<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Edmund Burke Archives - Richard M. Langworth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://localhost:8080/tag/edmund-burke/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://localhost:8080/tag/edmund-burke</link>
	<description>Senior Fellow, Hillsdale College Churchill Project, Writer and Historian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2024 20:19:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Churchill and Burke: “Spontaneous Humour, Unparaded Erudition”</title>
		<link>http://localhost:8080/edmund-burke</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard M. Langworth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 17:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Literary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winston S. Churchill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Churchill by Himself]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Thornton-Kemsley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edmund Burke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malakand Field Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neville Chamberlain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Criterion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The River War]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://richardlangworth.com/?p=12483</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[1. Roberts on Burke
<p>Reprised below are my small contributions on Churchill and the great Irish statesman and thinker <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_Burke">Edmund Burke</a> (1729-1797). It was eclipsed in 2019 in a brilliant speech by Andrew Roberts which the Hillsdale College Churchill Project offers <a href="https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/burke-award-roberts/">here</a>. Dr. Roberts spoke after receiving <a href="https://www.newcriterion.com/">The New Criterion</a> 7th Edmund Burke Award for Service to Culture and Society. He&#160;also discusses Churchill on Burke in a video interview with James Panero.</p>
2. Churchill on Burke
<p>A reader writes:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">I’d like to congratulate you on <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/1586486381/?tag=richmlang-20">Churchill by Himself</a>, but I could not find any Churchill comments on Edmund Burke in the index.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>1. Roberts on Burke</h3>
<p><em>Reprised below are my small contributions on Churchill and the great Irish statesman and thinker <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_Burke">Edmund Burke</a> (1729-1797). It was eclipsed in 2019 in a brilliant speech by <strong>Andrew Roberts</strong> which the Hillsdale College Churchill Project offers <a href="https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/burke-award-roberts/">here</a>. Dr. Roberts spoke after receiving <a href="https://www.newcriterion.com/">The New Criterion</a> 7th Edmund Burke Award for Service to Culture and Society. He&nbsp;also discusses Churchill on Burke in a video interview with James Panero.</em></p>
<h3>2. Churchill on Burke</h3>
<p>A reader writes:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">I’d like to congratulate you on <em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/1586486381/?tag=richmlang-20">Churchill by Himself</a></em>, but I could not find any Churchill comments on Edmund Burke in the index. I thought Burke deserved a mention, but it’s your book, so it’s your call (and may I add, it has been one of the best treasures that has ever landed on my lap!)&nbsp; —V.T., England</p>
<p>Thanks for the kind words. Unfortunately the index is the worst feature of the book, and completely missed Burke. The 2016 Rosetta ebook,&nbsp;<em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07H14B8ZH/?tag=richmlang-20+churchill+by+himself&amp;qid=1628178926&amp;s=books&amp;sr=1-2">Churchill in His Own Words</a>,</em> is of course searchable. Both it and the 2012 <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/0091933366/?tag=richmlang-20">international edition</a>&nbsp;also contain a useful phrase index. Click these links or see the revolving books to the right &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;.</p>
<p>Despite the index’s silence, there are five Churchill quotes on Burke, and a sixth by an observer….</p>
<h3>1897: “What shadows we are…”</h3>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">Looking at these shapeless forms, confined in a regulation blanket, the pride of race, the pomp of empire, the glory of war appeared but the faint and unsubstantial fabric of a dream; and I could not help realising with Burke: “What shadows we are and what shadows we pursue.”</p>
<p>Churchill was writing here of British dead in the campaign in the Northwest Frontier of India. (See <a href="https://www.amazon.com/s?k=churchill%2C+malakand+field+force&amp;i=stripbooks&amp;ref=nb_sb_noss"><em>The Story of the Malakand Field Force</em></a>.) He nonetheless admired valiant enemies, like the Dervishes in <a href="https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/river-war-new-edition/"><em>The River War</em></a>: “…their claim beyond the grave in respect of a valiant death was not less good than that which any of our countrymen could make.”</p>
<h3>1939: “Importunate chink” of grasshoppers</h3>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">[Burke said:] “Because half-a-dozen grasshoppers under a fern make the field ring with their importunate chink, whilst thousands of great cattle repose beneath the shadow of the British oak, chew the cud and are silent, pray do not imagine that those who make the noise are the only inhabitants of the field, that of course they are many in number; or that, after all, they are other than the little shrivelled, meagre, hopping, though loud and troublesome insects of the hour.”</p>
<p>Churchill was quoting Burke to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colin_Thornton-Kemsley">Colin Thornton-Kemsley</a>, chairman of the Chigwell Conservative Association, who wanted to dismiss WSC for his anti-<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neville_chamberlain">Chamberlain</a> rhetoric. When Churchill became prime minister, Thornton-Kemsley sent him his apologies. “I want to say only this,” he wrote. “You warned us repeatedly about the German danger and you were right: a grasshopper under a fern is not proud now that he made the field ring with his importunate chink.”</p>
<p>Churchill replied: “I certainly think that Englishmen ought to start fair with one another from the outset in so grievous a struggle and so far as I am concerned the past is dead.”</p>
<h3>1941: Anglo-American unity</h3>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">The great Burke has truly said, “People will not look forward to posterity who never look backward to their ancestors,” and I feel it most agreeable to recall to you that the Jeromes [Churchill’s maternal forebears] were rooted for many generations in American soil, and fought in Washington’s armies for the independence of the American Colonies and the foundation of the United States. I expect I was on both sides then. And I must say I feel on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean now.</p>
<p>The BBC had actively worked to keep Churchill off the air in the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeasement">Appeasement</a> years, but by 1941 they couldn’t get enough of him. Here he is broadcasting on 16 June 1941, six days before Hitler attacked Russia. His theme, as ever, was Collective Security, and he yearned for America to enter the war.</p>
<h3>1951: “Reform without injustice”</h3>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">A generation would no doubt come to whom their miseries were unknown but it would be sure of having more to eat and bless <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/historic_figures/stalin_joseph.shtml">Stalin’s</a> name. I did not repeat Burke’s dictum, “If I cannot have reform without injustice, I will not have reform.” With the World War going on all&nbsp;round us it seemed vain to moralise aloud.</p>
<p>Churchill is here writing in his fourth volume of Second World War memoirs, <em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07XD767LJ/?tag=richmlang-20">The Hinge of Fate</a>.&nbsp;</em>WSC was never given to moralizing—or, as we hear so disgustingly often today, “virtue signaling.” Morality was prominent in his make-up, but in war for him the first priority was “Victory at all costs—Victory in spite of all terror.”</p>
<figure id="attachment_2175" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-2175" style="width: 187px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://richardlangworth.com/?attachment_id=2175" rel="attachment wp-att-2175"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-2175" src="https://richardlangworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/BrooksWiki-187x300.jpg" alt width="187" height="300" srcset="http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/BrooksWiki-187x300.jpg 187w, http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/BrooksWiki.jpeg 374w" sizes="(max-width: 187px) 100vw, 187px"></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-2175" class="wp-caption-text">Collin Brooks 1893-1959 (Wikimedia Commons)</figcaption></figure>
<h3>3. Collin Brooks: “Where gusto is the prime quality”</h3>
<p>One more reference to Burke in is on page 18. It is a lovely quotation by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collin_Brooks">Collin Brooks</a> about Churchill the conversationalist in <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B008GIMZS8/?tag=richmlang-20+churchill+by+his+contemporaries&amp;qid=1628180788&amp;s=digital-text&amp;sr=1-1"><em>Churchill by His Contemporaries</em></a> (1953). Brooks captures the quality that endeared Churchill, even to political opponents:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 80px;">“Never was a talker so variously gifted, so ardently listened-to, so little of a prig; never was a man so wedded to precision and verbal nicety so little of a pedant…. Sir Winston would have been equally welcomed by Falstaff in Eastcheap,&nbsp;Ben Jonson at The Mermaid, or Burke and <a href="http://justus.anglican.org/resources/bio/20.html">Johnson</a> at The Mitre, that is, in any coterie where the talk is masculine, the wit and humour spontaneous, the erudition unparaded, and where gusto is the prime quality.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Origins: “I’ll kiss him on all four cheeks”</title>
		<link>http://localhost:8080/kiss-four-cheeks</link>
					<comments>http://localhost:8080/kiss-four-cheeks#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard M. Langworth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FAQs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winston S. Churchill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles de Gaulle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chequers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dieppe Raid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edmund Burke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Layton Nel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invasion of North Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jane Portal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joseph Stalin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marlborough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operation Torch]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://richardlangworth.com/?p=7809</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Q: Churchill’s Kiss: A Cheeky Affair
<p>I found myself using an alleged Churchill witticism I have long known, but could not find in your book,&#160;Churchill’s Wit: The Definitive Collection (2009). As I have it, Churchill was preparing to meet <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Stalin">Marshal Stalin</a>, and a diplomatic advisor said, “He will probably expect to kiss you on both cheeks.” “Oh, that’s all right,” said Churchill, “as long as he doesn’t want to be kissed on all four.” Can you verify this one?</p>
<p>My own main area of scholarly research is <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Johnson">Samuel Johnson,</a>&#160;another subject often misattributed.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Q: Churchill’s Kiss: A Cheeky Affair</h3>
<blockquote><p>I found myself using an alleged Churchill witticism I have long known, but could not find in your book,&nbsp;<em>Churchill’s Wit: The Definitive Collection</em> (2009). As I have it, Churchill was preparing to meet <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Stalin">Marshal Stalin</a>, and a diplomatic advisor said, “He will probably expect to kiss you on both cheeks.” “Oh, that’s all right,” said Churchill, “as long as he doesn’t want to be kissed on all four.” Can you verify this one?</p>
<p>My own main area of scholarly research is <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Johnson">Samuel Johnson,</a>&nbsp;another subject often misattributed. Good quote collections more than just the quotation and its source. Your book with comprehensive coverage and thorough sourcing is impressive. That is the real guarantee of the ideas, wit or imagination of the quoted person, but of their ongoing presence in the cultural memory.&nbsp;—P.T., New Zealand</p></blockquote>
<h3>A: De Gaulle not Stalin</h3>
<p>Your query sent me on a troll of my hard drive,&nbsp; I couldn’t imagine how I left the kiss gag out! But I did. Not only in <em>Churchill’s Wit</em>, but in the unabridged original <em>Churchill by Himself</em>, from which <em>Churchill’s Wit</em> was derived.</p>
<p>However, the kiss quote above is inaccurate, and stems from something Churchill said about <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_de_Gaulle">Charles de Gaulle</a>, not Joseph Stalin:</p>
<p><strong>“All right, all right. I’ll be good. I’ll be sweet. I ‘ll kiss him on both cheeks—or all four if you’d prefer it.”</strong></p>
<h3>Source</h3>
<figure id="attachment_3312" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-3312" style="width: 398px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://richardlangworth.com/common5/nel-williamslodef" rel="attachment wp-att-3312"><img decoding="async" class="wp-image-3312" src="https://richardlangworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Nel-WilliamsLoDef-300x189.jpg" alt="Kiss" width="398" height="251" srcset="http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Nel-WilliamsLoDef-300x189.jpg 300w, http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Nel-WilliamsLoDef-1024x644.jpg 1024w, http://localhost:8080/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Nel-WilliamsLoDef.jpg 1038w" sizes="(max-width: 398px) 100vw, 398px"></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-3312" class="wp-caption-text">Former Churchill secretaries Elizabeth Layton Nel (served 1942-45) and Lady Williams, the former Jane Portal (1949-55). Paul Courtenay writes: “They met at a reception in the Cabinet War Rooms when Elizabeth was on a visit from South Africa, aged 90. I was chatting to them when an official photographer strolled by; of course he had no idea who they were so I said to him: ‘You must take a shot of these two ladies together.’ The result was charming, not to say historic.</figcaption></figure>
<p>The kiss crack was related by a highly reliable source, <a href="https://richardlangworth.com/common5">Elizabeth Layton Nel,</a> one of Churchill’s principal wartime secretaries. Her charming 1958 memoir,&nbsp;<em>Winston Churchill by His Wartime Secretary,&nbsp;</em>was recently reprinted in electronic and print editions. She was a dear lady and a faithful recounter of her experiences. She first told me the story in 1988.</p>
<p>October 1942: At <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chequers">Chequers</a>, the Prime Minister’s country residence, Churchill was preparing to receive the prickly Frenchman. There was a quandary over what to tell the General of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Torch">“Torch,” the invasion of North Africa</a>, scheduled to begin November 8th. Only a few months before, the Allies had been badly rebuffed in an abortive <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dieppe_Raid">raid on the channel port of Dieppe</a>. There was some suspicion that de Gaulle’s <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_France">Free French</a> had somehow leaked advance knowledge of the raid. The Germans had been alerted by French double agents that the British were showing interest in the area.</p>
<p>As Mrs. Nel recalled, Churchill opposed informing de Gaulle of “Torch” until afterward. His advisors warned him to be&nbsp; diplomatic. Hence the Prime Minister’s generous offer to kiss the General on all four cheeks if necessary.</p>
<h3>Churchill on Johnson</h3>
<p>Researching the quotations of Samuel Johnson work must be more challenging than than Churchill, since the latter left such copious archives. Incidentally, I found this in Keith Alldritt, <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/0091770858/?tag=richmlang-20"><em>Churchill the Writer: His Life as a Man of Letters</em></a> (1992):</p>
<blockquote><p>Writing to his wife Clementine, while off researching [<a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/0226106330/?tag=richmlang-20"><em>Marlborough</em></a>], Churchill again applied to Marlborough the word ‘sublime’, so current a word for the eighteenth-century prose stylists whom he so admired, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_Burke">Edmund Burke</a> and Samuel Johnson.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>http://localhost:8080/kiss-four-cheeks/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
