<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Turkey Archives - Richard M. Langworth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://localhost:8080/tag/turkey/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://localhost:8080/tag/turkey</link>
	<description>Senior Fellow, Hillsdale College Churchill Project, Writer and Historian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jan 2025 17:12:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>How “Goeben” Changed History, by Dal Newfield</title>
		<link>http://localhost:8080/goeben-newfield</link>
					<comments>http://localhost:8080/goeben-newfield#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard M. Langworth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 14:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winston S. Churchill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dalton Newfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goeben]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://richardlangworth.com/?p=14889</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An obscure "What-If" of history: Had Goeben not passed the Dardanelles, it was very possible Turkey would have remained neutral in WW1. Absent Turkey, the Allies lost their only supply route to Russia. This loss was so serious that in 1915 Churchill felt it imperative to assault the Dardanelles. The resulting debacle was the principal reason Churchill was ousted from the Admiralty. Because of Goeben, the Russian armies starved for food and materiel. The Czar fell and the Bolsheviks took over.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><em>It is 40 years since this </em>Goeben<em> story, and the passing of its author. Without Dalton Newfield there never would have been an International Churchill Society—at least not the one many of us knew, worked for and cherished for long years. </em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>The organization arose from an unlikely pastime—philately. It attracted Dal’s interest because, while a devoted all-purpose “Churchillian,” he was also a stamp collector. His enthusiasm was infectious, combining an encyclopedic knowledge of Churchill with our own passing interest in Churchill commemorative postage stamps.</em></p>
<figure id="attachment_10561" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-10561" style="width: 377px" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="https://richardlangworth.com/churchill-official-biography/2-newfield" rel="attachment wp-att-10561"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class=" wp-image-10561" src="https://richardlangworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/2-Newfield.jpg" alt="Official Biography" width="377" height="223"></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-10561" class="wp-caption-text">Dal Newfield at his retirement party, Sacramento, 1981.</figcaption></figure>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Newfield created an informative adjunct to Churchill philately with w</em><em>hat he called “CRs”—Churchill-related stamps not depicting him but closely involving him. They were a mainstay of the original Churchill Study Unit until it morphed into the larger Churchill Society. That too, was the work of Dal Newfield, who realized that stamps were but a blip in the Churchill story—that a broader approach was indicated.</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Dal’s imagination produced many “CR” stories, among which this was most intriguing. It features the German battlecruiser</em> Goeben,<em> later the Turkish flagship </em>Yavuz. <em>It involves </em><em>fateful decisions by the British Admiralty, and their effect on career of Churchill—which the activities of</em> Goeben<em> almost stopped in its tracks.</em></p>
<h3 style="text-align: center;">“For Want of a Nail”: The&nbsp;<em>Goeben</em> Story</h3>
<h3 style="text-align: center;">by Dalton Newfield</h3>
<p>In the early years of the 20th Century, Turkey was known as “The Sick Man of Europe,” torn between rival factions, between old and new worlds. On one side was <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mehmed_V">Sultan Mehmed V</a> and the conservatives. On the other was <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enver_Pasha">Enver Pasha</a>‘s group, the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_Turks">Young Turks</a>. They agreed about one thing: Russia must be ousted from the Caucasus.</p>
<p>Raising money by popular subscription, Turkey ordered two <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreadnought">Dreadnought-class</a> battlecruisers from Britain. They also asked the British to modernize their fleet, and the Germans to modernize their army.</p>
<p>By 1914 Winston Churchill, First Lord of the Admiralty, was bringing England’s navy up to fighting trim. War was imminent, and the Turkish ships were almost complete. In fact, the crew of one was already standing by to take over. Churchill, unsure of Turkey, decided to commandeer the ships for the Royal Navy.</p>
<p>War between France and Germany was declared on August 3rd. The Turks, divided, were in a quandary. Enver Pasha, on his own, signed an alliance with Germany. The next day, panic stricken, he tried to make an alliance with Russia! Sultan Mehmed V stood fast for neutrality.</p>
<h3>Drama in the Med</h3>
<figure id="attachment_14903" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-14903" style="width: 453px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://richardlangworth.com/goeben-newfield/1911mar3goeben" rel="attachment wp-att-14903"><img decoding="async" class=" wp-image-14903" src="https://richardlangworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/1911Mar3Goeben-300x116.jpg" alt="Goeben" width="453" height="175" srcset="http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/1911Mar3Goeben-300x116.jpg 300w, http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/1911Mar3Goeben-768x298.jpg 768w, http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/1911Mar3Goeben-604x234.jpg 604w, http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/1911Mar3Goeben.jpg 797w" sizes="(max-width: 453px) 100vw, 453px"></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-14903" class="wp-caption-text">SMS Goeben steaming at flank speed, 1911. (German Federal Archives)</figcaption></figure>
<p>One of France’s best army corps was in North Africa, and with war threatening was needed back in France. To protect the crossing, France had a powerful navy. But the swiftest capital ship in the Mediterranean was SMS (Seiner Majestät Schiff)&nbsp;<em>Goeben</em>, a two-year-old German battlecruiser. She had just finished refitting in Pola, the Austro-Hungarian navy base on the Adriatic. <em>Goeben</em> was capable of making mincemeat of the French convoys.</p>
<p>On 30 March 1914, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkeley_Milne">Admiral Lord Berkeley Milne</a>, Commander-in-Chief of the British Mediterranean fleet, received new orders. Even then, war scares were prevalent. Milne’s primary mission was to protect French convoys from <em>Goeben,</em> and not to let <em>Goeben</em> escape into the Atlantic. This was tall order, since war had not yet been declared by any country.</p>
<p>Milne sent a force of light warships under <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Troubridge">Admiral Charles Troubridge</a> toward the mouth of the Adriatic. He concentrated the rest of his forces including HMS <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Indomitable_(1907)"><em>Indomitable</em></a> and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Indefatigable_(1909)"><em>Indefatigable</em></a>, at Malta. Together the two forces were capable of destroying <em>Goeben</em>.</p>
<p>Then the French had second thoughts about crossing the Mediterranean at this time. Inexplicably, they did not tell the British of this decision. Next, Italy declared herself neutral and Britain informed Italy that she would respect her neutrality within six miles from Italian shores.</p>
<h3>Easy prey</h3>
<p>On August 2nd <em>Goeben</em> coaled at Messina, then, with her accompanying cruiser SMS <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMS_Breslau"><em>Breslau,</em></a> bombarded the French North African ports of Bone and Philippeville. On that day Britain sent an ultimatum to Germany: Get out of Belgium by midnight. At about 3pm, west of Sicily, <em>Goeben</em> passed within 10,000 yards of <em>Indomitable</em> and <em>Indefatigable—</em>easy prey for the British, who could fire three times more metal at <em>Goeben</em> than she could return. Troubridge regretted that the German admiral’s flag was not flying. Otherwise he would have fired a salute which, in view of the tense situation, might have precipitated war on the spot.</p>
<p>In London, Churchill and the Secretary of State for War, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Kitchener,_1st_Earl_Kitchener">Lord Kitchener,</a> begged the Prime Minister, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._H._Asquith">H.H. Asquith</a>, to allow the British warships to strike. Asquith agreed, but the Cabinet declared it would not be “cricket” to fire before the British ultimatum expired on August 4th. The German ships steamed away unmolested.</p>
<p><em>Goeben</em> returned to Messina where she topped off her bunkers. Again, the British could have sunk her with little trouble. Again, it was decided that to attack her inside Italy’s six-mile limit was unsporting.</p>
<p>German <span title="German-language text"><i lang="de">Konteradmiral</i></span>&nbsp;<a title="Wilhelm Souchon" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_Souchon">Wilhelm Souchon</a> made out his will and sailed south out of Messina, to what he was sure would now be the long-awaited British attack and his almost certain death. To his surprise, only light cruisers awaited him. Milne’s force was still to the west, screening nonexistent French convoys!</p>
<h3>Escape of <em>Goeben</em></h3>
<figure id="attachment_14898" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-14898" style="width: 478px" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="https://richardlangworth.com/goeben-newfield/tumblercom" rel="attachment wp-att-14898"><img decoding="async" class=" wp-image-14898" src="https://richardlangworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/TumblerCom-300x200.jpg" alt="Goeben" width="478" height="318" srcset="http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/TumblerCom-300x200.jpg 300w, http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/TumblerCom-1024x681.jpg 1024w, http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/TumblerCom-768x511.jpg 768w, http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/TumblerCom-406x270.jpg 406w, http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/TumblerCom-scaled.jpg 1038w" sizes="(max-width: 478px) 100vw, 478px"></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-14898" class="wp-caption-text">Click to enlarge map. (Tumblr.com)</figcaption></figure>
<p>Then the second inexplicable incident occurred: <em>Indomitable</em> needed coal, but Milne, instead of sending her to Malta—where the operation would take less time and from where she could cover Messina and the Adriatic—sent her to Bizerte, North Africa. There she was well out of the action. <em>Goeben</em> and <em>Breslau s</em>ailed for Pola at the head of the Adriatic, with only Troubridge’s light warships in their way.</p>
<p>Suddenly the German ships altered course to the east-southeast. Admiral Souchon had been advised of the chances of a German alliance with Turkey. The British, still ignorant of the situation, were puzzled. Milne gave Troubridge no orders, so finally he decided to give chase, hoping to get in at least a crippling blow before daylight.</p>
<p>Then the third inexplicable event occurred. Troubridge had 16 vessels, far more than <em>Goeben</em> could sink with the ammunition in her hold. Despite this advantage, Troubridge decided the odds were against him, and turned back to the Adriatic! Milne, by then, was coming up at flank speed.</p>
<p>Then the fourth inexplicable event occurred: A clerk in the Admiralty office, without any authority at all, radioed that war had been declared against Austria-Hungary. Milne’s orders were clear. He reversed his course and headed for Malta. It was 24 hours before Milne’s course was noted and reversed. Except that the British still could not imagine where <em>Goeben</em> was headed, the chase now looked hopeless. But was it?</p>
<h3>Another opportunity lost</h3>
<p>In Constantinople Enver Pasha and Sultan Mehmed were still at odds. For almost two days <em>Goeben</em> and <em>Breslau </em>wandered about the Greek islands, awaiting permission to pass into the Dardanelles. Finally they were allowed through. With her arrival, Turkey’s alliance with Germany was sealed.</p>
<p>Still the British did not know of the alliance. Winston Churchill protested the presence of <em>Goeben</em> in a “neutral” port, demanding she be interned. Germany responded by announcing that <em>Goeben</em> and <em>Breslau </em>had been “sold” to Turkey. It was a blatant ruse that Churchill recognized. He ordered her sunk if she came out, “regardless of what flag she flew.”</p>
<figure id="attachment_14897" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-14897" style="width: 349px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://richardlangworth.com/goeben-newfield/turkey-994" rel="attachment wp-att-14897"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class=" wp-image-14897" src="https://richardlangworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Turkey-994.jpg" alt="Goeben" width="349" height="226"></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-14897" class="wp-caption-text">TCG Yavuz, subject of this article on “Churchill-related” stamps. (Scott #994)</figcaption></figure>
<p>On October 27th <em>Goeben</em>, in company with the Turkish Navy, steamed into the Black Sea, bombarded the Russian fortress of Sevastopol, sank a transport, raided Odessa, torpedoed a gunboat and practically destroyed Novorossiysk, its oil tanks and all the shipping in port. At last the British declared war on Turkey.</p>
<h3>“For want of a nail…”</h3>
<p>But why is a Turkish commemorative showing the battlecruiser <em>Yavuz</em> a Churchill-related postage stamp?</p>
<p>Had <em>Goeben</em> not passed the Dardanelles, it was very possible Turkey would have remained neutral in the First World War. Absent Turkey, the Allies lost their only supply route to Russia. This loss was so serious that in 1915 Churchill felt it imperative to assault the Dardanelles. The resulting debacle was the principal reason Churchill was ousted from the Admiralty. Because of <em>Goeben</em>, the Russian armies starved for food and materiel. The Czar fell and the Bolsheviks took over. And the rest is history….</p>
<h3><em>Yavuz</em> and her fate</h3>
<figure id="attachment_14900" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-14900" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="https://richardlangworth.com/goeben-newfield/1917goeben" rel="attachment wp-att-14900"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-14900" src="https://richardlangworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/1917Goeben-300x206.jpg" alt="Goeben" width="300" height="206" srcset="http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/1917Goeben-300x206.jpg 300w, http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/1917Goeben-768x526.jpg 768w, http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/1917Goeben-394x270.jpg 394w, http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/1917Goeben.jpg 800w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px"></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-14900" class="wp-caption-text">Kaiser Wilhelm II, greeted aboard the ex-Goeben, now TCG Yavuz, during his October 1917 visit to Constantinople as a guest of the Sultan. (German Federal Archives)</figcaption></figure>
<p>After being mined several times, beached and bombed by Handley Page bombers, <em>Goeben</em> was given to the Turks in&nbsp; the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Lausanne">Treaty of Lausanne</a>. She was ultimately refitted and renamed <em>Yavuz Sultan Selim.</em> She served as flagship of the Turkish Navy until 1954.</p>
<p><em>Yavuz</em> was offered to West Germany as a museum ship in 1963, but the artifacts of the Kaiser’s war were not popular, and the offer was turned down. She was sold for scrap in 1971. <em>Yavuz </em>was the last Dreadnought in existence outside the United States and the longest-serving of all Dreadnought-class warships. She was also the last survivor of the Imperial German Navy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>http://localhost:8080/goeben-newfield/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the Turks Like Churchill</title>
		<link>http://localhost:8080/turkey-w-churchill-and-ataturk</link>
					<comments>http://localhost:8080/turkey-w-churchill-and-ataturk#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard M. Langworth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2017 19:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Quotations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winston S. Churchill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atatürk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chanak Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[İnönü]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardlangworth.com/?p=1314</guid>

					<description><![CDATA["There is a long story of the friendly relations between Great Britain and Turkey. Across it is a terrible slash of the Great War, when German intrigues and British and Turkish mistakes led to our being on opposite sides. We fought as brave and honourable opponents. But those days are done, and we move forward into a world arrangement in which peaceful peoples will have a right to be let alone and in which all peoples will have a chance to help one another."]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><em>How great was Atatürk? The question came up in a class examining Turkish attitudes to Churchill, which one might expect would be hostile. In 1914, Churchill’s Admiralty denied Turkey two battleships being built in Britain as World War I erupted. In 1915, Churchill pushed hard for (though did not conceive of) the attacks on the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_operations_in_the_Dardanelles_Campaign">Dardanelles</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gallipoli_Campaign">Gallipoli</a>. (See also “comments” on this post from thoughtful Turks.)</em></p>
<h3>Atatürk</h3>
<p>One historian speculated that Churchill mirrored the courage and resourcefulness of &nbsp;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ataturk">Mustafa Kemal</a> (Atatürk). Another said there “might be a lingering impression that Churchill had helped save Turkey from the red menace by his resistance to Russian demands on the Dardanelles. Of course it was <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Truman">Harry Truman</a> who did the heavy lifting there [through the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truman_doctrine">Truman Doctrine</a>]”</p>
<figure id="attachment_1318" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-1318" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://richardlangworth.com/turkey/escforums" rel="attachment wp-att-1318"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-1318" src="https://richardlangworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/escforums-300x201.jpg" alt="Atatürk" width="300" height="201" srcset="http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/escforums-300x201.jpg 300w, http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/escforums.jpg 320w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px"></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-1318" class="wp-caption-text">Churchill and İnönü, 1943 (Escforums, Istanbul)</figcaption></figure>
<p>The Turks have abundant reasons to feel positive toward Churchill, aside from his personal courage, and his post-1945 resistance to Soviet designs on the Dardanelles (when he was out of office and powerless).</p>
<p>Churchill’s liking for Turkey dated back to 1910, when he toured Anatolia—partly on a locomotive cow-catcher!—and “met many of the brave men who laid the foundations of modern Turkey” (as he wrote to Turkish President <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/İsmet_İnönü">Ismet İnönü</a> in 1943).</p>
<h3>Churchill’s Admiration</h3>
<p>Churchill undertook several risky trips in the Second World War. His visit to İnönü was one of them. He went to Istanbul after <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casablanca_Conference">Casablanca</a>, in a period when he was away from home four weeks.</p>
<p>Nor was the meeting entirely in vain, as he told Parliament in May 1944. Despite “an exaggerated attitude of caution,” İnönü intervened to halt chrome exports to Germany. This was more important then than it may seem now.</p>
<figure id="attachment_5616" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-5616" style="width: 297px" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="https://richardlangworth.com/turkey/gallipoliataturk" rel="attachment wp-att-5616"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-5616" src="https://richardlangworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/GallipoliAtaturk-225x300.jpg" alt="Atatürk" width="297" height="396" srcset="http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/GallipoliAtaturk-225x300.jpg 225w, http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/GallipoliAtaturk.jpg 768w, http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/GallipoliAtaturk-203x270.jpg 203w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 297px) 100vw, 297px"></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-5616" class="wp-caption-text">Turkey erected this noble monument and the Turkish consul-general unveiled a similar plaque at Anzac House, Sydney. Though its authorship is disputed, the sentiments are Lincolnesque and Churchillian.</figcaption></figure>
<p>While understanding that he ruled by <em>diktat</em>, Churchill had profound admiration for Atatürk. He wrote in 1938:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">The tears which men and women of all classes shed upon his bier were a fitting tribute to the life work of a man at once the hero, the champion, and the father of modern Turkey. During his long dictatorship a policy of admirable restraint and goodwill created, for the first time in history, most friendly relations with Greece. (<em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casablanca_Conference">Churchill by Himself</a></em><em>, </em>321).</p>
<h3>Chanak</h3>
<p>Sir Martin Gilbert’s <em>Churchill: A Life</em> (and his biographic volume IV in more detail) record Churchill’s performance in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chanak_Crisis">1922 Chanak crisis.&nbsp;</a>&nbsp;This added to his Turkish credits.</p>
<p>Churchill persistently argued, in telegrams, letters and Cabinet meetings, for a firm stance by Britain and the Dominions. But he restrained a bellicose, pro-Greece <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lloyd_George">Lloyd George</a> from acting rashly when the Turks marched toward British-occupied Chanak.</p>
<p>Eventually there was a negotiated settlement. With that, the Conservatives bolted the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lloyd_George_Coalition">Lloyd George Coalition.</a>&nbsp;This cost Lloyd George his premiership and Churchill his seat in Parliament. Martin Gilbert concludes (<em>Churchill: A&nbsp;</em><em>Life, </em>454):</p>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">Churchill saw the Chanak crisis as a successful example of how to halt aggression, and then embark on successful negotiations, by remaining firm. But “Chanak” had become the pretext not only for the fall of the Government but for one more, unjustified, charge of his own impetuosity.<span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif;"><span style="font-family: Palatino;"><br>
</span></span></p>
<h3>Meeting&nbsp;İnönü</h3>
<p>Gilbert’s <em>Churchill: A Photographic Portrait</em> records WSC’s 1943 letter above, which he handed İnönü when they met. After remembering “the brave men,” Churchill explained:</p>
<blockquote><p>There is a long story of the friendly relations between Great Britain and Turkey. Across it is a terrible slash of the last war, when German intrigues and British and Turkish mistakes led to our being on opposite sides. We fought as brave and honourable opponents.</p>
<p>But those days are done, and we and our American Allies are prepared to make vigorous exertions in order that we shall all be together…to move forward into a world arrangement in which peaceful peoples will have a right to be let alone and in which all peoples will have a chance to help one another.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not bad for the hoary old imperialist. This represents rather an improvement on some more recent western overtures to Turkey. I suspect many Turks still feel pretty good about Churchill. The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adana">Adana, Turkey</a> siding where the İnönü meeting occurred has been turned into a park dedicated to peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>http://localhost:8080/turkey-w-churchill-and-ataturk/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
