The Burton-Churchill Eruption: Coming Soon in Your Neighborhood
Excerpted from “Back in the News: Richard Burton’s Fraught Relationship with Winston Churchill,” for the Hillsdale College Churchill Project, June 2020. For the complete text, please click here.
The Burton – Churchill Kerfuffle
The airwaves and Twitterverse are full of Churchill bile following recent sad events that have nothing to do with him. Surfacing again are attacks half a century old by the famed actor Richard Burton. Film critic John Beaufort first reported these in the Christian Science Monitor in 1972:
December 9th, 1972— Richard Burton has just given two of the oddest and most contradictory performances of his career. Both involved his portrayal of Winston Churchill in film The Gathering Storm. The prologue consisted of two articles by the actor in TV Guide and The New York Times. Mr. Burton put on a good show as Winston Churchill, a bad show as Richard Burton.
Burton had previously expressed only admiration for Churchill. Their encounters at the Old Vic, when Burton played Hamlet, were legendary. Burton called Churchill “this religion, this flag, this insignia.” Lady Williams of Elvel, a former Churchill secretary, remembered him well: “Richard came down to the front of the stage to speak the great Shakespearean words with Churchill. The audience was ecstatic. I had the impression that Richard worshipped Sir Winston.”
“To play Churchill is to hate him…”
…was now suddenly Burton’s refrain. “Churchill and all his kind…have stalked down the corridors of endless power all through history,” he wrote. He was the “son of a Welsh miner.” Meeting Churchill was “like a blow under the heart…. My class and his hate each other to the seething point.”
The actor’s words are in vogue again. They fit well. Journalism seems largely to have parted company with old stand-by rules like “have multiple sources” or “verify your quotations.” Burton’s outburst fits today’s narrative. Churchill was a war-mongering racist imperialist who despised the poor, brown and black. Here is Burton, bending quotes a half century ago:
Churchill quote, Burton version: “They [Germans] must bleed and burn, they must be crushed into a mass of smouldering ruins.” Churchill’s actual words: “It is our interest to engage the enemy’s air power at as many points as possible to make him bleed and burn and waste on the widest fronts” (23 April 1942).
Burton: “That morbid creature, Hitler, of ferocious genius, that repository of human crime.” (Burton adds: “He might have been talking about himself.”) Churchill’s actual words: “…a maniac of ferocious genius, the repository and expression of the most virulent hatreds that have ever corroded the human breast” (The Gathering Storm, 9).
Doubling down
Burton correctly quoted “We are revolved to destroy Hitler and every vestige of the Nazi regime” (broadcast, 22 June 1941). Then he interpreted it: “What he was really saying was that ‘every vestige of the Nazi regime’ included the entire German race.” Churchill wrote of his visit to Berlin in 1945: “My hate had died with their surrender” (Triumph and Tragedy, 545).
We should be glad these were the only Churchill “quotes” in Burton’s catalogue of disdain. The rest consisted of boilerplate condemnation. Everything from despising Clement Attlee to WSC’s “baby-like, hairless, effeminate right hand, slowly slamming the table, that bizarre cadence of his curious voice: ‘We were right to fight, we were right to fight,’ I went home and had a few nightmares.” Readers possessed of reason might have had a few nightmares themselves.
Reactions
In those days we felt more confidence toward our heroes, and Burton reaped the whirlwind. The BBC Drama Department banned him for life. (Today they would probably be offering him a TV special.) In Parliament, Norman Tebbit spoke of “an actor past his peak indulging in a fit of pique, jealousy and ignorant comment.” More pointedly, Neville Trotter said: “If there were more Churchills and fewer Burtons we would be in a very much better country.”
The actor received scores of protesting letters. They went unanswered, even from friends like Robert Hardy. Instead, Burton doubled down. “Churchill has fascinated me since childhood,” he retorted—“a bogeyman who hated us, the mining class, motivelessly. He ordered a few of us to be shot, you know, and the orders were carried out.” Historian John Ramsden observed: “The myth of Tonypandy was still around to haunt Churchill’s memory.”
Why did Burton do it?
Richard Burton played to his audience. In 1962 he earned $100,000 for recording Churchill’s words in Jack Le Vien’s television series The Valiant Years. Dr. Ramsden believed he was nominated for that role by Churchill himself: “‘Get that boy from the Old Vic.’ [It was] arguably one of the best things he ever did.” Like Lady Williams, Le Vien saw in Burton only an admirer. A bust of Churchill was his treasured possession. He told both Clementine Churchill and Sir Winston’s grandson how much he admired “the old man.”
To different audiences Burton revealed other opinions. On television chat shows, Dr. Ramsden wrote, he would often emphasize: “‘I’m the son of a Welsh miner.’ Here too he was playing a part, for his lifestyle was way beyond the comprehension of Welsh miners.”
Dr. Ramsden’s final judgment is apposite: “As his career and life deteriorated around him and the fog of alcohol descended, Burton was trying desperately to play the man he had been long ago, and he at least knew what young Welshmen had been expected to believe about Winston Churchill. He was not asked to play either part again.”
Further reading
“Churchill Bio-Pics: The Trouble with the Movies”
John Ramsden quotations are from his thoughtful book Man of the Century: Winston Churchill and his Legend Since 1945 (London: HarperCollins, 2002).
One thought on “The Burton-Churchill Eruption: Coming Soon in Your Neighborhood”
Burton was correct. It was Churchill, not Hitler, who began the deliberate area bombing of civilian during World War II: [A URL is cited which is omitted; a URL is not an opinion].
=
The article you cite (2013) is exercised over bombing Germany in 1943. The first bombing of civilian populations was by the Luftwaffe over Rotterdam in 1940. The article naively states: “Up until Churchill’s appointment as prime minister [May 1940], both Germany and Britain had stuck to a pledge not to attack targets in each other’s cities where civilians were at risk.” There is no record of such a pledge and in any case the London Blitz didn’t start until September. Suggest you balance your reading of revisionist anti-bombers with more balanced analysts such Paul Addison, Geoffrey Best or Andrew Roberts. None of these historians believe Churchill was always right; but none think the Allies could have won the war with milk and rosewater. —RML