“10,000 Regulations…Destroy All Respect for the Law”

by Richard Langworth on 24 July 2012

Today I saw on Facebook a quote attrib­uted to Win­ston Churchill. “If you have ten thou­sand reg­u­la­tions you destroy all respect for the law.”I can find no doc­u­men­ta­tion to sup­port his say­ing or writ­ing these words. Can you help me to ver­ify it is an accu­rate quote or a mis­at­tri­bu­tion? —Jenny via email

Jenny, Facebook and Twit­ter must be the world’s lead­ing sources of false Churchill quotes, so thanks for ques­tion­ing this one—which is, for a change, right (although his word was “make,” not “have”)….

From Churchill By Him­self page 17:

Free Mar­ket

“If you destroy a free mar­ket you cre­ate a black market.”

—House of Com­mons, 3 Feb­ru­ary 1949

Churchill added: “If you make ten thou­sand reg­u­la­tions you destroy all respect for the law.”

He was argu­ing against the sti­fling reg­u­la­tions of indus­try and com­merce by the post­war Labour Gov­ern­ment (1945-51). Not a lot new under the sun.

Share this post...Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on LinkedInPin on PinterestEmail this to someone

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Trochilus April 17, 2014 at 11:57

There are several wonderful reasons why Winston Churchill has long been so respected and so loved by the American people. Central to that connection he had with us, and vice versa, the true affinity which we felt for him, was grounded in his uncommon capacity to summarize, in a few choice words, that which we had been seeing previously as a problem of extraordinary complexity. Every once in a while, some insightful and incisive comment that he made at some point in his long career, becomes quite relevant to our current understanding of ourselves as a free people.

To me, the above quotations from 1949, spoken to the House of Commons, reaches out to we Americans today, and has a ring of truth to it which we should heed.

Let me share a somewhat similar sentiment — the words of “Publius” (in this particular case, probably written by James Madison, but possibly by Alexander Hamilton) from “The Federalist Papers Number 62,” one of the many the series of defenses of the proposed United States Constitution, which were written and published in New York, beginning back in 1787. Number 62 was first published on February 27, 1788.

” … It will be of little avail to the people, that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood; if they be repealed or revised before they are promulgated, or undergo such incessant changes that no man, who knows what the law is to-day, can guess what it will be to-morrow. Law is defined to be a rule of action; but how can that be a rule, which is little known, and less fixed?
. . . .”

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: