Exhibited at Hillsdale College

In the 1970s, Sarah Churchill was involved in the commercial publication of a series of twenty-eight intaglio drawings by Curtis Hooper entitled, “A Visual Philosophy of Sir Winston Churchill.”  The drawings were based upon famous Churchill photographs and Sarah supplied suitable quotations for each.

Decades have passed since Sir Winston’s death, but Curtis Hooper’s dramatic graphite drawings are as lifelike as ever. “While many only know Churchill for his wartime leadership, the ‘Visual Philosophy’ series is unique in that it contains vignettes drawn from throughout his entire life,” said Churchill Fellow and Hillsdale senior Ross Hatley.

In October and November 2018, the Hillsdale College proudly displayed not only the total collection of intaglio prints, but the original artwork for each. The exhibit was at Hillsdale’s Daughtery Gallery. It was part of a regular rotating schedule of art exhibits by students, faculty, and from the College’s collections. For the current schedule, click here.

Hooper Background

I am often asked about these drawings by collectors wishing to know what they are worth. I am qualified neither to appraise art nor to testify to its genuinity, but I have talked to Mr. Hooper and offer what we know herewith.

Each picture was based on a famous photograph of Sir Winston. They range from childhood to old age. The publisher was Graphic House in New Jersey, and the scheme was quite successful.

Each print carries Churchill quotation and the signatures of Sarah Churchill and Curtis Hooper. Each was numbered, and presented with a debossed coat of arms and Churchill quotation. (One exception was the print at left, which was assigned a quotation written by Sarah.)

The published format was 22 1/2″ x 34 1/2″. Some sources say each print had an edition of 400, some prints indicate 300. In fact the actual number produced is much lower (see below).

Varieties

These prints exist (also signed in pencil by Sarah) in smaller format, about the size of a sheet of U.S. stationery. But they were not part of the original project and appear to be reproductions. Indeed the pencil signature may not actually be hers. Also, some of large format prints now offered could be reproductions.

According to Mr. Hooper, genuine large-format versions must carry both his signature and Sarah Churchill’s. As always with all fine art, one should buy from a reputable dealer who is able to supply provenance and assure authenticity.

Aside from the Hillsdale collection, few full sets of full-size prints exist, but the smaller versions seem to be very numerous. Since the latter are not originals, they carry no authenticity and no great value. The larger prints, properly authenticated, are worth much more.

There is a huge residual interest in the “Visual Philosophy” series today, over four decades on. Many of the finest Churchill collections exhibit them.  I am very glad that Hillsdale has acquired this collection, which will inspire new generations of Churchillians.

This quotation is now going around the web, broadly attrib­uted to Churchill. Is it accu­rate? “Social­ism is a phi­los­o­phy of fail­ure, the creed of igno­rance, and the gospel of envy, its inher­ent virtue is the equal shar­ing of misery.” —M.S. via email.

It is more or less correct, but it’s a truncated version of two separate comments, run together to make them more interesting (in the eye of the drafter).

“Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy.” —Perth, Scotland, 28 May 1948, in Churchill, Europe Unite: Speeches 1947 & 1948 (London: Cassell, 1950), 347.

“The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings. The inherent virtue of Socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.” —House of Commons, 22 October 1945

A variation on the above is: “I do not at all wonder that British youth is in revolt against the morbid doctrine that nothing matters but the equal sharing of miseries, that what used to be called the ‘submerged tenth’ can only be rescued by bringing the other nine-tenths down to their level…” —House of Commons, 13 June 1948

Churchill’s legacy includes his philippics against socialism, said the late Dr. Harry Jaffa,

which are no less trenchant than those against fascism and Communism. Consider the following excerpts from a speech in the Commons in 1949: “I was brought up to believe that taxation is a bad thing, but the consuming power of the people a good thing. I was brought up to believe that trade should be regulated mainly by the laws of supply and demand and that, apart from basic necessaries in great emergencies, the price mechanism should adjust and correct undue spending at home….I was also taught that it was one of the first duties of Government to promote that confidence on which credit and thrift….can alone stand and grow. I was taught to believe that these processes, working freely within the limits of the well-known laws for correcting monopoly….would produce a lively and continuous improvement in prosperity. I still hold to those general principles.

“Socialists [on the other hand] regard taxation as good in itself and as tending to level our society….Everything possible is done discourage and stigmatize the inventor. The Chancellor [of the Exchequer] speaks in slighting terms of profit earners….What a lot of contempt he put into it—”profit earners.” There was an old Gladstonian expression: ‘Let the money fructify in the pockets of the people.’ That is regarded as a monstrous device of a decadent capitalist system.”

This moreover puts us in mind of that dictum concerning property asserted by the Father of the American Constitution, James Madison, when he said, in the Tenth Federalist, that “the protection of different and unequal faculties of acquiring property [is] the first object of government.” One might add that according to Madison, the U.S. Constitution is intended to provide equal protection to unequal abilities. This is just as surely what Abraham Lincoln meant when in 1864 he wrote to the Workingmen’s Association of New York that “Property is the fruit of labor; property is desirable; it is a positive good in the world. That some should be rich shows that others may become rich, and hence is just encouragement to industry and enterprise.” *

* Harry V. Jaffa, “Requiem for Socialism and the Iron Curtain,” Remarks on Churchill’s Birthday, 30 November 1990.