<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Mein Kampf and the Koran</title> <atom:link href="http://richardlangworth.com/mein-kampf-and-the-koran/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://richardlangworth.com/mein-kampf-and-the-koran</link> <description>Churchill historian, automotive and travel writer</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 02:15:09 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Richard M. Langworth</title><link>http://richardlangworth.com/mein-kampf-and-the-koran#comment-560</link> <dc:creator>Richard M. Langworth</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 21:33:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://richardlangworth.com/?p=9#comment-560</guid> <description>I&#039;m not sure what your point is. &quot;Articles of faith&quot; have been used to support violence since there were Articles. Violence in the name of Christianity peaked 1300-1400 years after the founding of the religion, ironically the same age as Islam is today. It&#039;s not what is written, it&#039;s the use people make of it. In this respect Churchill&#039;s comparison was apt.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m not sure what your point is. “Articles of faith” have been used to support violence since there were Articles. Violence in the name of Christianity peaked 1300-1400 years after the founding of the religion, ironically the same age as Islam is today. It’s not what is written, it’s the use people make of it. In this respect Churchill’s comparison was apt.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave of Detroit</title><link>http://richardlangworth.com/mein-kampf-and-the-koran#comment-559</link> <dc:creator>Dave of Detroit</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 15:32:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://richardlangworth.com/?p=9#comment-559</guid> <description>&lt;em&gt;Mein Kampf&lt;/em&gt; passages support world conquest through violence -- the Nazi master race will control all, one way or another. Koran passages support world conquest through violence. Bible passages do not support world conquest through violence. The ancient Jewish nation had a national border and lived within it -- no one was forced to live there.  So-called Christians in the past have used violence, but they could not find Bible passages that would support that violence. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Mein Kampf</em> passages support world conquest through violence — the Nazi master race will control all, one way or another. Koran passages support world conquest through violence. Bible passages do not support world conquest through violence. The ancient Jewish nation had a national border and lived within it — no one was forced to live there.  So-called Christians in the past have used violence, but they could not find Bible passages that would support that violence.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Richard M. Langworth</title><link>http://richardlangworth.com/mein-kampf-and-the-koran#comment-246</link> <dc:creator>Richard M. Langworth</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:39:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://richardlangworth.com/?p=9#comment-246</guid> <description>Hold on there. The purpose of my post is to correct various misstatements made about Churchill by Glenn Beck and Geert Wilders, not to state my opinion. (It was Wilders who misrepresented Churchill&#039;s comparison with &lt;em&gt;Mein Kampf&lt;/em&gt;.) But if you&#039;re asking my opinion, it is that by &quot;Mohammedan law&quot; Churchill was referring to what he saw among Mohammedans where he was at the time, and remember, he was writing in 1898. However, I also have eyes to observe, for example, how woman are treated in certain places in 2011. And I beg to register my disapproval. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hold on there. The purpose of my post is to correct various misstatements made about Churchill by Glenn Beck and Geert Wilders, not to state my opinion. (It was Wilders who misrepresented Churchill’s comparison with <em>Mein Kampf</em>.) But if you’re asking my opinion, it is that by “Mohammedan law” Churchill was referring to what he saw among Mohammedans where he was at the time, and remember, he was writing in 1898. However, I also have eyes to observe, for example, how woman are treated in certain places in 2011. And I beg to register my disapproval.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Reader comment</title><link>http://richardlangworth.com/mein-kampf-and-the-koran#comment-245</link> <dc:creator>Reader comment</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 22:20:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://richardlangworth.com/?p=9#comment-245</guid> <description>Hello. First of all, there is nothing like &quot;Mohammedan Law&quot; in the universe. The laws that are given in Koran are the laws of the creator, Allah.Secondly, Winston Churchill&#039;s saying is absolutely wrong. There is nothing like &quot;every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property either as a child, a wife, or concubine&quot; in the Koran. The truth is Islam has always encouraged the extinction of slavery and protected to laws of women. Let me give you an example.In his final sermon, the last prophet said, &quot;Do treat your women well and be kind to them for they are your partners and committed helpers.&quot;Please do more research on Islam if you want to learn its immense vision of life.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello. First of all, there is nothing like “Mohammedan Law” in the universe. The laws that are given in Koran are the laws of the creator, Allah.</p><p>Secondly, Winston Churchill’s saying is absolutely wrong. There is nothing like “every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property either as a child, a wife, or concubine” in the Koran. The truth is Islam has always encouraged the extinction of slavery and protected to laws of women. Let me give you an example.</p><p>In his final sermon, the last prophet said, “Do treat your women well and be kind to them for they are your partners and committed helpers.”</p><p>Please do more research on Islam if you want to learn its immense vision of life.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: richardlangworth.com @ 2012-05-17 21:29:36 by W3 Total Cache -->
