<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Boris Says the Strangest Things	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://localhost:8080/boris/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://localhost:8080/boris</link>
	<description>Senior Fellow, Hillsdale College Churchill Project, Writer and Historian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2022 18:23:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim Young		</title>
		<link>http://localhost:8080/boris#comment-32420</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Young]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2019 08:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardlangworth.com/?p=2946#comment-32420</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Another factual mistake in &lt;em&gt;The Churchill Factor&lt;/em&gt; is the description of HMS 	&lt;em&gt;Belfast&lt;/em&gt; as a Battle Cruiser. She is of course a Cruiser, and with six-inch guns she is a light cruiser. A Battle Cruiser was a design from the end of WW1 which was battleship sized with battleship fifteen-inch guns but with lighter armour for higher speed (the speed of a Cruiser). HMS &lt;em&gt;Hood&lt;/em&gt; would be the most famous example, &lt;em&gt;Repulse&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Renown&lt;/em&gt; were others. A Battle Cruiser would be nearly twice the size of HMS &lt;em&gt;Belfast&lt;/em&gt;, closer to the size of a modern American aircraft carrier.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another factual mistake in <em>The Churchill Factor</em> is the description of HMS 	<em>Belfast</em> as a Battle Cruiser. She is of course a Cruiser, and with six-inch guns she is a light cruiser. A Battle Cruiser was a design from the end of WW1 which was battleship sized with battleship fifteen-inch guns but with lighter armour for higher speed (the speed of a Cruiser). HMS <em>Hood</em> would be the most famous example, <em>Repulse</em> and <em>Renown</em> were others. A Battle Cruiser would be nearly twice the size of HMS <em>Belfast</em>, closer to the size of a modern American aircraft carrier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Langworth		</title>
		<link>http://localhost:8080/boris#comment-12842</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Langworth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardlangworth.com/?p=2946#comment-12842</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://localhost:8080/boris#comment-12781&quot;&gt;Judith Underwood&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank-you. For more myth-skewering see: https://richardlangworth.com/churchill-myth-and-reality]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://localhost:8080/boris#comment-12781">Judith Underwood</a>.</p>
<p>Thank-you. For more myth-skewering see: <a href="https://richardlangworth.com/churchill-myth-and-reality" rel="nofollow ugc">https://richardlangworth.com/churchill-myth-and-reality</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Judith Underwood		</title>
		<link>http://localhost:8080/boris#comment-12781</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Judith Underwood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 23:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardlangworth.com/?p=2946#comment-12781</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you for your vigilance regarding Churchill&#039;s detractors.  As I made my way through The Churchill Factor, my hero was beginning to fall off the pedestal I put him on.  Could it be Johnson is attempting to emulate the charm of Churchill to which Johnson critically attributes Churchill&#039;s successes?  Though I enjoyed the book, Major Johnson falls short.  WSC has returned to his noble upright position, high on his pedestal.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your vigilance regarding Churchill’s detractors.  As I made my way through The Churchill Factor, my hero was beginning to fall off the pedestal I put him on.  Could it be Johnson is attempting to emulate the charm of Churchill to which Johnson critically attributes Churchill’s successes?  Though I enjoyed the book, Major Johnson falls short.  WSC has returned to his noble upright position, high on his pedestal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Churchill Funeral vs March in Paris? - Richard M. Langworth		</title>
		<link>http://localhost:8080/boris#comment-8934</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Churchill Funeral vs March in Paris? - Richard M. Langworth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardlangworth.com/?p=2946#comment-8934</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Paris with Pres­i­dent John­son skip­ping the 1965 Churchill funeral. The John­son story has gone around a lot lately, but it is nei­ther accu­rate nor a fair [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Paris with Pres­i­dent John­son skip­ping the 1965 Churchill funeral. The John­son story has gone around a&nbsp;lot lately, but it is nei­ther accu­rate nor a&nbsp;fair […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
