<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Churchillnomics: The “Stricken Field”	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://localhost:8080/stricken-field/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://localhost:8080/stricken-field</link>
	<description>Senior Fellow, Hillsdale College Churchill Project, Writer and Historian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 May 2021 20:17:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ron J. Ponder		</title>
		<link>http://localhost:8080/stricken-field#comment-42017</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron J. Ponder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 14:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://richardlangworth.com/?p=3401#comment-42017</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mr. Behm references this medieval chronicle. Does a reference to it exist? I cannot locate it.
.
&lt;em&gt;Mr. Behm correctly says this explanation of the term is in Martha Gelhorn&#039;s book, &lt;/em&gt;A Stricken Field&lt;em&gt;, since reprinted (see note below). You can read her remarks on her fifth page on &lt;a href=&quot;https://bit.ly/3q8bD8o&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;Googlebooks&lt;/a&gt;. Unfortunately she credits only &quot;A Medieval Chronicle,&quot; probably referring to the multi-volume work, &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Medieval Chronicle&lt;/em&gt;. Some volumes are listed on &lt;a href=&quot;https://bit.ly/3nKXLQd&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;Bookfinder.com&lt;/a&gt; but not all, and I cannot track its publishing history. I would be glad to have an exact reference. RML]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Behm references this medieval chronicle. Does a reference to it exist? I cannot locate it.<br>
.<br>
<em>Mr. Behm correctly says this explanation of the term is in Martha Gelhorn’s book, </em>A Stricken Field<em>, since reprinted (see note below). You can read her remarks on her fifth page on <a href="https://bit.ly/3q8bD8o" rel="nofollow ugc">Googlebooks</a>. Unfortunately she credits only “A Medieval Chronicle,” probably referring to the multi-volume work, </em><em>The Medieval Chronicle</em>. Some volumes are listed on <a href="https://bit.ly/3nKXLQd" rel="nofollow ugc">Bookfinder.com</a> but not all, and I cannot track its publishing history. I would be glad to have an exact reference. RML</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Langworth		</title>
		<link>http://localhost:8080/stricken-field#comment-14932</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Langworth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 17:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://richardlangworth.com/?p=3401#comment-14932</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://localhost:8080/stricken-field#comment-14931&quot;&gt;Carl Behm III&lt;/a&gt;.

According to &lt;em&gt;Ernest Hemingway: A Comprehensive Bibliography&lt;/em&gt;, by Audre Hanneman, &quot;Hemingway&#039;s anonymous epigraph for Martha Gellhorn&#039;s novel,&lt;em&gt; A Stricken Field&lt;/em&gt; [is] credited to a &#039;Medieval Chronicle.&#039;&quot; Gellhorn&#039;s novel was published in 1940, Churchill&#039;s first usage was 1903, McRae&#039;s 1895. Unless &lt;em&gt;The Medieval Chronicle&lt;/em&gt; was first published earlier, would it not be more likely that Gellhorn, like Churchill, read McRae? It would seem right up her alley.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://localhost:8080/stricken-field#comment-14931">Carl Behm III</a>.</p>
<p>According to <em>Ernest Hemingway: A Comprehensive Bibliography</em>, by Audre Hanneman, “Hemingway’s anonymous epigraph for Martha Gellhorn’s novel,<em> A Stricken Field</em> [is] credited to a ‘Medieval Chronicle.'” Gellhorn’s novel was published in 1940, Churchill’s first usage was 1903, McRae’s 1895. Unless <em>The Medieval Chronicle</em> was first published earlier, would it not be more likely that Gellhorn, like Churchill, read McRae? It would seem right up her alley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Carl Behm III		</title>
		<link>http://localhost:8080/stricken-field#comment-14931</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carl Behm III]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 17:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://richardlangworth.com/?p=3401#comment-14931</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A much earlier use of &quot;a stricken field&quot; is found in a Medieval Chronicle. See the full passage used as an epigraph by Martha Gellhorn in her novel of that title, &lt;em&gt;A Stricken Field.&lt;/em&gt; While &quot;The Unconquered Dead&quot; may have been in Churchill&#039;s mind, one wonders whether he also had read the &lt;em&gt;Chronicle&lt;/em&gt;. Certainly he shared the view of the old knight who says, &quot;...A battle is fought to be won. And it is this that happens if you lose.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A much earlier use of “a stricken field” is found in a Medieval Chronicle. See the full passage used as an epigraph by Martha Gellhorn in her novel of that title, <em>A Stricken Field.</em> While “The Unconquered Dead” may have been in Churchill’s mind, one wonders whether he also had read the <em>Chronicle</em>. Certainly he shared the view of the old knight who says, “…A battle is fought to be won. And it is this that happens if you lose.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
