Comments on: Churchill on Socialism http://localhost:8080/socialism Senior Fellow, Hillsdale College Churchill Project, Writer and Historian Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:53:16 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9 By: David chovanak http://localhost:8080/socialism#comment-57837 Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:53:16 +0000 https://richardlangworth.com/?p=3514#comment-57837 Did he say that socialism was a wonderful thing until you run out of other people’s money.?
–
No, that was Margaret Thatcher. See https://bit.ly/3QT5wmR.

]]> By: Tom Howard http://localhost:8080/socialism#comment-31728 Tue, 03 Sep 2019 08:35:09 +0000 https://richardlangworth.com/?p=3514#comment-31728 Right Ed Sanders, as “its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” Nothing else.

]]> By: Ed Sanders http://localhost:8080/socialism#comment-17427 Sat, 27 Jan 2018 17:58:21 +0000 https://richardlangworth.com/?p=3514#comment-17427 I think Churchill recognized that the evils of socialism were the seeds of poverty then war. The only peace that socialism brings is when a few have the power and suppress all the (poor) people. The only way to enforce that ideology is through force. First laws then the gun. Today in Venezuela is a good example.

]]> By: Richard Langworth http://localhost:8080/socialism#comment-11537 Mon, 20 Jul 2015 15:21:18 +0000 https://richardlangworth.com/?p=3514#comment-11537 In reply to Jacques.

Vous ne devez avoir aucune longtemps vécu.

]]> By: Jacques http://localhost:8080/socialism#comment-11536 Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:56:10 +0000 https://richardlangworth.com/?p=3514#comment-11536 Vous dites que Churchill voulait la paix du monde , qui doit être la chose la plus stupide que je l’ai entendu dans ma vie!

]]>