<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: “Too Easy to Be Good”: The Churchill Marriage and Lady Castlerosse	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://localhost:8080/churchill-marriage-lady-castlerosse/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://localhost:8080/churchill-marriage-lady-castlerosse</link>
	<description>Senior Fellow, Hillsdale College Churchill Project, Writer and Historian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 20:35:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Langworth		</title>
		<link>http://localhost:8080/churchill-marriage-lady-castlerosse#comment-18039</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Langworth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://richardlangworth.com/?p=6611#comment-18039</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://localhost:8080/churchill-marriage-lady-castlerosse#comment-18038&quot;&gt;Lyndsy S&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for standing up for the truth.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://localhost:8080/churchill-marriage-lady-castlerosse#comment-18038">Lyndsy S</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for standing up for the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lyndsy S		</title>
		<link>http://localhost:8080/churchill-marriage-lady-castlerosse#comment-18038</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lyndsy S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://richardlangworth.com/?p=6611#comment-18038</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you for posting this. I was in contact with the research assistant for Churchill&#039;s Secret Affair (originally titled Churchill&#039;s Secret Mistress) and I have to say I found the overall research to be shoddy. I offered insightful anecdotes regarding the &#039;affair&#039; (which I dismissed) but that doesn&#039;t make good TV, does it? You might find my blog useful: https://themitfordsociety.wordpress.com/2018/03/05/churchills-secret-affair-or-how-the-evidence-was-misrepresented/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for posting this. I was in contact with the research assistant for Churchill’s Secret Affair (originally titled Churchill’s Secret Mistress) and I have to say I found the overall research to be shoddy. I offered insightful anecdotes regarding the ‘affair’ (which I dismissed) but that doesn’t make good TV, does it? You might find my blog useful: <a href="https://themitfordsociety.wordpress.com/2018/03/05/churchills-secret-affair-or-how-the-evidence-was-misrepresented/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://themitfordsociety.wordpress.com/2018/03/05/churchills-secret-affair-or-how-the-evidence-was-misrepresented/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
