<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Churchill Factor Archives - Richard M. Langworth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://localhost:8080/tag/the-churchill-factor/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://localhost:8080/tag/the-churchill-factor</link>
	<description>Senior Fellow, Hillsdale College Churchill Project, Writer and Historian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2022 20:09:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Boris Says the Strangest Things</title>
		<link>http://localhost:8080/boris</link>
					<comments>http://localhost:8080/boris#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard M. Langworth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 22:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appearances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winston S. Churchill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alexander Cadogan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boris Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Bell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cordell Hull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dean Rusk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Destroyers-for-Bases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dwight Eisenhower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earl Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Franklin Roosevelt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Hopkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Morgenthau Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Maynard Keynes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lend-Lease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lyndon Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Gilbert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Soames]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Courtenay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Churchill Factor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Kimball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yale Club]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardlangworth.com/?p=2946</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://richardlangworth.com/boris/imgres-16" rel="attachment wp-att-4518"></a>Boris Johnson, whose book, The Churchill Factor, is feted widely, speaks his mind with a smile. Like Mr. Obama, he’s a chap I’d like to share a pint with at the local.</p>
<p>But fame and likability don’t a Churchill scholar&#160;make. And in that department, Boris Johnson needs&#160;some help.</p>
<p>His remarks are quoted from a November 14th speech at the <a href="http://www.yaleclubnyc.org/">Yale Club</a> in New York City.</p>
Boris Fact-checks
<p>1) <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lend-Lease">Lend-Lease</a>, Roosevelt’s World War II “loan” of $50 billion worth of war materiel to the Allies, “screwed” the British.</p>
<p>I queried Professor&#160;Warren Kimball of Rutgers University, editor of the <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/0691008175/?tag=richmlang-20">Churchill-Roosevelt Correspondence</a> and several books on World War II, who wrote:</p>
<p>The U.S.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://richardlangworth.com/boris/imgres-16" rel="attachment wp-att-4518"><img decoding="async" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-4518" src="https://richardlangworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/imgres-1.jpg" alt="Boris Johnson" width="259" height="194"></a>Boris Johnson, whose book, <em>The Churchill Factor,</em> is feted widely, speaks his mind with a smile. Like Mr. Obama, he’s a chap I’d like to share a pint with at the local.</p>
<p>But fame and likability don’t a Churchill scholar&nbsp;make. And in that department, Boris Johnson needs&nbsp;some help.</p>
<p>His remarks are quoted from a November 14th speech at the <a href="http://www.yaleclubnyc.org/">Yale Club</a> in New York City.</p>
<h2>Boris Fact-checks</h2>
<p><em>1) <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lend-Lease">Lend-Lease</a>, Roosevelt’s World War II “loan” of $50 billion worth of war materiel to the Allies, “screwed” the British.</em></p>
<p>I queried Professor&nbsp;Warren Kimball of Rutgers University, editor of the <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/0691008175/?tag=richmlang-20">Churchill-Roosevelt Correspondence</a> and several books on World War II, who wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>The U.S. did not construct Lend-Lease to take advantage of Britain.&nbsp;FDR and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Morgenthau,_Jr.">Treasury Secretary Morgenthau</a> rejected suggestions that America take ownership of British possessions. The initial agreement committed Britain to so-called “free” trade, aimed primarily at the Empire.&nbsp;This angered the British (including <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Maynard_Keynes">Keynes</a>), but turned out to be meaningless.</p></blockquote>
<p>Britain received 60% of&nbsp;Lend-Lease—$31.4 billion (nearly half a trillion today). Churchill regarded Lend-Lease “without question as the most unsordid act in the whole of recorded history.” (<em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00FFAZRBM/?tag=richmlang-20">Churchill By Himself</a>,&nbsp;</em>131)</p>
<h2>Destroyers or Bathtubs?</h2>
<p><em>2) Roosevelt’s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destroyers_for_Bases_Agreement">“Destroyers for Bases” deal</a> (September 1940, six months before&nbsp;Lend-Lease) was “heavily biased against Britain.” The fifty aged destroyers Britain received (in exchange for American bases on British possessions) were “useless bathtubs.”</em></p>
<p>This is both wrong and beside&nbsp;the point. Churchill said the Americans had “turned a large part&nbsp;of their gigantic industry to making munitions&nbsp;which we need. They have even given us or&nbsp;lent us valuable weapons of their own.”&nbsp;(<em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00FFAZRBM/?tag=richmlang-20">Churchill By Himself</a>, </em>129)&nbsp;Naval historian Christopher Bell, Dalhousie University, Halifax, author of <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00979XXY0/?tag=richmlang-20+bell+churchill+and+sea+power"><em>Churchill and Sea Power</em></a>, writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>Churchill was eager for the old destroyers, knowing full well that they were WW1 vintage. They nevertheless helped fill a gap at a critical time. A measure of Churchill’s determination to obtain them was his willingness (mentioned in my book) to trade one of Britain’s new battleships for them—an idea the Admiralty quickly shot down.</p></blockquote>
<p>Professor Kimball adds the major point Mayor Johnson misses:</p>
<blockquote><p>What mattered, as any thoughtful person knew and should know, is that Destroyers-for-Bases was a remarkable commitment by FDR and America to Britain’s aid—if it could hold on.&nbsp;It was seen, and was intended to be seen, as a morale builder in the UK, at a time when morale was crucial.</p></blockquote>
<h2>FDR’s Funeral</h2>
<p><em>3) Churchill did not go to Roosevelt’s funeral in 1945 because he was “miffed” at the President.</em></p>
<p>Facts: Germany was nearing surrender, in a war that had taxed Churchill and Britain for six&nbsp;years. Would <em>you</em>&nbsp;go? Yet&nbsp;Churchill’s first impulse <span style="text-decoration: underline;">was</span>&nbsp;to go. I owe these references to&nbsp;my colleague Paul Courtenay:</p>
<blockquote><p>“At the last moment I decided not to fly to Roosevelt’s funeral on account of much that was going on here.” (Churchill to his wife in Mary Soames, <em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/0395963192/?tag=richmlang-20+personal+letters">Personal Letters</a>, </em>526). “Everyone here thought my duty next week lay at home.” (Churchill to FDR confidant Harry Hopkins in Martin Gilbert, <a href="https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/store/"><em>Winston S. Churchill</em> </a>VII: 1294.) “P.M. of course wanted to go. A[nthony Eden] thought they oughtn’t both to be away together….P.M. says he’ll go and A. can stay. I told A. that, if P.M. goes, <em>he must. </em>Churchill regretted in after years that he allowed himself to be persuaded not to go.” (<a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/0399102108/?tag=richmlang-20+diaries"><em>Diaries of Alexander Cadogan</em></a>, 727.)</p></blockquote>
<p><em>4) Remembering Churchill’s “snub” of the Roosevelt&nbsp;funeral, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyndon_B._Johnson">President Johnson</a> took revenge by not attending Churchill’s funeral in 1965.</em></p>
<p>No: The President was suffering from a bad case of the flu. He sent <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earl_Warren">Chief Justice Earl Warren</a> and Secretary of State&nbsp;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dean_Rusk">Dean Rusk</a>. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwight_D._Eisenhower">President Eisenhower</a> joined them and gave a moving eulogy on the BBC. President Johnson said: “When there was darkness in the world…a generous Providence gave us Winston Churchill…. He is history’s child, and what he said and what he did will never die.”</p>
<h2>Misquotes</h2>
<p>Boris&nbsp;repeated several alleged Churchill quotations on which “I ‘eard different” from eye-witnesses.</p>
<p>“I’ll kiss him on both cheeks—or all four if you prefer.” The object of that crack was De Gaulle, not the Americans. “Proud to be British” involved an old man making improper advances to a young lady, not the way Johnson spins it. Of course Churchill, who often stored and retreaded favorite wisecracks, might have said the same thing at different times.</p>
<p>On the big issues, though, it would be a nice thing if Boris&nbsp;would run his statements past a scholar, lest they add to the cacophony of Churchill tall stories that pollute&nbsp;the Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>http://localhost:8080/boris/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boris: What Winston Would Do, Part 13,783</title>
		<link>http://localhost:8080/johnson</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard M. Langworth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2014 15:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winston S. Churchill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Montague Browne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boris Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaby Wood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lloyd George]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Soames]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Churchill Factor]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardlangworth.com/?p=2893</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Colorful politicians willing to say what they really think are rare prizes. But publishing a book on Churchill doesn't convey the right to judge what he would do today. The answer Lady Soames always gave when people said such things was: "How do you know?"]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure id="attachment_2894" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-2894" style="width: 175px" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="http://richardlangworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/220px-Boris_Johnson_-opening_bell_at_NASDAQ-14Sept2009-3c_cropped.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="wp-image-2894 " src="http://richardlangworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/220px-Boris_Johnson_-opening_bell_at_NASDAQ-14Sept2009-3c_cropped.jpg" alt="220px-Boris_Johnson_-opening_bell_at_NASDAQ-14Sept2009-3c_cropped" width="175" height="198"></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-2894" class="wp-caption-text">Mayor Johnson</figcaption></figure>
<h3>Johnson breaks the Commandment</h3>
<p>London Mayor Boris Johnson has disobeyed the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Soames,_Baroness_Soames">Lady Soames</a> Commandment: <em>“Thou shall not say what my father would do today.”</em>&nbsp;May the fleas of a thousand camels infest his pyjamas.</p>
<div>
<p>During a <em>Daily Telegraph</em> readers Q&amp;A to launch Johnson’s new book, <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/1444783033/?tag=richmlang-20"><em>The Churchill Factor</em></a>, <em>Telegraph</em> Head of Books Gaby Wood&nbsp;asked the Mayor what “we could take from Churchill&nbsp;today” and whether Islamofascism was an equivalent threat to the Nazis.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Mr. Johnson said he did not know whether Churchill would get involved in Iraq. But, he added, “I think he would have been in favour of air power. I think air strikes but not boots on the ground is my hunch on where he would have been because he wasn’t obsessed with foreign entanglements.”</p>
<h3>Foreign adventures</h3>
<p>Well, he was obsessed enough in the 1930s to argue for&nbsp;foreign entanglements (France, Russia, USA)&nbsp;when his country was in danger. But Mr. Johnson’s theory&nbsp;does have some basis in earlier history. During the 1920s Churchill favored air power not troops to quell rebellious tribesmen in Iraq. Of course, air power and “boots on the ground” were rather more primitive operations&nbsp;ninety years ago, and the situation is not at all congruent—which is why Mary Soames always emphasized&nbsp;her Commandment.</p>
<p>If you want to consider what Churchill thought&nbsp;<em><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">then</span>,</strong></em> you are cordially invited to do so. Whether it has any application now you may decide for yourself:</p>
<blockquote>
<p class="p1">There is something very sinister to my mind in&nbsp;this Mesopotamian entanglement….[We seem] compelled to go on pouring armies and treasure&nbsp;into these thankless deserts….Week after week and month after&nbsp;month for a long time to come we shall have a&nbsp;continuance of this miserable, wasteful,&nbsp;sporadic warfare, marked from time to time&nbsp;certainly by minor disasters and cuttings off of&nbsp;troops and agents, and very possibly attended&nbsp;by some very grave occurrence. (Unsent letter to Prime Minister <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Lloyd_George">Lloyd George</a>, 31 August 1920.)</p>
<p class="p1">We are paying eight millions a year [£200 million today] for the&nbsp;privilege of living on an ungrateful volcano&nbsp;out of which we are in no circumstances to get&nbsp;anything worth having. (Ditto, 1 September 1922.)</p>
</blockquote>
<h3>Reality check</h3>
<p class="p1">Want a bit of general Middle East philosophy? That mightbe worth considering, I recommend also a personal favorite, to his Private Secretary in 1958:</p>
<blockquote>
<p class="p1">The Middle East is one of the hardest-hearted&nbsp;areas in the world. It has always been fought&nbsp;over, and peace has only reigned when a&nbsp;major power has established firm influence&nbsp;and shown that it would maintain its will.&nbsp;Your friends must be supported with every&nbsp;vigour and if necessary they must be&nbsp;avenged. Force, or perhaps force and bribery,&nbsp;are the only things that will be respected. It is&nbsp;very sad, but we had all better recognise it. At&nbsp;present our friendship is not valued, and our enmity is not feared. (Anthony Montague Browne,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/0955948304/?tag=richmlang-20">Long Sunset</a>, 166-67.)</p>
</blockquote>
<p class="p1">Colorful politicians willing to say what they really think are rare prizes. But publishing a book on Churchill doesn’t convey the right to judge what he would do today. The answer Lady Soames always gave when people said such things was: “How do <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><em>you</em></strong></span> know?”</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
