Posts tagged as:

Add new tag

Do you know where Churchill made this state­ment? “Here is a law which is above the King which even he must not break. This reaf­fir­ma­tion of a supreme law and its expres­sion in a gen­eral char­ter is the great work of Magna Carta; and this alone jus­ti­fies the respect in which men have held it.” —J.F.

Yes, in a book in 1956. Churchill was explain­ing Magna Carta, the Great Char­ter of Free­doms, one of the tow­er­ing bench­marks of West­ern Civ­i­liza­tion. In his His­tory of the English-Speaking Peo­ples, vol. 1, The Birth of Britain (Lon­don: Cas­sell, 1956), 256-57. Churchill wrote:

King John signs Magna Carta (Wikipedia Commons)

King John of Eng­land signs Magna Carta (Wikipedia Commons)

If the thirteenth-century mag­nates under­stood lit­tle and cared less for pop­u­lar lib­er­ties or Par­lia­men­tary democ­racy, they had all the same laid hold of a prin­ci­ple which was to be of prime impor­tance for the future devel­op­ment of Eng­lish soci­ety and Eng­lish insti­tu­tions. Through­out the doc­u­ment it is implied that here is a law which is above the King and which even he must not break. This reaf­fir­ma­tion of a supreme law and its expres­sion in a gen­eral char­ter is the great work of Magna Carta; and this alone jus­ti­fies the respect in which men have held it. The reign of Henry II, accord­ing to the most respected author­i­ties, ini­ti­ates the rule of law. But the work as yet was incom­plete: the Crown was still above the law; the legal sys­tem which Henry had cre­ated could become, as John showed, an instru­ment of oppression.


{ 0 comments }

I was born in 1942 (Nia­gara Falls, New York) and have a sen­ti­men­tal curios­ity over where Churchill was as his pocket watch sec­ond hand swept from 1941 to 1942. Do you know the cir­cum­stances on that New Year’s Eve?  —E.C., Michi­gan, USA

Unex­pect­edly (because I don’t know many of his end-of-year pro­nounce­ments), I do. Don’t tell me you were born on Jan­u­ary 1st—if you were, Churchill might have been hurtling past Nia­gara Falls vir­tu­ally at the same time!

As 1942 began Churchill was on a train return­ing from Ottawa, Ontario (where he had made the “Some chicken–some neck!” speech to the Cana­dian Par­lia­ment) to Wash­ing­ton, where he resumed his meet­ings with Pres­i­dent Roo­sevelt in the omi­nous days fol­low­ing Pearl Har­bor and the Japan­ese inva­sion of south­east Asia.

The Prime Min­is­ter  called his staff and news­pa­per reporters to the din­ing car of his train to wel­come the New Year. Then, rais­ing his glass to the com­pany, he made this toast:

Here’s to 1942, here’s to a year of toil—a year of strug­gle and peril, and a long step for­ward towards vic­tory. May we all come through safe and with honour.

His sen­ti­ments at that time are not entirely inap­pro­pri­ate for the cir­cum­stances in which we find our­selves at the begin­ning of 2009….

—from Churchill by Him­self page 498, the pre­dic­tions chap­ter enti­tled “Churchill Clair­voy­ant.” The first pub­lished ref­er­ence is in Churchill’s speech volume, The End of the Begin­ning (Lon­don: Cas­sell, 1943, page 3).

{ 0 comments }

Bull in a China Shop

March 13, 2009

An recent arti­cle declares: “Win­ston Churchill once described Amer­i­can diplo­macy as  ‘a bull who car­ries his own china shop around with him.’” Is this an accu­rate quote, and if so, in rela­tion too what? —L.K., Texas The expres­sion is fre­quently repeated, but in regard to Eisenhower’s Sec­re­tary of State John Fos­ter Dulles, not Amer­i­can diplomacy. [...]

Read the full article →