Posts tagged as:

USS Winston S. Churchill

You can read about Win­ston Churchill’s career else­where. I’d like rather to indulge in the remem­brance of a friend.

We met through the post forty-two years ago, when he became the third hon­orary mem­ber of the Churchill Study Unit, after his grand­mother and his father. The lat­ter had only just sent a let­ter of encour­age­ment to our lit­tle group of stamp col­lec­tors when he him­self died. It was June, 1968. In send­ing con­do­lences, I asked Win­ston to take his father’s place. He accepted, adding, “It is con­sol­ing to know so many share my loss.”

And for four decades “Young Win­ston” was a stal­wart sup­porter, friend and a col­lab­o­ra­tor on projects too numer­ous to recount. While kid­ding him that he was fast get­ting to be the “Not-So-Young Win­ston,” I felt he was time­less, always there for us: encour­ag­ing, prod­ding, donat­ing, par­tic­i­pat­ing. My grief at his loss, far too soon, is deeply felt.

He gave us per­mis­sion to pub­lish his grandfather’s arti­cles and speeches in Finest Hour. He appeared for speeches and pre­sen­ta­tions, from con­fer­ences to our Churchill Tours of Eng­land. He offi­ci­ated at joint cer­e­monies like the com­mis­sion­ing of USS Win­ston S. Churchill, the Amer­i­can Vet­er­ans Cen­ter, our 2006 Churchill Lec­ture. When we founded The Churchill Cen­tre in 1995, he was among the first to con­tribute to its endow­ment. He freely allowed his sig­na­ture to be used on solic­i­ta­tions, most recently in a let­ter ask­ing lapsed mem­bers to renew, which, eerily, was received by some after his death.

Like his father, he pre­ferred to com­mu­ni­cate by tele­phone, announc­ing him­self with a cheery “Win­ston here!” He would call to tell of his adven­tures, from fly­ing des­per­ate med­ical mis­sions for St. John Ambu­lance Air Wing to explor­ing scenes of his grandfather’s exploits—like the Malakand Pass, where he rode in an armoured car accom­pa­nied by sol­diers armed to the teeth. Truly, he lived life large. In Lon­don and Wash­ing­ton, he knew every­body, just like his mother. As they said of Alis­tair Cooke: “He could reach back, reach for­ward, and make the con­nec­tions. He was always, tri­umphantly, in touch.”

On one of his trips to New Eng­land, when pro­mot­ing his book of Sir Winston’s writ­ings about Amer­ica, The Great Repub­lic, we took him to visit Plimoth Plan­ta­tion. There he accosted an Indian, assur­ing him they were related, “since my grand­fa­ther was part-Iroquois.” Back in the car I let him have it: “Win­ston, you’re as Iro­quois as my cat!” “If you’re so smart,” he said, “prove it. Mean­while it’s my story and I’m run­ning with it!”

When I first vis­ited him in Lon­don, he showed me his per­sonal mem­o­ra­bilia. Here was the peer­less Orpen por­trait of his sad grand­fa­ther after the Dar­d­anelles; an orna­men­tal table once owned by John Churchill First Duke of Marl­bor­ough; a col­lec­tion of WSC’s works, all first edi­tions inscribed by his grand­fa­ther. I was a Churchill book­seller at the time, and he wanted to know what I thought of his col­lec­tion. “Well,” I said, “you’ve made a good start…..”

We had sev­eral lit­er­ary col­lab­o­ra­tions. When he assem­bled Never Give In!, his col­lec­tion of Sir Winston’s best speeches, I was able to dig out some obscure ones he needed, like his grandfather’s remarks in Dur­ban after escap­ing from the Boers in 1899. His writ­ings appeared in Finest Hour, most recently in recount­ing the heroic con­tri­bu­tions of Poles in World War II, in issue 145. Sir Mar­tin Gilbert read it with­out real­iz­ing who wrote it: “I said to myself, wow,this is really good, I won­der who wrote it (wish it had been me!)”

Our largest “com­bined oper­a­tion” was Churchill By Him­self, the book I couldn’t have pro­duced with­out his per­mis­sion. Win­ston pro­vided his grandfather’s words, I pro­vided edi­to­r­ial notes. This, I assured him, would be “a pro­duc­tion to rival South Pacific: music by W. Churchill, lyrics by R. Langworth.”

There were amus­ing adven­tures, like his call for “cigar quotes” for a com­pany pro­duc­ing a new Churchill corona. I sup­plied the quotes and he asked if I wanted to be paid. “Yes,” I said, “with a box of cig­ars.” Sniffed Win­ston: “I don’t touch the dread­ful things myself, but there’s no rea­son you shouldn’t kill your­self if you wish.” The box duly arrived with the price still on it, and I was tem­porar­ily ele­vated to smok­ing a twenty-five dol­lar corona, cour­tesy of my friend in Lon­don. (Recently I gave one to a Bahamian pal, its elab­o­rate band sparkling with a red and gilt Churchill coat of arms. He looked as if he’d received a knighthood.)

Polit­i­cal labels are all too freely applied, and some labeled Win­ston a right-winger, but his views were too com­plex to be pigeon­holed. True, he broke with Mrs. Thatcher by vot­ing against sanc­tions on Rhode­sia; he deplored the skinning-down of Britain’s armed forces; he wor­ried pub­licly over unre­stricted Com­mon­wealth immi­gra­tion and the mus­lim­iza­tion of his coun­try. But he was also pro-Europe; he strove for a more class­less soci­ety. And last year, when Barack Obama’s Cairo speech was regarded by the right as a sur­ren­der, Win­ston hailed it as a coura­geous break­through in Amer­i­can for­eign policy.

It is too easy to com­pare him to his grand­fa­ther and lament that he (or his father) were not equally great. Who was? It is most awfully untrue “that no acorn grows under a mighty oak.” There are just as many prog­eny of the great who did bet­ter than their par­ents (begin­ning of course with Sir Win­ston him­self). For every “Ran­dolph” there was a “Winston”—among the Buck­leys, the Cham­ber­lains, the Kennedys, the Sal­is­burys, the Roo­sevelts, the Roth­schilds, ad infini­tum. It’s sim­ply wrong to imply on this basis that his life was futile. Ulti­mately, most lives are.

And it is gra­tu­itous to com­pare him to his female rela­tions, since in those years, women were expected to mind their own busi­ness and per­pet­u­ate the fam­ily. The Churchill women who exceeded those roles did so through their own tal­ent and char­ac­ter. Much more was expected of the Churchill men—more, per­haps, than could be expected of any­one. The onus was upon them both: Ran­dolph, only son of Win­ston; Win­ston, only son of Randolph.

Still, with their pens, Win­ston and his father could reach heights matched by few. Were they great jour­nal­ists? Read Randolph’s first two vol­umes on his father; read Winston’s biog­ra­phy of Ran­dolph; read their joint book on the 1967 Arab-Israeli Six-Day War. The ques­tion answers itself.

Con­cern­ing his grand­fa­ther, Finest Hour once quoted Shakespeare’s Malvo­lio: “Some men are born great, some achieve great­ness, and some have great­ness thrust upon them.” Win­ston was one of those whom some tried to thrust great­ness upon. He shook it off by being himself—not what some thought he was obliged to be.

His record was one on which I think he was con­tent to be judged. Hav­ing no doubt about the ver­dict, it seems appro­pri­ate to con­clude with another quote, by Rossiter Ray­mond, which adorns the tomb­stone of  Parry Thomas, the great Welsh rac­ing dri­ver: “Life is eter­nal, and love is immortal, and death is only a horizon; and a hori­zon is noth­ing save the limit of our sight.”


{ 3 comments }

Jack Kemp, a photo inscribed to my late parents, Harriet and Michael Langworth, 1993.

Jack Kemp, a 1993 photo inscribed to Har­riet and Michael Langworth

“DASH OF GREYHOUND, SLIPPING THONGS…”

On Eleuthera, where we live from Decem­ber to April, there was vast fas­ci­na­tion, as one might expect, in the recent U.S. Pres­i­den­tial elec­tion. One of the virtues of this Bahamas island far out in the Atlantic is that racism, in the sense we all know it in the so-called First World, doesn’t really exist. On our easy-going trop­i­cal strand, amid the smiles of wel­com­ing locals and old friends who have known each other for years, it just doesn’t seem to mat­ter whether the face in front of you is black or white.

So it was per­fectly nat­ural for the wife of our local gro­cer to ask me in all inno­cence and with­out ran­cor: “Is it pos­si­ble for a non-white to be elected President?”…

…And for me to reply with­out even a thought: “Sure. In fact it was pos­si­ble twelve years ago, if the ticket had been Colin Pow­ell and Jack Kemp.”

I am firmly con­vinced it was possible—not only because Colin Pow­ell, Hon­orary Mem­ber of The Churchill Cen­tre, is a man vast num­bers of peo­ple like or admire; but because Jack Kemp, Trustee of The Churchill Cen­tre, was equally so: a politi­cian who, like Churchill, never wrote off any voter, who believed that his lib­er­tar­ian phi­los­o­phy could appeal to all, that it was the height of patron­iza­tion to sin­gle out minor­ity groups and declare that they must have more gov­ern­ment because they can­not get by with less of it.

Jack was a man who lived life at max­i­mum veloc­ity, whether as cham­pi­onship quar­ter­back for the Buf­falo Bills, as a U.S. con­gress­man who pro­moted enter­prise zones in inner cities, as an empowerment-advocating Hous­ing Sec­re­tary, or as a can­di­date for Vice Pres­i­dent who described him­self as a “bleeding-heart con­ser­v­a­tive.” But you can read all about those achieve­ments by Googling his name. I would rather write about what he meant to Churchillians.

The Tenth Inter­na­tional Churchill Con­fer­ence in 1993, chaired by Merry Albe­rigi and held in Wash­ing­ton, was one of our most stel­lar occa­sions. We wel­comed Lady Thatcher, Win­ston Churchill, Ambas­sador Kirk­patrick, Celia Sandys and Gen­eral Pow­ell. We held a ser­vice at the Wash­ing­ton Navy Yard Chapel which dupli­cated that of Roo­sevelt and Churchill at Argen­tia in August 1941, with vet­er­ans of USS Augusta and HMS Prince of Wales to read the Lessons. We hosted Ambas­sador Alan Keyes, who not only sang five national anthems includ­ing God Defend New Zealand, but all six verses of The Bat­tle Hymn of the Repub­lic—with­out music in freez­ing cold on the steps of the Lin­coln Memo­r­ial. As Churchill wrote of Argen­tia: “Every verse seemed to stir the heart. It was a great hour to live.”

Jack Kemp was our keynote speaker at that con­fer­ence. In the sum­mer 2009 issue of Finest Hour we repub­lish what he said: words of wis­dom and inspi­ra­tion, deliv­ered with the vigor for which he was known, and not with­out humor. When his intro­ducer made so bold as to com­pare him to a for­mer con­gress­man named Abra­ham Lin­coln, Jack rose in haste to dis­claim even the slight­est sim­i­lar­ity. After her appre­ci­a­tion fol­low­ing his speech Jeane Kirk­patrick and Jack embraced: old col­leagues, vet­er­ans of polit­i­cal wars, together again, even though (as Jeane told me at din­ner), they had dif­fered fer­vently over the 1982 Falk­lands War, with Jack firmly on the side of Mar­garet Thatcher and Great Britain.

Jack and his gra­cious wife Joanne were with us again at the com­mis­sion­ing of USS Win­ston S. Churchill in Nor­folk in 2001, and we dined together in the ward­room (Finest Hour 111). His last run for office was now six years past, but he was still pas­sion­ate about what The New York Times called his “most impor­tant idea….the the­ory that deep cuts in taxes would lead to such an eco­nomic boom that much if not all of the rev­enue lost from lower taxes would be off­set by the addi­tional tax receipts that resulted from greater earnings.”

“What was it that Churchill said about Supply-Side eco­nom­ics?” Jack asked between bites.

“He didn’t say any­thing about Supply-Side eco­nom­ics,” I replied. “He was a Liberal!”

“Yes he did!,” Jack retorted. “You know, about keep­ing money in people’s pockets.”

Later I looked it up and sent it to him, because of course he was right, and Churchill’s words ring as true now as when Churchill spoke them, in the House of Com­mons on 16 August 1945, although they have tem­porar­ily fallen out of favor:

What noble oppor­tu­ni­ties have the new Gov­ern­ment inher­ited! Let them be wor­thy of their for­tune, which also is the for­tune of us all. To release and lib­er­ate the vital springs of British energy and inven­tive­ness, to let the hon­est earn­ings of the nation fruc­tify in the pock­ets of the people….

In Jan­u­ary Jack Kemp announced that he had been diag­nosed with can­cer. He said he was under­go­ing tests but gave no other detail. Scarcely four months later he was gone. Imme­di­ately I thought of the words Churchill offered, as only he could, quot­ing from Adam Lind­say Gordon’s grand poem “The Last Leap,” upon the death of his dear­est friend, Lord Birken­head:

The sum­mons which reached him, and for which he was equally pre­pared, was of a dif­fer­ent order. It came as he would have wished it, swift and sud­den on the wings of speed. He had reached the last leap in his gal­lant course through life. All is over! Fleet career, Dash of grey­hound slip­ping thongs, Flight of fal­con, bound of deer, Mad hoof-thunder in our rear, Cold air rush­ing up our lungs, Din of many tongues.

Oddly too, remem­ber­ing the rapid­fire way Jack lived and spoke and thought, I thought of another fig­ure in a galaxy far away, the immor­tal Tazio Nuvolari, the great­est rac­ing dri­ver who ever lived. In Man­tua, Italy, where pass­ing dri­vers in the Mille Miglia would raise a hand in mute salute as they raced through “Nivola’s” home town, his tomb­stone bears this epi­taph: Cor­rerai ancor piu veloce per le vie del cielo. You will travel faster still upon the high­ways of heaven.

God­speed, Jack.

mille-miglia-arrow

{ 0 comments }

“Never give in”

March 5, 2009

Did Churchill ever make a three word speech, “Never Give Up,” and then just sit down? —A.S., Latvia That story is all over the web and is con­stantly repeated—even by Maine Gov­er­nor Angus King at the 1999 launch of USS Win­ston S. Churchill. But it is entirely wrong. I think it springs from one of the many inaccurate [...]

Read the full article →