http://localhost:8080/biographers Senior Fellow, Hillsdale College Churchill Project, Writer and Historian Thu, 18 Aug 2022 20:28:27 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9 http://localhost:8080/biographers#comment-744 Wed, 15 Aug 2012 19:03:36 +0000 http://richardlangworth.com/?p=2140#comment-744 yes churchill a life was written after the publication of the colossal official biography .. 1991 .

]]> http://localhost:8080/biographers#comment-678 Wed, 07 Mar 2012 21:47:02 +0000 http://richardlangworth.com/?p=2140#comment-678 Monty, you’re forgetting Gilbert’s CHURCHILL: A LIFE (1991), which contains many facts not in the official biography.

]]> http://localhost:8080/biographers#comment-677 Wed, 07 Mar 2012 20:14:40 +0000 http://richardlangworth.com/?p=2140#comment-677 There’s a similarity between Manchester and Gilbert: neither wrote a complete cradle to grave biography of Churchill. There’s a dissimilarity within this: The biography that we rightly think of as Gilbert’s was actually started by Churchill’s son Randolph. The biography that we rightly think of as Manchester’s is being completed by another writer.

]]> http://localhost:8080/biographers#comment-676 Mon, 05 Mar 2012 15:54:08 +0000 http://richardlangworth.com/?p=2140#comment-676 i more or less agree . i think martin gilbert work is far more serious and researched . volume one of manchester is fine bit two is plagued with errors . what made manchester a good read is this inimitable style . never boring .

]]>