From the category archives:

Literary

I am a long­time Gone With The Wind col­lec­tor and researcher, and give pre­sen­ta­tions at GWTW events. I’ve also been the GWTW Answer Lady on sev­eral websites. I was recently asked whether Churchill and Roo­sevelt had read Gone With The Wind. I found that FDR read quite a bit of the novel, but I couldn’t come up with any­thing about Churchill. I hope you don’t mind me toss­ing you this ques­tion. Maybe you’ve run across a men­tion of it. I assume that Churchill did see the film as FDR did on 26 Decem­ber 1939, after the movie opened in Wash­ing­ton. GWTW opened in Lon­don on 18 April 1940.  —K.M., Royal Oak, Michigan

On the con­trary, your ques­tion sent me on an inter­est­ing dive through the archives to learn about my favorite char­ac­ter and my favorite novel.

Leslie Howard as Ash­ley Wilkes

Before we get started, a side note: Leslie Howard, who played Ash­ley Wilkes in GWTW, had a busi­ness man­ager, Alfred Chen­halls, who closely resem­bled Churchill, affect­ing sim­i­lar cloth­ing and a hom­burg hat.

Ger­man spies in Lis­bon, observ­ing Chen­halls and Howard board­ing a flight to Lon­don, mis­took them for Churchill and his body­guard. They informed the Luft­waffe, who shot down the plane. Poor Ash­ley Wilkes, ever the loser!

Churchill wrote of the inci­dent: “The bru­tal­ity of the Ger­mans was only matched by the stu­pid­ity of their agents.”

==============================

THE BOOK

In the late 1930s every­body was read­ing it, from my mother to Neville Cham­ber­lain. (His biog­ra­pher Keith Feil­ing tells us that Cham­ber­lain was “tak­ing delight” in it as the Czech cri­sis devel­oped in spring 1938.) Churchill was read­ing it as he wrote the Amer­i­can Civil War chap­ters of his His­tory of the English-Speaking Peo­ples (not pub­lished until after the war). Thanks to Mar­tin Gilbert’s biog­ra­phy we know quite a lot:

Win­ston S. Churchill to Brigadier-General Sir James Edmonds, a Civil War author­ity (Churchill papers: 8/626), 24 March 1939:

When one comes to look at it en bloc, the Con­fed­er­ates never had any chance at all. It was only a ques­tion of the North get­ting under way and the amount of time required to destroy, if nec­es­sary, every liv­ing soul in the Con­fed­er­ate states. The dra­matic point is the won­der­ful resis­tance which they made.

Churchill was fear­ing a new war in Europe at this time:

Have you read Gone With The Wind? It is a ter­rific book, but I expect you are too pressed with your work to read….I hope you are as san­guine as you used to be about no war and our not get­ting scragged.

Edmonds quickly replied, still con­fi­dent of no war in the future:

I have read Gone With The Wind, also Action at Aquia (deal­ing with the dev­as­ta­tion of the Shenan­doah val­ley) and most nov­els on the war includ­ing your namesake’s The Cri­sis [Civil War novel by the Amer­i­can Win­ston Churchill]…..Yes, I am still san­guine. Hitler won’t fight with­out an Ally and Mus­solini is “not for it.”

—Mar­tin Gilbert, Win­ston S. Churchill, Com­pan­ion Vol­ume V, Part 3, Doc­u­ments: The Com­ing of War 1936-1939 (Lon­don: Heine­mann, 1982), 1406, 1413.

It would be inter­est­ing to re-read Churchill’s Civil War chap­ters in A His­tory of the English-Speaking Peo­ples in the knowl­edge that he was read­ing GWTW at the time he wrote them. Nor­man Rose writes:

A His­tory of the English-Speaking Peo­ples is gen­er­ally acknowl­edged to be the least sat­is­fac­tory of [Churchill's] books. It reads as a kind of pas­tiche that pro­claims his “sec­u­lar [Whig] faith,” its finest sec­tion (writ­ten as he read Gone With The Wind) telling the story of the Amer­i­can Civil War….[but] the fact that Churchill was not a trained his­to­rian had its mer­its. As every scholar knows, in research it is nec­es­sary to be dogged in pur­suit of sources, but also ruth­less in sens­ing when to stop and to start writing.

—Nor­man Rose, Churchill: An Unruly Life (New York: Simon & Schus­ter, 1994), 211

==============================

THE FILM

Gable and Leigh at their height (www.altfg.com)

Churchill was clearly bowled over when he saw the film pro­duc­tion. Wit­nesss the John Colville diary (Colville papers) 15 Decem­ber 1940, Ditch­ley Park, Oxford:

We saw Gone With The Wind which lasted till 2.00 a.m. I thought the pho­tog­ra­phy superb. The PM said he was “pul­verised by the strength of their feel­ings and emotions.”

—Mar­tin Gilbert, The Churchill War Papers, vol. 2, Never Sur­ren­der, May 1940-December 1940] (Lon­don: Heine­mann, 1994), 1241.

And in his main bio­graphic vol­ume Sir Mar­tin writes:

On Sun­day Decem­ber 15, at Che­quers, after watch­ing the film Gone With The Wind, he had sat from two until three in the morn­ing dis­cussing the cam­paign in North Africa with Eden. As they talked, the total num­ber of Ital­ian pris­on­ers of war cap­tured by Wavell’s army reached 35,000.

—Mar­tin Gilbert, Win­ston S. Churchill, vol. 6, Finest Hour 1939-1941 (Lon­don: Heine­mann, 1983), 946.

It has been reported, though I have not run down the source, that Churchill once met Vivien Leigh—and was ren­dered speech­less (rare for him) by her beauty. Appar­ently this stemmed not from her role as Scar­lett O’Hara, but as Nelson’s “Lady Hamil­ton” (“That Hamil­ton Woman”)—beyond doubt his favorite film. Nor­man Rose adds:

Late night films, dis­tract­ing “the mind away from other things,” were “a won­der­ful form of enter­tain­ment” that he did not for­sake. He walked out of a “sen­ti­men­tal” Mickey Rooney pic­ture, but stayed for Bette Davis’s splen­did tragedy, Dark Vic­tory, and was “pul­ver­ized” by the emo­tional inten­sity gen­er­ated by Rhett But­ler (Clark Gable) and Scar­lett O’Hara (Vivien Leigh) in Gone With The Wind. Once, at a show­ing of Oliver Twist, when Bill Sykes was coax­ing his dog to the edge of the river to drown it, Churchill thought­fully cov­ered the eyes of his beloved poo­dle, Rufus, who sat on his lap.

Unruly Life, 283

==============================

IN THE CANON

Mar­garet Mitchell’s won­der­ful title inspired Churchill to use it twice. In his World War II mem­oirs he summed up the results of Appease­ment:

Look back and see what we had suc­ces­sively accepted or thrown away: a Ger­many dis­armed by solemn treaty; a Ger­many rearmed in vio­la­tion of a solemn treaty; air supe­ri­or­ity or even air par­ity cast away; the Rhineland forcibly occu­pied and the Siegfried Line built or build­ing; the Berlin-Rome Axis estab­lished; Aus­tria devoured and digested by the Reich; Czecho­slo­va­kia deserted and ruined by the Munich Pact, its fortress line in Ger­man hands, its mighty arse­nal of Skoda hence­for­ward mak­ing muni­tions for the Ger­man armies; Pres­i­dent Roosevelt’s effort to sta­bilise or bring to a head the Euro­pean sit­u­a­tion by the inter­ven­tion of the United States waved aside with one hand, and Soviet Russia’s undoubted will­ing­ness to join the West­ern Pow­ers and go all lengths to save Czecho­slo­va­kia ignored on the other; the ser­vices of thirty-five Czech divi­sions against the still unripened Ger­many Army cast away, when Great Britain could her­self sup­ply only two to strengthen the front in France; all gone with the wind.

—Win­ston S. Churchill, The Sec­ond World War, vol. 2, Their Finest Hour (Lon­don: Cas­sell, 1953), 271

But it was the march toward Munich in 1938 that saw Churchill’s most effec­tive use of the title:

For five years I have talked to the House on these matters—not with very great suc­cess. I have watched this famous island descend­ing incon­ti­nently, feck­lessly, the stair­way which leads to a dark gulf. It is a fine broad stair­way at the begin­ning, but after a bit the car­pet ends. A lit­tle far­ther on there are only flag­stones, and a lit­tle far­ther on still these break beneath your feet…. if mor­tal cat­a­stro­phe should over­take the British Nation and the British Empire, historians a thou­sand years hence will still be baf­fled by the mys­tery of our affairs. They will never under­stand how it was that a vic­to­ri­ous nation, with every­thing in hand, suf­fered them­selves to be brought low, and to cast away all that they had gained by mea­sure­less sac­ri­fice and absolute vic­tory —gone with the wind!

—Win­ston S. Churchill, Arms and the Covenant (Lon­don: Har­rap, 1938), 465: “The Danube Basin,” House of Com­mons, 4 March 1938.


{ 0 comments }

We are hap­pily informed that one of the finest-ever films about Win­ston Churchill, fea­tur­ing the late Lee Remick as his mother in Jen­nie: Lady Ran­dolph Churchill, is now avail­able on CD from Ama­zon. It was orig­i­nally a tele­vi­sion doc­u­men­tary, “The life and loves of Jen­nie Churchill,” broad­cast on ITV in Britain and PBS in the USA in 1974.

On 4 May 1991 the Inter­na­tional Churchill Soci­ety held a din­ner for Lee, then dying of can­cer, on the Queen Mary in Long Beach, to present her with our Blenheim Award for notable con­tri­bu­tions to our knowl­edge of the life and times of Win­ston Churchill. It was a bit­ter­sweet occa­sion, Lee’s last appear­ance in pub­lic. But we did her proud, thanks to the par­tic­i­pa­tion of a spe­cial guest, Gre­gory Peck, who started off with a droll story:

It was my priv­i­lege to work in only one film with Lee. It was called “The Omen.” It had to do with Satanism. It had some hor­ri­fy­ing spe­cial effects; it was a spine tin­gler, excru­ci­at­ingly suspenseful—and com­plete nonsense—and a block­buster! Peo­ple lined up for blocks to see it. While the stu­dio exec­u­tives took bows as the money rolled in, only Lee and I knew the secret of the film’s extra­or­di­nary suc­cess: We did it! It was our spe­cial artistry, our sen­si­tive por­trayal of a mar­ried cou­ple very much in love, to whom all these dread­ful things were hap­pen­ing. We pro­vided the human ele­ment that made it all work.

He said all this very much tongue-in-cheek. Then he added what he had really come to say:

Lee Remick in Lon­don, 1974, photo by Allan War­ren from Wiki­me­dia Commons.

There can­not be another Amer­i­can actress so well suited, by her beauty, her high spir­its, her intel­li­gence, and more than that, by the mys­tery of a rare qual­ity which I would call a depth of wom­an­li­ness, to play the mother of Win­ston Churchill….Playing oppo­site this clear-eyed Yan­kee girl with the appeal­ing style and fem­i­nin­ity that graces every one of her roles just sim­ply brings out the best in a man.

Lee was not a Lady Ran­dolph looka­like, wrote critic Stew­art Knowles: “What cast the illu­sion were clothes, wigs, and the tal­ent of a great actress.” She was one of the most remark­able actresses Amer­ica ever produced—from her debut in “A Face in the Crowd” (1957) and “The Long Hot Sum­mer” (1958) through her Oscar nom­i­na­tion as the wife of Jack Lem­mon in “The Days of Wine and Roses” (1962) and her final film, “Emma’s War” (1986). She won seven Emmy nom­i­na­tions for her out­stand­ing roles in tele­vi­sion docu­d­rama, includ­ing the role of Eisenhower’s wartime chauffeur/mistress, Kay Sum­mersby, as well as Jen­nie Churchill.

Lee as "Jen­nie" (1974)

Although it was a great honor to wel­come Gre­gory Peck (and amus­ing to watch people’s reac­tion as he walked with us through the ship’s cor­ri­dors to our din­ner), it was a very sad night, for Lee was swollen with med­ica­tions and just barely able to speak. Her hus­band, the British film pro­ducer Kip Gowans, made sure to tip Greg in advance, for he hadn’t seen Lee in years and would oth­er­wise have been unpre­pared for the change her ill­ness had wrought—which, great man that he was, Mr. Peck never hinted he had observed.

We played excerpts from “Jen­nie” before giv­ing her the award, and I noticed when the lights came back on that she was in tears.

“I was beau­ti­ful then,” she said wistfully.

“But Lee,” I said, “you still have those eyes…”

{ 0 comments }

Winston S. Churchill 1940-2010

March 10, 2010

You can read about Win­ston Churchill’s career else­where. I’d like rather to indulge in the remem­brance of a friend. We met through the post forty-two years ago, when he became the third hon­orary mem­ber of the Churchill Study Unit, after his grand­mother and his father. The lat­ter had only just sent a let­ter of encour­age­ment to our [...]

Read the full article →

“Duly Inscribed” by WSC

August 30, 2009

I have a first Amer­i­can edi­tion of Churchill’s Boer war book, Lon­don to Lady­smith via Pre­to­ria (New York: Long­mans Green, 1900). On the inside cover, there is a label with a sig­na­ture of Win­ston Churchill. Do you think that it is an orig­i­nal sig­na­ture or is it a label that was printed in quan­ti­ties? —L.C., Que­bec, Canada The first [...]

Read the full article →

Songs Churchill Would Love: “Willie McBride”

June 27, 2009

Sir Mar­tin Gilbert’s mov­ing book, The Somme: Hero­ism and Hor­ror in the First World War, ends with verses by the Scottish-Australian song­writer Eric Bogle, which carry an ever­green mes­sage to all gen­er­a­tions, and cap­ture what Churchill thought of mod­ern war—which he tried so hard, before both World Wars, to avoid. Sir Mar­tin writes that in research [...]

Read the full article →