shoes,” wrote <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_diana_cooper">Lady Diana Cooper.</a>&nbsp;“And often felt how they pinched and rubbed till I kicked them off, heroic soles and all, and begged my husband to rest and be careful. Fortunately, Clemmie was a mortal of another clay.”</p>
<h3>Ava Wigram</h3>
<p>Equally compelling is Ava (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lena_Headley">Lena Headey</a>), the beautiful wife of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Wigram">Ralph Wigram</a> (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linus_Roache">Linus Roache</a>). As <a href="http://www.martingilbert.com/">Martin Gilbert </a>revealed in the official biography, Wigram risked his career to bring Churchill secrets on German rearmament. Devotedly, Ava bears her husband’s strain, their deep concern for their young, autistic son. And the worst that politics can throw at her.</p>
<p>Angered by Wigram’s aid to Churchill, the government reacts. A toady named Pettifer (actually Board of Trade President <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Runciman,_1st_Viscount_Runciman_of_Doxford">Walter Runciman</a>) visits Ava with a threat. If her husband doesn’t stop helping Churchill he will be transferred abroad, leaving Ava and the boy alone in London. She tells him to do his worst and throws him out.</p>
<p>This is an overdue tribute to a little-known heroine. Ava Bodley married Ralph Wigram in 1925. After Ralph’s premature death in 1936 she wrote to Churchill… “He adored you so &amp; always said you were the greatest Englishman alive.” In 1941 she married <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Anderson,_1st_Viscount_Waverley">John Anderson</a>, Viscount Waverly, Home Secretary and Chancellor of the Exchequer. It was he for whom the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anderson_shelter#Anderson_shelter">Anderson Shelter </a>was named. Churchill was devoted to Ava all his life. When Anderson died in 1958, Churchill telephoned her from Chartwell. “After commiserating with her on Lord Waverly’s death he was silent for a while,” writes Martin Gilbert. Then he said “with what sounded like tears in his voice, ‘For Ralph Wigram grieve.'”</p>
<h3>Finney and supporting cast</h3>
<p>Albert Finney as Churchill is ten or fifteen years too old and looks more like WSC’s nephew Peregrine. But his mannerisms and pale blue eyes are right, and he grows on you, despite unnecessary toilet scenes and red velvet siren suits worn round the clock. Finney overplays the role—every Churchill impersonator does, except the inimitable <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Hardy">Robert Hardy</a>. But he is all right. Again Whitemore’s script comes through. Here and there is a snatch of words Churchill spoke in later or different contexts. (A 1939 broadcast to America is recast as a Commons speech in 1936.) But the flow is so seamless that only the determined critic will notice.</p>
<p>The rest of the casting is good—not as physically exact as in “The Wilderness Years,” but convincing and finely directed by Richard Loncraine. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Tuchet-Jesson,_Baroness_Audley">Sarah Churchill</a> should have had a flame red wig to hide that mousy hair, and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendan_Bracken">Brendan Bracken</a> also starts too dark-haired, though his mop reddens as the crisis mounts! <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randolph_Churchill">Randolph Churchill</a> is too young and silly.&nbsp;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigel_Havers">Nigel Havers</a> was a better Randolph in the 1982 version. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derek_Jacobi">Derek Jacobi</a> makes a lifelike <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Baldwin">Stanley Baldwin</a>. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_Robert_Vansittart">Sir Robert Vansittart</a> (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Wilkinson">Tom Wilkinson</a>) is the uneasy Undersecretary of State for Foreign Affairs, balancing loyalty to his government with fear for his country, saying of Churchill, “he demands total loyalty,” and implying that it’s worth it.</p>
<h3>Fine scenes with a major gap</h3>
<p>The opening scenes at Chartwell in 1934 play like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Manchester">William Manchester’s</a> prologue to his second volume of&nbsp;<em>The Last Lion</em>, providing a penetrating look at the household down to “Mr. Accountant Woods,” who on cue pronounces Winston’s finances a shambles. Winston’s hobbies—painting, bricklaying, feeding his fish, watching his pigs (the famous pig line is <em>de rigueur</em>)—are nicely done, though the fishpond is not the one at Chartwell. Mary Churchill (now <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Soames">Lady Soames</a>) looks more like a young <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelsea_Clinton">Chelsea Clinton</a> than the beautiful Mary.&nbsp;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronnie_Barker">Ronnie Barker</a> is almost ideal as Inches, the long-suffering and devoted butler, but Barker is too English; as&nbsp;his grandson&nbsp;advises me (see comments), Inches was a Scot.</p>
<p>If this film were not so good, the gap in the story line would be unforgivable: After 1936 and Baldwin’s retirement as Prime Minister, we skip ahead to the war and Churchill’s arrival at the Admiralty. How can a film entitled “The Gathering Storm” ignore the premiership of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neville_chamberlain">Neville Chamberlain</a> and <a href="ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_Pact">Munich</a>?</p>
<p>Granted, there are only ninety minutes, and one can understand the omission of, say, the&nbsp;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdication_crisis">Abdication Crisis</a>. But without Munich the story falls short of its dramatic potential. Sadly too, Churchill in Commons mainly utters only banal statistics about aircraft production (too often to an empty House—most times he packed the place). By devoting fewer minutes to India and aircraft, they could have allowed Finney to tackle that most famous prewar oration, after Munich: <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/1586486381/?tag=richmlang-20">“I have watched this famous island descending the stairway which leads to a dark gulf.”</a></p>
<h3>Final thoughts</h3>
<p>A minor flaw is the failure to identify all the characters. Modern audiences would benefit from seeing the credits before the film, the actors portrayed alongside a few lines identifying the characters they represent. But there’s little else to criticize, and what’s missing in 1937-39 is balanced by what’s included in 1934-36. Perhaps they’ve left room for a sequel?</p>
<p>The essence of this film is not so much the urgency of the hour, the naiveté of Britain’s leaders, their refusal to act “until self-preservation strikes its jarring gong,” Churchill’s defiant warnings when nobody would listen (his true finest hour, many think)—and the relevance of Britain’s inertia to our growing lethargy today, in the face of equally perilous threats. All that is there—but primarily this is a love story.</p>
<p>The intensity of Winston and Clementine’s devotion to one another permeates the tale. From their spats over money to their rapid reconciliations; from Winston’s chagrin at Clemmie’s four-month sojourn in the South Seas (“If it weren’t for Mary I’d be awfully miserable”), to his impromptu romp through his fishpond upon her return; to his touching tribute as he heads for the Admiralty (“thank you for loving me”), the film exudes the emotional ties that all marriages should have, and theirs did. Churchill once described his marriage: “Here firm, though all be drifting.” Fortunately for him, it really was. Give BBC and HBO a tip of the hat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>http://localhost:8080/gathering-storm-finney/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
