Why the Turks Like Churchill

by Richard M. Langworth on 26 July 2010

Churchill and İnönü, 1943 (esc­fo­rums, Istanbul)

A group of his­to­ri­ans asked me about Turk­ish atti­tudes to Churchill, which you would think might be hostile—since Churchill’s Admi­ralty denied Turkey two bat­tle­ships being built in Britain at the start of World War I, and WSC pushed hard (though did not invent) the attack on the Dar­d­anelles and Gal­lipoli in 1915.

One his­to­rian spec­u­lated that Churchill mir­rored the courage and resource­ful­ness of Turkey’s national hero, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. Another said there “might be a lin­ger­ing impres­sion that WSC had helped save Turkey from the red men­ace by his resis­tance to Russ­ian demands on the Dar­d­anelles Straits—of course it was Harry Tru­man who did the heavy lift­ing there [through the Tru­man Doc­trine]”

The Turks had abun­dant rea­sons to feel pos­i­tive toward Churchill, aside from his per­sonal courage, and his resis­tance to Soviet designs on the straits (when of course he was out of office and pow­er­less). They dated back to 1910 when Churchill toured the coun­try, partly on a loco­mo­tive cow-catcher, and “met many of the brave men who laid the foun­da­tions of mod­ern Turkey” (as he wrote Turk­ish Pres­i­dent Ismet İnönü in 1943).

Churchill under­took sev­eral risky trips in World War II and the visit to İnönü was one of them, after Casablanca, in a period when he was away from home four weeks. Nor was the meet­ing entirely in vain, as he told Par­lia­ment in May 1944: despite “an exag­ger­ated atti­tude of cau­tion,” İnönü had per­son­ally inter­vened to halt chrome exports to Ger­many, which was a lot more impor­tant then than it may seem now.

For details of the 1910 and 1943 meet­ings see the “Dardanelles-Gallipoli 50 Years On” fea­tures in Finest Hour 126, including Mar­tin Gilbert’s excel­lent “What about the Dar­d­anelles?”  (A .pdf is down­load­able under “pub­li­ca­tions” on The Churchill Cen­tre web­site.)

Kemal AtatürkChurchill had pro­found admi­ra­tion for Kemal Atatürk, “the only Dic­ta­tor with an aure­ole of mar­tial achieve­ment,” writ­ing in 1938: “The tears which men and women of all classes shed upon his bier were a fit­ting trib­ute to the life work of a man at once the hero, the cham­pion, and the father of mod­ern Turkey. Dur­ing his long dic­ta­tor­ship a pol­icy of admirable restraint and good­will cre­ated, for the first time in his­tory, most friendly rela­tions with Greece.” (Churchill by Him­self, 321).

Sir Mar­tin Gilbert’s Churchill: A Life (and his bio­graphic vol­ume IV in more detail) record Churchill’s per­for­mance in the 1922 Chanak cri­sis, which added to his Turk­ish cred­its. While per­sis­tently argu­ing, in telegrams, let­ters and Cab­i­net meet­ings ,for a firm stance by Britain and the Domin­ions, he restrained a bel­li­cose, pro-Greece Lloyd George from act­ing rashly when the Turks marched near British-occupied Chanak, and even­tu­ally there was a nego­ti­ated settlement—over which, of course, the Con­ser­v­a­tives bolted the Lloyd George Coali­tion, cost­ing Lloyd George his pre­mier­ship and Churchill his seat in Par­lia­ment. Mar­tin Gilbert con­cludes (CAL, 454):

Churchill saw the Chanak cri­sis as a suc­cess­ful exam­ple of how to halt aggres­sion, and then embark on suc­cess­ful nego­ti­a­tions, by remain­ing firm. But “Chanak” had become the pre­text not only for the fall of the Gov­ern­ment but for one more, unjus­ti­fied, charge of his own impetu­os­ity.

Gilbert’s Churchill: A Pho­to­graphic Por­trait records WSC’s 1943 let­ter above, which he handed İnönü when they met. After remem­ber­ing “the brave men,” Churchill continued:

There is a long story of the friendly rela­tions between Great Britain and Turkey. Across it is a ter­ri­ble slash of the last war, when Ger­man intrigues and British and Turk­ish mis­takes led to our being on oppo­site sides. We fought as brave and hon­ourable oppo­nents. But those days are done, and we and our Amer­i­can Allies are pre­pared to make vig­or­ous exer­tions in order that we shall all be together…to move for­ward into a world arrange­ment in which peace­ful peo­ples will have a right to be let alone and in which all peo­ples will have a chance to help one another.

Not bad for the hoary old impe­ri­al­ist, and a decent improve­ment on some of the more recent U.S. over­tures to Turkey. I sus­pect the Turks still feel pretty good about the old man, since the Adana, Turkey sid­ing where the İnönü meet­ing occurred has been turned into a park ded­i­cated to peace.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: