<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Long View: “Churchill’s Secret Affair,” Gary Oldman and the Oscars	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://localhost:8080/long-view-churchills-affiar-oscars/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://localhost:8080/long-view-churchills-affiar-oscars</link>
	<description>Senior Fellow, Hillsdale College Churchill Project, Writer and Historian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2023 20:56:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Langworth		</title>
		<link>http://localhost:8080/long-view-churchills-affiar-oscars#comment-17909</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Langworth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 18:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://richardlangworth.com/?p=6589#comment-17909</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://localhost:8080/long-view-churchills-affiar-oscars#comment-17908&quot;&gt;A. CAPET&lt;/a&gt;.

I mention Spence&#039;s book in my upcoming article for The American Spectator, but I necessarily focus on the 2018 story. One clarification Spence offers is that when Castlerosse writes WSC, &quot;I am not dangerous anymore&quot; she was referring to her divorce having been decreed. 
Spence makes various allusions to the so-called affair, none more convincing than the current article and Channel 4 television show. However, the fact that Spence published over a year before this latest version suggests that the story is not new.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://localhost:8080/long-view-churchills-affiar-oscars#comment-17908">A. CAPET</a>.</p>
<p>I mention Spence’s book in my upcoming article for The American Spectator, but I necessarily focus on the 2018 story. One clarification Spence offers is that when Castlerosse writes WSC, “I am not dangerous anymore” she was referring to her divorce having been decreed.<br>
Spence makes various allusions to the so-called affair, none more convincing than the current article and Channel 4 television show. However, the fact that Spence published over a year before this latest version suggests that the story is not new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: A. CAPET		</title>
		<link>http://localhost:8080/long-view-churchills-affiar-oscars#comment-17908</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A. CAPET]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 17:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://richardlangworth.com/?p=6589#comment-17908</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Further to Viscountess Castlerosse – in the course of my work for the Royal Historical Society today, I came across the following recent publication :
Spence, Lyndsy. The Mistress of Mayfair : Men, Money and the Marriage of Doris Delevingne. Stroud: The History Press, 2016  (223 pages,  ISBN 978-0750967150, hardback)
I wonder whether it contains any allusion to “that night with Churchill”.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further to Viscountess Castlerosse – in the course of my work for the Royal Historical Society today, I came across the following recent publication :<br>
Spence, Lyndsy. The Mistress of Mayfair : Men, Money and the Marriage of Doris Delevingne. Stroud: The History Press, 2016  (223 pages,  ISBN 978-0750967150, hardback)<br>
I wonder whether it contains any allusion to “that night with Churchill”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
