From the monthly archives:

March 2009

I’m searching for  a quote about William Pitt, used also about Churchill in 1940: something like, “No one left his presence who did not feel braver,” but more eloquent.     —M.M., Indiana

Sir John Martin's memoirs (not diary). Foreground L-R: Jock Colville, Churchill, John Martin.

Sir John Martin's memoirs (not diary). Foreground L-R: Jock Colville, Churchill, John Martin.

The quote about Pitt is from the 30 May 1940 diary of John Martin, one of Churchill’s private secretaries, first published in Martin Gilbert’s Official Biography, Winston S. Churchill, vol. VI, Finest Hour 1939-1941 (London: Heinemann, 1983), 435-36:

During May 30 [1940] Desmond Morton sent Churchill a seven page note by the Australian High Commissioner in London, Stanley Bruce, arguing, in one of its paragraphs, in favour of an international conference “to formulate a peace settlement.” Churchill struck out this paragraph, and wrote in the margin: “No.” Crossing out Bruce’s final point, that “the further shedding of blood and the continuance of hideous suffering is unnecessary” and that the belligerents should “cease the struggle,” Churchill wrote: “Rot,” and went on to note, for Morton: “The end is rotten.” That night one of Churchill’s private secretaries, John Martin, wrote home: “The PM’s confidence and energy are amazing. ‘Nobody left his presence without feeling a braver man’ was said of Pitt; but it is no less true of him.”

On The Churchill Centre’s Churchillchat, James Lancaster tracked the quote, about William Pitt the Elder, to Colonel Barré, who was appointed Treasurer of the Navy in 1754, but noted that Martin did not have it quite right. According to R.F. Winch’s Essays on William Pitt, Earl of Chatham (1898) Barré said: “No one ever entered his closet who did not come out of it a braver man.”

The date of Martin’s comment is significant. Only two days before, on May 28th, Churchill had prevailed in the debate over whether to seek an armistice with Hitler, possibly through Mussolini, as suggested by Lord Halifax:

I have thought carefully in these last days whether it was part of my duty to consider entering into negotiations with That Man [Hitler]….The Germans would demand our fleet—that would be called ‘disarmament’—our naval bases, and much else. We should become a slave state….And I am convinced that every man of you would rise up and tear me down from my place if I were for one moment to contemplate parley or surrender. If this long island story of ours is to end at last, let it end only when each one of us lies choking in his own blood upon the ground. (Gilbert, 420.)

Churchill wrote, with perhaps some exaggeration in his war memoirs:

There occurred a demonstration which considering the character of the gathering—twenty-five experienced politicians and Parliament men, who represented all the different points of view, whether right or wrong, before the war—surprised me. Quite a number seemed to jump up from the table and come running to my chair, shouting and patting me on the back. There is no doubt that had I at this juncture faltered at all in the leading of the nation I should have been hurled out of office. I was sure that every Minister was ready to be killed quite soon, and have all his family and possessions destroyed rather than give in. In this they represented the House of Commons and almost all the people. It fell to me in these coming days and months to express their sentiments on suitable occasions. This I was able to do because they were mine also. There was a white glow over-powering, sublime, which ran through our Island from end to end. (Their Finest Hour, London: Cassell, 1949, 48.)

John Martin’s comparison of Churchill to Pitt was quoted by both David Irving and John Charmley in their critical biographies. A brief toast to Messrs. Irving and Charmley.

Before and since we’ve heard the refrain: Churchill destroyed the British Empire and laid the way for Russo-American hegemony by rejecting Realpolitik and refusing to “do a deal” with “That Man,” Churchill himself replied to this shortly after his retirement in 1955 when it was raised by his private secretary. Sir Anthony Montague Browne records Churchill’s answer in his book, Long Sunset (London: Cassell, 1955, 200):

You’re only saying that to be provocative. You know very well we couldn’t have made peace on the heels of a terrible defeat. The country wouldn’t have stood for it. And what makes you think that we could have trusted Hitler’s word—particularly as he could soon have had Russian resources behind him? At best we would have been a German client state, and there’s not much in that.


{ 0 comments }

A friend asks if there has been a solid refutation of Pat Buchanan’s book. I’m sure there has been, and I wouldn’t be surprised if it has been published in Finest Hour, but could you give me the citation? —W.M.

Professor David Freeman at Cal State Fullerton wrote the full review in Finest Hour 139, Summer 2008. I ganged up on poor Pat Buchanan by writing about his selective quotation techniques in my accompanying editorial, which I reprise below.

Churchill, Hitler and the Unnecessary War: How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World, by Patrick J. Buchanan. New York, Crown, 518 pp., $29.95.

A problem illustrated by Pat Buchanan’s book is the rampant use of selective quotes. No animus toward the author: I have respect for Pat Buchanan and even voted for him in the 1992 New Hampshire Primary (the beginning of the end for President George Bush I). “I like a man who grins when he fights,” as Churchill said. But selective quotations edited to distort the facts and to fit a predetermined mindset are out of bounds.

To establish Churchill’s “lust” for World War I, for example, Buchanan quotes him on 28 July 1914: “Everything tends towards catastrophe & collapse. I am interested, geared up and happy. Is it not horrible to be built like that?…” (page 28)

But he omits the rest of that passage: “…The preparations have a hideous fascination for me. I pray to God to forgive me for such fearful moods of levity. Yet I w[oul]d do my best for peace, and nothing w[oul]d induce me wrongfully to strike the blow.” (Italics mine, from Martin Gilbert, editor,  Winston S. Churchill, Companion Volume II, Part 3, page 1989, back in print at Hillsdale College Press.)

As the war mounts on 10 January 1915, Buchanan has Churchill exclaiming: “My God! This, this is living History. Everything we are doing and saying is thrilling—it will be read by a thousand generations, think of that! Why I would not be out of this glorious delicious war for anything the world could give me (eyes glowing but with a slight anxiety lest the word ‘delicious’ should jar on me).” (page 66)

The latter is pure hearsay from the notoriously waspish Margot Asquith—but assume he said it. To suit his thesis, Pat trims the rest of what Margot reported: “…I say don’t repeat that I said the word ‘delicious’—you know what I mean…..” (Italics mine, from Martin Gilbert, editor, Winston S. Churchill, Companion Volume III, Part 1, page 400.)

Possessed of the words deleted from Buchanan’s quote of Margot’s idle chit-chat, one might ask what Churchill meant by “you know what I mean”? Did he assume Margot knew he realized what barbarity war was—that he had been warning of the apocalyptic nature of a European war since attacking the Army Estimates in 1903?

I searched in vain amid Pat’s collection of lusty war quotes for contrary expressions—and there are many. Take Churchill’s 1909 remark after watching German Army maneuvers: “Much as war attracts me & fascinates my mind with its tremendous situations—I feel more deeply every year—& can measure the feeling here in the midst of arms—what vile & wicked folly & barbarism it all is” (Winston S. Churchill, Companion Volume II, Part 2, 912).

The author does include an early 1900s remark about the dangers of a European war, but only to imply that Churchill had changed his tune by 1914. Nowhere do we read exculpatory evidence, such as Churchill’s 1911 proposal for an Anglo-German “naval holiday” or his plea, at the eleventh hour, for a peace conference attended by all the Heads of State of Europe.

Then there is Hitler, on whom Pat has been industrious. Under Hitler’s photo we read: “‘If our country were defeated, I hope we should find a champion as indomitable to restore our courage and lead us back to our place among the nations.’ —Churchill on Hitler, 1937.”

This sentence has often been culled out to be misunderstood by the unwary. Here is the full passage (Churchill, Step by Step, 1947 edition, 158). Draw your own conclusions:

To feel deep concern about the armed power of Germany is in no way derogatory to Germany. On the contrary, it is a tribute to the wonderful and terrible strength which Germany exerted in the Great War, when almost single-handed she fought nearly all the world and nearly beat them. Naturally, when a people who have shown such magnificent military qualities are arming night and day, its neighbours, who bear the scars of previous conflicts, must be anxious and ought to be vigilant. One may dislike Hitler’s system and yet admire his patriotic achievement. If our country were defeated I hope we should find a champion as indomitable to restore our courage and lead us back to our place among the nations. I have on more than one occasion made my appeal in public that the Führer of Germany should now become the Hitler of peace.

All of which shows yet again that you can use Churchill’s words, vacuumed like a gigantic Hoover and offered without ellipses by the faithful Martin Gilbert, to prove anything. You only have to pre-select and edit the right ones.

Coming up: London, 7pm, Thursday 3 September, 70th anniversary of the outbreak of World War II: Intelligence Squared hosts a debate at the Royal Geographical Society in Exhibition Road on the motion: ‘That this House believes Winston Churchill was more of a liability than an asset in the Second World War’. Prof. Norman Stone and Pat Buchanan will be proposing the motion and Sir Martin Gilbert, Antony Beevor and Andrew Roberts will be opposing it.

{ 0 comments }

“If you will not fight…when you can easily win…”

March 24, 2009

I remember a quip: “When will we fight. When we have no hope.” Can you help me identify the source?
Those words do not track among Churchill’s 15 million  published words.. You may be thinking of:
…if you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your [...]

Read the full article →

“To be opened in the event of my death…”

March 24, 2009

I am doing some work for my English AS course and  need a comparitive piece to go with a poem I am studying. I have tried looking  for Winston Churchill’s goodbye letter to his wife but have been unsuccessful. Is there any way I could even have a part of the text of the letter [...]

Read the full article →

“You see, Mr. President, I have nothing to hide”

March 24, 2009

Obituaries for Churchill’s wartime secretary Patrick Kinna report that he saw a naked Churchill greet Franklin Roosevelt at the White House, saying he had “nothing to hide from the President.” Conrad Black in Franklin Delano Roosevelt: Champion of Freedom has Churchill denying he ever appeared to the President completely undressed. My guess is that the obituary writers [...]

Read the full article →